Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add an easier way to do json encoding #6

Open
mikeshultz opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Add an easier way to do json encoding #6

mikeshultz opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mikeshultz
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@mikeshultz
Copy link
Owner

JSON encoding doesn't work plainly right now. Though users can create custom implementations to handle it, it would be better to add a way to do easy json encoding so json.dumps() can be applied directly to results from a query.
@mikeshultz mikeshultz self-assigned this Jan 4, 2018
mikeshultz added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
@mikeshultz
Added a RawlJSONEncoder class for easy json conversion. Issue #6
7f8da5e
mikeshultz added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
@mikeshultz
Made RawlJSONEncoder a subclass of psycopg2.extras.json.JSONEncoder. …
6f01fc3 
…Issue #6
mikeshultz added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
@mikeshultz
The psycopg2 JSONEncoder is the same thing... Issue #6
7b31ab1
@mikeshultz
Copy link
Owner Author

msgspec or pydantic? The latter may be too heavy for this, unless there's a nice way to just integrate the two.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mikeshultz mikeshultz

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mikeshultz