The references to the oasis technical committee and doc is incorrect

[mverburg]

The link to the oasis TC in the spec is incorrect.

I think this might be the correct link.
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ws-caf

On top of that I haven't been able to locate some sort of meaningful link to Long
Running Action transaction model

[mverburg]

My bad, the link to the TC is correct. Not sure how I ended up thinking it was wrong.

However, the second link (that is supposed to point to the Long Running Action transaction model) does not yield any documents. I'd love to make a PR but like said, I haven't been able to find anything meaningful to point it to.

[mmusgrov]

The second link points to https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ws-caf which does exist. I that the one you are referring to?

[mmusgrov]

@mverburg Ah, I believe that you are referring to the referenced draft oasis document. It looks like the OASIS Open group no long archives this draft so I have removed the link.

[mverburg]

@mverburg Ah, I believe that you are referring to the referenced draft oasis document. It looks like the OASIS Open group no long archives this draft so I have removed the link.

Indeed I was referring to that draft. And yes it appears to have been removed. Maybe worth considering replacing it with a link to the 1986 paper where the concept of a saga was introduced: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/cs711/2002fa/reading/sagas.pdf