You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, GEMM and GEMV (and related functions) call scal which is not totally correct. In the original BLAS implementation, first it is checked wether the scaling parameter is 0 or not.
If the scaling parameter is 0, the array is 0 initialized.
This leads to such problems as spurious nan's when computing the result into an uninitialized block of memory for xtensor-blas users.
Currently, GEMM and GEMV (and related functions) call
scal
which is not totally correct. In the original BLAS implementation, first it is checked wether the scaling parameter is0
or not.If the scaling parameter is 0, the array is 0 initialized.
This leads to such problems as spurious nan's when computing the result into an uninitialized block of memory for xtensor-blas users.
Ref: xtensor-stack/xtensor-blas#75
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: