Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polarized SANS metadata: test saving via the SANS command interface #38502

Open
rbauststfc opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Polarized SANS metadata: test saving via the SANS command interface #38502

rbauststfc opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Investigation A task to investigate options for future work ISIS Team: LSS Issue and pull requests managed by the LSS subteam at ISIS SANS Issues and pull requests related to SANS
Milestone

Comments

@rbauststfc
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #36147. See the design and requirements documents that are linked on that issue for more context.

It is technically possible to save via the SANS command interface as a final step in the reduction workflow, but this is not functionality that the SANS Group were previously aware of and so is not currently being used. They are keen to start making use of this to streamline their scripted reductions, and it will be particularly important for supporting the Polarized SANS reduction. We should test to ensure that the save functionality is working correctly.

The save is integrated into two workflows in the command interface:

  • From the BatchReduce method.
  • From the WavRangeReduction method (which is more commonly used). This one in particular looks to me like it may not work/work very easily at the moment. It offers a parameter where you can specify to save to file, however for this to work I think you may also need to set some save parameters first using the set_save method. While this method is technically accessible via the command interface, it looks like it has been set up with the purpose of being used internally in the BatchReduce method. We will need to test this and decide if any changes are required to get this working in a user-friendly way.

I've given a rough time estimate if we assume that some changes will be needed to WavRangeReduction.

@rbauststfc rbauststfc added SANS Issues and pull requests related to SANS ISIS Team: LSS Issue and pull requests managed by the LSS subteam at ISIS Investigation A task to investigate options for future work labels Dec 12, 2024
@rbauststfc rbauststfc added this to the Release 6.12 milestone Dec 12, 2024
@rbauststfc rbauststfc moved this from New to Backlog in ISIS LSS Sprint Planning Dec 12, 2024
@rbauststfc rbauststfc moved this to Ready for Development in ISIS Polarised SANS Reduction Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Investigation A task to investigate options for future work ISIS Team: LSS Issue and pull requests managed by the LSS subteam at ISIS SANS Issues and pull requests related to SANS
Projects
Status: Backlog
Status: Ready for Development
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant