You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When citing a JIS standard that has an international equivalent:
place the international equivalent in a normal note.
When citing a JIS standard that is replaced by another JIS or an international equivalent, but the target document has technical differences to the original JIS:
place the international equivalent in a normal note.
describe the differences in a "note underlined with dotted lines".
When a quoted International Standard is cited directly without replacing it with a JIS:
put the JIS corresponding to the quoted International Standard underlined with a dotted line as reference information
This is clearly a "special note with dotted underline".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
that is quite interesting how the underlines "left extend" to cover the "note" but not the "example".
i am sorry i have never seen this before. perhaps they can only be "determined" by a human?
sorry i cannot add anything to this...
ronaldtse
changed the title
Implement dotted underline (or just repurpose underline?)
Implement special note with dotted underline
Jul 16, 2024
@ReesePlews yes, I just reread the contents, and think this can only be determined by human. So this note is a special note that is entirely underlined from the "NOTE" label to the end of its contents.
thanks @ronaldtse for checking this more. not sure what this adds to the document. the original feedback came from HTML. i do not expect that the dashed underlines are the result of any "grammar / spelling check". i think this requires more consideration as to why it is needed... After August is acceptable in my opinion.
When citing a JIS standard that has an international equivalent:
When citing a JIS standard that is replaced by another JIS or an international equivalent, but the target document has technical differences to the original JIS:
When a quoted International Standard is cited directly without replacing it with a JIS:
This is clearly a "special note with dotted underline".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: