Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing accuracy filter #348

Closed
PontiacCZ opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

missing accuracy filter #348

PontiacCZ opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@PontiacCZ
Copy link

Recently I was using OSMTracker for collecting railway tracklogs with direct upload to OSM. Always when I turn the logging on, I watch decreasing GNSS accuracy value - "19 m"... "11 m".... "8 m".... and after a couple of seconds I am on stable 1 - 2 m accuracy with about 30 satelites in view.

When loooking at those inaccurate initial seconds I was thinking "I believe these points don't get saved, they would not be useful for anyone".

Well, they do get saved. The question is why? See these screenshots from JOSM:

image

image

image

image

image

What is the point in saving this initial clutter?

How about to create an option in settings:
"Save only trackpoints with accuracy better than ___"

Or at least time-delayed start of capture:
"Start logging after ___ seconds."

@Binnette
Copy link
Collaborator

Close as duplicate of #444

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants