Skip to content

Conversation

tats-u
Copy link
Contributor

@tats-u tats-u commented Jul 21, 2025

Follow up of #582

Forgot to mention CJK friendly emphasis in README

You can merge this just before a next minor release

@tats-u tats-u force-pushed the readme-cjk-friendly branch from 9662b2d to e41c209 Compare July 21, 2025 10:29
@tats-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

tats-u commented Jul 21, 2025

Found a typo in URL

@kivikakk
Copy link
Owner

Thanks! :)

@kivikakk kivikakk merged commit 59ea15f into kivikakk:main Jul 21, 2025
22 checks passed
@tats-u tats-u deleted the readme-cjk-friendly branch July 21, 2025 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants