separate limit and request cases so both paths can be sent

[YiscahLevySilas1]

PR Type:

Refactoring

---

PR Description:

This PR refactors the CPU and memory resource checks in the raw.rego files. The changes separate the checks for limits and requests, allowing both paths to be sent. It also updates the alert messages to be more specific and informative.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

rules/resources-cpu-limit-and-request/raw.rego: The CPU resource checks have been separated into distinct checks for limits and requests. Additional checks have been added to verify if CPU limits and requests exceed the minimum or maximum values. Alert messages have been updated to reflect these changes.
rules/resources-memory-limit-and-request/raw.rego: Similar to the CPU resource checks, the memory resource checks have also been separated into distinct checks for limits and requests. Additional checks have been added to verify if memory limits and requests exceed the minimum or maximum values. Alert messages have been updated to reflect these changes.

---

User Description:

Overview

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring resource checks in raw.rego files
• 📝 PR summary: This PR refactors the CPU and memory resource checks in the raw.rego files. The changes separate the checks for limits and requests, allowing both paths to be sent. It also updates the alert messages to be more specific and informative.
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves refactoring of the existing code and addition of new checks which requires understanding of the existing logic and the new checks being added.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are logically separated. The refactoring of the checks for limits and requests into separate paths is a good approach as it allows for more specific alert messages. However, it would be beneficial to add tests to verify the new checks and ensure they are working as expected.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: rules/resources-cpu-limit-and-request/raw.rego
    suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive alert message for the CPU limit and request checks. The current message "Container: %v exceeds CPU-limit or request" does not specify whether the limit or the request was exceeded. [important]
    relevant line: "alertMessage": sprintf("Container: %v exceeds CPU-limit or request", [ container.name]),

  • relevant file: rules/resources-memory-limit-and-request/raw.rego
    suggestion: Similar to the CPU checks, consider using a more descriptive alert message for the memory limit and request checks. The current message "Container: %v exceeds memory-limit or request" does not specify whether the limit or the request was exceeded. [important]
    relevant line: "alertMessage": sprintf("Container: %v exceeds memory-limit or request", [container.name]),

  • relevant file: rules/resources-cpu-limit-and-request/raw.rego
    suggestion: It would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the logic behind the is_limit_exceeded_cpu and is_req_exceeded_cpu functions. This would make the code easier to understand for other developers. [medium]
    relevant line: is_limit_exceeded_cpu(cpu_limit)

  • relevant file: rules/resources-memory-limit-and-request/raw.rego
    suggestion: Similar to the CPU checks, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the logic behind the is_limit_exceeded_memory and is_req_exceeded_memory functions. This would make the code easier to understand for other developers. [medium]
    relevant line: is_limit_exceeded_memory(memory_limit)

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success