feat: optimized Deployment workflow by separating jobs into individual workflows #337
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This pull request introduces a new modular and reusable GitHub Actions workflow system for deployment, testing, and cleanup on both Linux and Windows environments. The changes replace previous monolithic workflows with a set of orchestrated jobs, improving maintainability, configurability, and automation for Azure resource management and CI/CD processes.
Reusable Workflow Architecture:
deployment-orchestrator.yml) that coordinates deployment, Docker image building, end-to-end testing, notifications, and cleanup, supporting both Linux and Windows runners.job-display-configuration.yml) and resource cleanup (job-cleanup-deployment.yml), allowing for targeted and maintainable job definitions. [1] [2]Environment and Configuration Improvements:
Deployment and Cleanup Automation:
Platform Support:
deploy-linux.yml) and Windows (deploy-windows.yml), each leveraging the orchestrator for platform-specific deployment flows. [1] [2]Testing and Notification Integration:
These changes collectively modernize the deployment pipeline, making it more modular, maintainable, and easier to extend for future requirements.
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Golden Path Validation
Deployment Validation