Which source should we use for Getty AAT terms?

[beaudet]

@azaroth42, thanks for providing a more Linked Art friendly representation of the AAT terms, i.e.

https://data.getty.edu/vocab/aat/300404655

I didn't know about this!

Would you recommend the shacl-validator use the CRM representation rather than the GVP ontology for LA validation purposes? If Getty is committed to continue supporting this format and it's being kept up-to-date with the other representations, I don't anticipate any downside to switching to this instead but figured I should ask.

Thanks!