Remove more testutil macros #4220
Conversation
Replace calls to `get_htlc_update_msgs` macro to the identically-named function.
Replace calls to `check_closed_event` macro to the identically-named function.
|
I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer! |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4220 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.32% 89.33% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 180 180
Lines 138176 138223 +47
Branches 138176 138223 +47
==========================================
+ Hits 123424 123486 +62
+ Misses 12137 12127 -10
+ Partials 2615 2610 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan_1.2, chan_1.3, true); | ||
| let node_a_reason = ClosureReason::CounterpartyInitiatedCooperativeClosure; | ||
| check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, node_a_reason, [node_b_id], 100000); | ||
| check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, node_a_reason, false, &[node_b_id], 100000); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given we pass in false for is_check_discard_funding 99% of the time, it seems like a more ergonomic API would be to have a check_closed_event function without that parameter that gets used most of the time, and a check_closed_event_internal (or something like that) that does support the parameter for the minority of cases that need it. Thoughts?
|
👋 The first review has been submitted! Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer. |
3 participants
Might be a bit painful to review but this removes 2 other macros from the test utils:
get_htlc_update_msgscheck_closed_event