use func image.parse_normalized_name to identify docker images

[YiscahLevySilas1]

Overview

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Improvement of docker image identification and registry validation
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused on enhancing the identification and validation of docker images and their registries.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No, the PR does not introduce any apparent security issues. It enhances the security by improving the validation of docker images and their registries.

PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on a specific enhancement. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that verify the new functionality. This would ensure that the changes work as expected and do not introduce any regressions.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: rules/container-image-repository-v1/raw.rego
    suggestion: Consider refactoring the repeated code blocks into a separate function to improve code readability and maintainability. This function could take the kind of workload and the container as parameters and return the appropriate alert message. [medium]
    relevant line: untrusted_image_repo[msga] {

  • relevant file: rules/container-image-repository-v1/raw.rego
    suggestion: The 'image_in_allowed_list' function could be improved by handling the case where the 'allowedlist' is empty or not provided. This would prevent potential errors or unexpected behavior. [important]
    relevant line: image_in_allowed_list(image){

  • relevant file: rules/rule-identify-blocklisted-image-registries-v1/raw.rego
    suggestion: The 'untrusted_or_public_registries' function checks if an image is from an untrusted or public registry. It would be more efficient to return as soon as a match is found, instead of checking all registries. This can be achieved by using the 'any' function in Rego. [medium]
    relevant line: untrusted_or_public_registries(image){

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[dwertent]

@YiscahLevySilas1 Any updates here?

[YiscahLevySilas1]

@YiscahLevySilas1 Any updates here?

Not working properly with the function from kubescape, checking tomorrow with @Daniel-GrunbergerCA if the problem is in the rego or in kubescape

[YiscahLevySilas1]

@YiscahLevySilas1 Any updates here?

Not working properly with the function from kubescape, checking tomorrow with @Daniel-GrunbergerCA if the problem is in the rego or in kubescape

@dwertent problem was in rego, fixed and checked

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success