-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only one task listed on the tasks dashboard #613
Comments
+1 faced with the same issue, nothing in the logs |
+1 restarting the service seems to solve it but only temporarily |
Same issue here. I'm also only getting one task from /api/tasks. Guessing that is related. |
+1 |
Issue is reproduced in the following case:
|
I'm also able to reproduce like that. I reduced max_tasks to 10 and added a do-nothing periodic task with celery beat to run every 100,000 microseconds to make it easier to test. |
+1 this is number one priority for me at the moment |
Is this issue still active? I see a weird behavior where tasks stop updating in the UI, and the workers all show offline, but the UI is still "working" and the api still seems to work and tasks are still running on the workers. Not sure if it's the same issue? |
This issue should still be active. I am experiencing this bug currently. |
as @AdrianLC said, restart |
I'm having the same issue, and a bunch of others. It's a shame that the best celery monitoring tool breaks down after mere 10000 tasks. |
We're facing the same issue too. Does anyone have any solutions yet? After running Flower for a while on Prod, the number of messages exceeds far from the default max_tasks config(200k succeeded messages compares to 10k), Flower show only ONE latest processed task. |
In some weird cases flower lists only one task on the '/tasks'. There are no JS errors in the console or anything that indicates broken web part.
However every time when I reload the page I see different task so there should be more than one task displayed.
Not sure how to reproduce the issue thought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: