You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The random patterns should accept some sort of an argument that specifies a minimum distance as a constraint. From what I can tell, this sort of behavior is not supported in the random patters that exist.
As a simple example, functionalizing a given carbon atom in graphene more or less means an adjacent should not be available for functionalization. This could be avoided by using grid patterns, but that is physically undesirable for sense for some systems such as oxidized graphene.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm pretty sure I experimented with this locally several years ago. I'll see if I can find what I did (it might just be on an old branch), but either way this should be fairly easy to implement.
The random patterns should accept some sort of an argument that specifies a minimum distance as a constraint. From what I can tell, this sort of behavior is not supported in the random patters that exist.
As a simple example, functionalizing a given carbon atom in graphene more or less means an adjacent should not be available for functionalization. This could be avoided by using grid patterns, but that is physically undesirable for sense for some systems such as oxidized graphene.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: