SKILL.md.tmpl

---
name: gstack
preamble-tier: 1
version: 1.2.0
description: |
  Router for the gstack skill suite. Sends any gstack request to the right skill
  (planning, review, QA, shipping, debugging, docs, security, design). For browser/QA
  and dogfooding it points you at /browse. Use when you invoke gstack without a specific
  skill, or ask "which gstack skill fits this?". (gstack)
allowed-tools:
  - Bash
  - Read
  - AskUserQuestion
triggers:
  - gstack
  - which gstack skill
  - route this with gstack

---

{{PREAMBLE}}

## Route first

This is the gstack router. Its one job is to send the request to the right skill.

1. If the request is about a browser, QA, dogfooding, screenshots, or inspecting a page
   (open a site, test a deploy, take a screenshot, check a flow visually) → invoke `/browse`.
2. Otherwise, route by the rules below. If nothing matches, answer directly.

Best-effort, record which way you routed (never block on it). Set `ROUTE_OUTCOME` to
`browse` (sent to /browse), `routed` (sent to another skill), or `direct` (answered
directly, no skill matched):
```bash
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log --event-type route --skill gstack --outcome ROUTE_OUTCOME --session-id "$_SESSION_ID" 2>/dev/null || true
```

If `PROACTIVE` is `false`: do NOT proactively invoke or suggest other gstack skills during
this session. Only run skills the user explicitly invokes. This preference persists across
sessions via `gstack-config`.

If `PROACTIVE` is `true` (default): **invoke the Skill tool** when the user's request
matches a skill's purpose. Do NOT answer directly when a skill exists for the task.
Use the Skill tool to invoke it. The skill has specialized workflows, checklists, and
quality gates that produce better results than answering inline.

**Routing rules — when you see these patterns, INVOKE the skill via the Skill tool:**
- User describes a new idea, asks "is this worth building", brainstorms, pitches a concept → invoke `/office-hours`
- User asks to spec something out, file an issue, write up a ticket, "turn this into a GitHub issue", "backlog item" → invoke `/spec`
- User asks about strategy, scope, ambition, "think bigger", "what should we build" → invoke `/plan-ceo-review`
- User asks to review architecture, lock in the plan, "does this design make sense" → invoke `/plan-eng-review`
- User asks about design system, brand, visual identity, "how should this look" → invoke `/design-consultation`
- User asks to review design of a plan → invoke `/plan-design-review`
- User asks about developer experience of a plan, API/CLI/SDK design → invoke `/plan-devex-review`
- User wants all reviews done automatically, "review everything" → invoke `/autoplan`
- User reports a bug, error, broken behavior, "why is this broken", "this doesn't work", "wtf", "something's wrong" → invoke `/investigate`
- User asks to test the site, find bugs, QA, "does this work", "check the deploy" → invoke `/qa`
- User asks to just report bugs without fixing → invoke `/qa-only`
- User asks to review code, check the diff, pre-landing review, "look at my changes" → invoke `/review`
- User asks about visual polish, design audit of a live site, "this looks off" → invoke `/design-review`
- User asks to audit the live developer experience, time-to-hello-world → invoke `/devex-review`
- User asks to ship, deploy, push, create a PR, "let's land this", "send it" → invoke `/ship`
- User asks to merge + deploy + verify as one flow → invoke `/land-and-deploy`
- User asks to configure deployment for the project → invoke `/setup-deploy`
- User asks to monitor prod after shipping, post-deploy checks → invoke `/canary`
- User asks to update docs after shipping → invoke `/document-release`
- User asks to write docs from scratch, generate documentation, "document this feature/module" → invoke `/document-generate`
- User asks for a weekly retro, what did we ship, "how'd we do" → invoke `/retro`
- User asks for a second opinion, codex review → invoke `/codex`
- User asks for safety mode, careful mode → invoke `/careful` or `/guard`
- User asks to restrict edits to a directory → invoke `/freeze` or `/unfreeze`
- User asks to upgrade gstack → invoke `/gstack-upgrade`
- User asks to save progress, checkpoint, "save my work" → invoke `/context-save`
- User asks to resume, restore, "where was I" → invoke `/context-restore`
- User asks about security, OWASP, vulnerabilities, "is this secure" → invoke `/cso`
- User asks to make a PDF, document, publication → invoke `/make-pdf`
- User asks to launch a real browser for QA, "open the browser" → invoke `/open-gstack-browser`
- User asks to import cookies for authenticated testing → invoke `/setup-browser-cookies`
- User asks about page speed, performance regression, benchmarks → invoke `/benchmark`
- User asks what gstack has learned, "show learnings" → invoke `/learn`
- User asks to tune question sensitivity, "stop asking me that" → invoke `/plan-tune`
- User asks for code quality dashboard, "health check" → invoke `/health`

**When in doubt, invoke the skill.** A false positive (invoking a skill that wasn't
needed) is cheaper than a false negative (answering ad-hoc when a structured workflow
exists). The skill provides multi-step workflows, checklists, and quality gates that
always produce better results than an ad-hoc answer. If no skill matches, answer
directly as usual.

If the user opts out of suggestions, run `gstack-config set proactive false`.
If they opt back in, run `gstack-config set proactive true`.