Change how AMO listing pages list "More extensions by [developer]"

[devaneymoz]

Description

If a developer has more than one extension listed on AMO, their listing pages will automatically include a bottom-page module titled "More extensions by [developer]" that lists up to 6 additional extensions. If the developer has more than 6 extensions the module selects 6 based on a type of trending signal (i.e. surge of recent engagement).

However, we'd prefer this module list up to 6 extensions based on overall usage/popularity, as opposed to trending. Doing so will provide more visibility to the developer's most impactful content.

@abyrne-moz @diox

Acceptance Criteria

Milestones/checkpoints

Preview Give feedback

1. Sort "More extensions/themes/add-ons by" card on Add-on page by usage rather than growth

Checks

• If I have identified that the work is specific to a repository, I have removed "repository:addons-server" or "repository:addons-frontend"

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task

[alexandruschek]

Hello,

I checked on -DEV, several addons and the "more extensions by [developer]" list. Here are two examples:
One in which only one addon from the list has more users than 0:
https://addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/firefox/addon/all-of-the-permissions/

A case with multiple addons that have a higher number of users:
https://addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/firefox/addon/restricted-addon/

And in the case of multiple developers, the addons in the list are not in the correct order or at least it looks like it:
https://addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/firefox/addon/scenario-6/

@diox If the last case is not considered an issue, then I will add the verified label. If it's an issue, please tell me so I can open a separate one if it is needed.

Thank you @diox for the help!

[diox]

So, the last one is an edge case around multiple users, this is not new and was intended back when this feature was built.

This is happening because when there are multiple authors we show add-ons for all of them separately. The first 2 are coming from a different developer than the rest, and they both have 0 users so the order is irrelevant. The next "batch" is all from the second author and all have users to we can see the ordering works.

[alexandruschek]

Ok, marking this as verified fix. Thank you!