Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add more delete / review paths #509

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023
Merged

add more delete / review paths #509

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Oct 1, 2023

PR Type:

Enhancement


PR Description:

This pull request introduces enhancements to various security rules by adding 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths'. These paths provide additional information about the location of potential security issues within the codebase, aiding in their review and potential deletion.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

rules/CVE-2022-0492/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths' to the deny rules related to the CVE-2022-0492 vulnerability.
rules/drop-capability-netraw/raw.rego: Added 'deletePaths' to the deny rules related to the 'drop-capability-netraw' security rule.
rules/exposed-sensitive-interfaces/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the 'exposed-sensitive-interfaces' security rule.
rules/etcd-unique-ca/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the 'etcd-unique-ca' security rule.
rules/ensure-default-service-accounts-has-only-default-roles/raw.rego: Added 'deletePaths' to the deny rules related to the 'ensure-default-service-accounts-has-only-default-roles' security rule.
rules/ensure-that-the-api-server-secure-port-argument-is-not-set-to-0/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the 'ensure-that-the-api-server-secure-port-argument-is-not-set-to-0' security rule.
rules/ensure-that-the-admission-control-plugin-SecurityContextDeny-is-set-if-PodSecurityPolicy-is-not-used/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the 'ensure-that-the-admission-control-plugin-SecurityContextDeny-is-set-if-PodSecurityPolicy-is-not-used' security rule.
rules/CVE-2021-25742/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the CVE-2021-25742 vulnerability.
rules/ensure-that-the-controller-manager-root-ca-file-argument-is-set-as-appropriate/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the 'ensure-that-the-controller-manager-root-ca-file-argument-is-set-as-appropriate' security rule.
rules/ensure-that-the-admission-control-plugin-EventRateLimit-is-set/raw.rego: Added 'reviewPaths' to the deny rules related to the 'ensure-that-the-admission-control-plugin-EventRateLimit-is-set' security rule.


User Description:

Overview

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 1, 2023
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Enhancement of security rules by adding 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths'
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces enhancements to various security rules by adding 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths'. These paths provide additional information about the location of potential security issues within the codebase, aiding in their review and potential deletion.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3
    The PR is quite large with many files changed. However, the changes are mostly similar across files, adding 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths' to various security rules. This makes the review effort moderate.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are consistent across all files. It would be beneficial to ensure that the added 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths' are correctly pointing to the intended locations in the codebase. Also, consider adding tests to verify the correctness of these paths.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: rules/CVE-2022-0492/raw.rego
      suggestion: Ensure that the 'reviewPaths' and 'deletePaths' are correctly pointing to the intended locations in the codebase. [important]
      relevant line: "reviewPaths": failed_path,

    • relevant file: rules/drop-capability-netraw/raw.rego
      suggestion: Make sure that the 'deletePaths' are correctly pointing to the intended locations in the codebase. [important]
      relevant line: "deletePaths": failedPaths,

    • relevant file: rules/exposed-sensitive-interfaces/raw.rego
      suggestion: Ensure that the 'reviewPaths' are correctly pointing to the intended locations in the codebase. [important]
      relevant line: "reviewPaths": result,

    • relevant file: rules/etcd-unique-ca/raw.rego
      suggestion: Make sure that the 'reviewPaths' are correctly pointing to the intended locations in the codebase. [important]
      relevant line: "reviewPaths": [etcdCheckResult.path, apiserverCheckResult.path],

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@yuleib yuleib merged commit 5d37795 into master Oct 2, 2023
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants