Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Re-design accuracy functions #1106

Closed
paxcema opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Re-design accuracy functions #1106

paxcema opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@paxcema
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix Will not fix / very low priority

Comments

@paxcema
Copy link
Contributor

paxcema commented Feb 8, 2023

At the moment their usage is not intuitive. Proposal:

  • best_of ensemble picks the best mixer based on a single given accuracy function
  • the rest of them will be used for further model insights in the AccStats block

How to best restructure this at the problem definition level is still undecided, though.
@paxcema paxcema added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 8, 2023
@paxcema
Copy link
Contributor Author

paxcema commented Feb 28, 2024

Also: add docs within Lightwood that reference the evaluator package, and what functions are supported.

@paxcema paxcema added the wontfix Will not fix / very low priority label Aug 9, 2024
@paxcema paxcema closed this as completed Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@paxcema paxcema

Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix Will not fix / very low priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@paxcema