Skip to content

Microscope SLM integration #904

@juliomateoslangerak

Description

@juliomateoslangerak

I'm starting to look into the integration of microscope's SLM into cockpit and I'd had a few questions on this. Just for reference and if you want to comment. Probably is more efficient to discuss this in the next meeting.

  • in devices there are two modules microscopeCamera and microscopeDevice with several devices (subclasses of microscopeBase. Any particular reason to move camera to a separate module? What should I do with the SLM?
  • if I understand well the layering is device_handler>cockpit_device>microscope but I don't see an slm handler for the current boulderSLM.. What am I missing. Is it just a generic handler? What are handler and device's responsibilities?
  • We discussed about where to put the logic for the 3D-SIM pattern generation. Now it's a kind of mix between the boulder remote and cockpit's device. The idea was to put it into a third package sitting between cockpit and microscope. Am I right saying this? If so, would if be better to work on this before and simplify drastically the changes in cockpit?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions