You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For starters, thank you & congratulations for your amazing work on this paper. It is incredibly insightful and helpful.
I found an issue in one of the scripts, utils.kernelP(), where the input image tensor has dtype np.uint8. The feature transformations in this function lead to unsigned overflow, especially the last 8 elements of each transformed data point (excluding the 1 at the end). The reason for this is mentioned in this page in the NumPy docs, which mentions that their numerical types are fixed-width. Below are the first pixels of 00-02.JPG before & after feature transformation, with their respective dtypes:
To fix the overflow issue, I added I = I.astype(np.int64) to the function.
I compared the output on the example_images directory with & without overflow. Find a summary of the respective MSE & MAE measures, as well as their averages, below. These metrics are to show how different the values are with and without overflow.
(MSE, MAE) for 00_AWB.png: (36.63265609741211, 4.617997646331787)
(MSE, MAE) for 00_T.png: (27.950292587280273, 4.0814528465271)
(MSE, MAE) for 00_S.png: (54.84620666503906, 5.604139804840088)
(MSE, MAE) for 01_AWB.png: (34.73400115966797, 4.047080039978027)
(MSE, MAE) for 01_T.png: (1.7762006521224976, 0.9251388907432556)
(MSE, MAE) for 01_S.png: (34.41278076171875, 4.021535396575928)
(MSE, MAE) for 02_AWB.png: (34.76441192626953, 4.017171382904053)
(MSE, MAE) for 02_T.png: (34.98468780517578, 3.8246243000030518)
(MSE, MAE) for 02_S.png: (32.551353454589844, 3.45462703704834)
(MSE, MAE) for 03_AWB.png: (6.443303108215332, 1.6022756099700928)
(MSE, MAE) for 03_T.png: (25.568115234375, 3.4743590354919434)
(MSE, MAE) for 03_S.png: (8.789534568786621, 1.9237173795700073)
(MSE, MAE) for 04_AWB.png: (19.582639694213867, 2.3370769023895264)
(MSE, MAE) for 04_T.png: (93.58589935302734, 5.58164119720459)
(MSE, MAE) for 04_S.png: (75.77192687988281, 4.169919013977051)
(MSE, MAE) for 05_AWB.png: (12.317625045776367, 2.122532606124878)
(MSE, MAE) for 05_T.png: (15.938911437988281, 2.534762382507324)
(MSE, MAE) for 05_S.png: (19.560606002807617, 2.326895236968994)
(MSE, MAE) for 06_AWB.png: (80.50083923339844, 6.207443714141846)
(MSE, MAE) for 06_T.png: (69.91217041015625, 6.178401470184326)
(MSE, MAE) for 06_S.png: (82.06550598144531, 6.34844446182251)
(MSE, MAE) for 07_AWB.png: (44.33774948120117, 4.364473342895508)
(MSE, MAE) for 07_T.png: (1.0995233058929443, 0.6863966584205627)
(MSE, MAE) for 07_S.png: (52.520164489746094, 4.696540832519531)
(MSE, MAE) for 08_AWB.png: (8.38996696472168, 1.8781654834747314)
(MSE, MAE) for 08_T.png: (11.96456241607666, 2.202268362045288)
(MSE, MAE) for 08_S.png: (27.575592041015625, 3.3244056701660156)
(MSE, MAE) for 09_AWB.png: (19.39771270751953, 2.680612564086914)
(MSE, MAE) for 09_T.png: (38.685218811035156, 3.597625732421875)
(MSE, MAE) for 09_S.png: (32.00599670410156, 3.630540132522583)
(MSE, MAE) for 10_AWB.png: (8.063882827758789, 1.7296009063720703)
(MSE, MAE) for 10_T.png: (13.180949211120605, 2.331162929534912)
(MSE, MAE) for 10_S.png: (10.85296630859375, 1.9405498504638672)
(MSE, MAE) for 11_AWB.png: (3.2594854831695557, 1.08352792263031)
(MSE, MAE) for 11_T.png: (98.14730834960938, 6.926990509033203)
(MSE, MAE) for 11_S.png: (9.633447647094727, 2.008676052093506)
(MSE, MAE) for 12_AWB.png: (4.093111515045166, 1.3582937717437744)
(MSE, MAE) for 12_T.png: (7.315742492675781, 1.7758421897888184)
(MSE, MAE) for 12_S.png: (7.722217559814453, 1.7602105140686035)
Mean MSE: 30.79321196 Mean MAE: 3.26607999
Please let me know what you think! I'd love to hear your POV.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there!
For starters, thank you & congratulations for your amazing work on this paper. It is incredibly insightful and helpful.
I found an issue in one of the scripts, utils.kernelP(), where the input image tensor has dtype
np.uint8
. The feature transformations in this function lead to unsigned overflow, especially the last 8 elements of each transformed data point (excluding the 1 at the end). The reason for this is mentioned in this page in the NumPy docs, which mentions that their numerical types are fixed-width. Below are the first pixels of00-02.JPG
before & after feature transformation, with their respective dtypes:With Overflow:
Without Overflow:
To fix the overflow issue, I added
I = I.astype(np.int64)
to the function.I compared the output on the
example_images
directory with & without overflow. Find a summary of the respective MSE & MAE measures, as well as their averages, below. These metrics are to show how different the values are with and without overflow.Mean MSE: 30.79321196
Mean MAE: 3.26607999
Please let me know what you think! I'd love to hear your POV.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: