You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The switch case explanation is a bit misleading . There should be a break statement after every case for it to function as an if-else statement, otherwise it will evaluate all the cases.
switch (x) { // x must be int
case X1: a; break; // If x == X1 (must be a const), jump here
case X2: b; break; // Else if x == X2, jump here
default: c; // Else jump here (optional)
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The switch case explanation is a bit misleading . There should be a break statement after every case for it to function as an if-else statement, otherwise it will evaluate all the cases.
switch (x) { // x must be int
case X1: a; break; // If x == X1 (must be a const), jump here
case X2: b; break; // Else if x == X2, jump here
default: c; // Else jump here (optional)
}
Hi, @uxrkhan Switch cases i.e. (X1 and X2) mentioned above have break statements. But the fact is default case should also include a break statement. @mortennobel thanks for creating this cheat sheet. You can insert a break for default case and close this issue.
The switch case also support char type , not only int type, though char is a kind of int.
switch (x) { // x must be int and char
case X1: a; break; // If x == X1 (must be a const), jump here
case X2: b; break; // Else if x == X2, jump here
default: c; // Else jump here (optional)
}
The switch case explanation is a bit misleading . There should be a break statement after every case for it to function as an if-else statement, otherwise it will evaluate all the cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: