Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QUESTION] SDK/API level #496

Open
ghost opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

[QUESTION] SDK/API level #496

ghost opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 11, 2025

Are there plans to eventually target higher android SDK/API levels (Namida currently being at 32)? Looking at the API changes, it looks like it may be a lot of work to ensure things work smoothly, but just out of interest.

Off-topic but side note, I absolutely love the work you're doing with this project. Namida is light-years ahead of any other music application I've used on android, I greatly appreciate the effort you're putting into it.

@ghost ghost added the question Further information is requested label Feb 11, 2025
@MSOB7YY
Copy link
Member

MSOB7YY commented Feb 11, 2025

hallo! the main reason its still targetted at 32 is the storage permissions, last time i tried using granular permissions for api 33 (audio/video/pictures instead of "storage"), it didnt end up well
and thats just as a start hgahghaha
i honestly dont wanna bother it, but now that v5 is almost coming, i might gradually do it

thanks for the love tho! it loves u too <3

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Feb 11, 2025

@MSOB7YY I imagine it was quite a mess! 😅
Thanks for taking the time to explain.

Best of luck for if/when you try again!

@MSOB7YY
Copy link
Member

MSOB7YY commented Feb 11, 2025

yah thanks ! i will try again soon dw :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant