You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The everyday user definitively won't notice a difference. I still think using luaLaTeX is better than XeLaTeX (which Quarto currently uses by default) or pdfLaTeX (which rmarkdown uses) for various reasons:
the current accessibility improvements (i.e., creating tagged PDFs for blind users) happen for luaLaTeX and pdfLaTeX (but not XeLaTeX)
XeLaTeX is not actively developed anymore
some of the optional features in Pandoc's templates are only supported for luaLateX (e.g., selective ligature suppression)
Font expansion by the TeX package microtype is not supported for XeTeX
Some other reasons are also documented at quarto-dev/quarto-cli#11321 and Quarto will likely default to luaLaTeX in the future.
The major drawback probably is speed, as luaLaTeX is not known for its speed.
I am curious to hear the reasoning behind using lualatex as explicit pdf-engine - can thing in the yaml be omitted so that defaults are used?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: