Use of records to contain gen_server's state is widespread in Erlang. Due to the fact that records are in fact just tuples a problem arises when performing relups between release versions that involve state changes. Several solutions are available to overcome this:
The most simple way is just taking the old record that arrives through code_change
and by making several erlang:setelement/2
calls, convert the old tuple to the new one. This is a bit of a hackish solution, but it works.
Ulf Wiger's excellent project parse_trans contains a parse_transform called exprecs that generates methods to manipulate your exported records, one interesting method is '#convert'
which (as the name implies) converts one record to another. It needs the following to work:
- Requesting the parse_transform to process your
gen_server
file. (-compile({parse_transform, exprecs}).
) - Declaring a record with the same definition as your previous version gen_server state, so assuming your gen_server's state record is called
state
you would need to declare a'state__VSN'
record where VSN is the gen_server's version as specified through the-vsn
directive (obtained through theModule:module_info(attributes)
call). - Inform exprecs that we want to generate methods for the
state
record - Invoking the expecs convert method in
code_change
callback to migrate from the old version of the record to the new one (ie.{NewState, _} = Module:'#convert-'(VSN, OldState)
).
Here is a simple example snippet with the relevant entries:
-module(m).
%% this is the current gen_server version, the one we want to upgrade from
%% is 1.0.0
-vsn("1.0.1").
%% ask exprecs to apply the parse transform to this file
-compile({parse_transform, exprecs}).
%% below is the previous state record definition with a new name containing
%% it's version, it only has one field
%% do note that in the 1.0.0 version the record is still named `state`, the
%% renaming to 'state__1.0.0' is just so that exprecs is able to distinguish
%% between versions
-record('state__1.0.0', {
id = 0 :: non_neg_integer(),
}).
%% this is our new state record definition
%% as you can see, we've added a new name field to it
-record(state, {
id = 0 :: non_neg_integer(),
name = <<>> :: binary()
}).
%% ask the exprecs parse transform to generate it's methods
%% for our state record on compilation
-export_records([state]).
%% pattern match on a requested code_change from module version 1.0.0 to 1.0.1
code_change("1.0.0", OldState, Extra) ->
lager:debug("code change from 1.0.0 version has been requested"),
lager:debug(" extra: ~p", [Extra]),
{NewState, _} = m:'#convert-'("1.0.0", OldState),
{ok, NewState};
This plugin offers the choice of injecting the necessary code in gen_server:code_change/3
that takes care of record migration from the old version to the new. The plugin will act when the new version tarball is being generated (hence the tar
provider hook in rebar.config
), it will:
- Scan the
.appup
file forgen_server
's' that need upgrade - Check for the existence of the
state_record
directive. This informs the plugin of two things: the user wants it to perform the code injection and the name of the record that represents the state. An example can be found here. - Extract
gen_server
information from the source and destination releases- Abstract code
- State record definition abstract code
- State record fields structure
- It will then inject into the
gen_server
's destination beam file:- The old state record abstract code
- A method that is in charge of performing the conversion of the state record between the two versions
- An invocation of the above method at the beginning of
gen_server:code_change/3
. This call will be the very first instruction ofcode_change
, so from the user's point of view the state record is already converted when the code change method is called, the old state is kept in theExtra
variable as the tuple{old_state, OldState}
.
The Erlang code that performs the conversion can be found in the priv/
folder, based on a proplist of named record fields for the old and new versions it uses erlang:setelement/3
and erlang:element/2
to populate a new version record, new record fields are filled out with record defaults, update fields are copied, renaming fields is not supported.
In the priv/
folder you can also see the call that is injected into the beginning of the code_change
method, it simply is a call to the conversion method making sure that the original variable names are kept and setting them to their new values.