Feature Request: Table showing the Markdown Support by editor

[GeneticallyModifiedAlex]

Pitch

Hi all. I'm proposing a feature similar to the markdown support that is shown in the tools page for each editor.

This would be a page that would combine the support pages of each editor into a single table for the purpose of cross referencing. This would allow new users to be able to easily compare editors on a single page.

The support Green, yellow and red colours would still be present. But the notes would be missing on this page.

The notes for the partial sections will redirect to the that tool's markdown support page.

Acceptance Criteria:

• Each Markdown support element is shown on the combined table's y axis
• Each tool/editor is present on the x axis of the table
• The support for each tool on specified elements are present
• Each specified markdown element matches the markdown support page for that editor/tool (being either Yes, Partial, No)
• All Partially supported elements shown links to the original editors support page so that the user may see the full explanation (notes).

[mrienstra]

I was about to request a similar feature!

A side-by-side (in the same table) comparison would be useful for determining what syntax can be used safely, so that a given Markdown document will render as intended in two (or more) different "tools" -- for example, Obsidian & GitHub. In other words, for determining the subset of features which both tools support.

In some cases, the two "tools" in question might differ in their implementation, making the "Notes" column vital.

It would be nice to provide a toggle for hiding or showing "Notes" when viewing a comparison, and when notes are hidden, show a symbol (e.g. "*") in the "Support" cell, hovering over that cell would show the corresponding note as a tooltip.