You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my experience, "high signal per word ratio" is a more accurate intuition in practice rather than "short". Focusing on "short" alone can lead to unnecessary dilemmas *
I'm curious what the author thinks of the above.
* e.g. when you try to describe concepts that is complex enough to require many words.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dikarel
changed the title
Consider "High signal to word ratio" rather than "short"
Consider "High signal per word ratio" rather than "short"
Jan 21, 2021
I believe "short" is meant to combine with "intuitive" and "descriptive", not to be considered as a standalone principle. And as a non-native English speaker, "High signal per word ratio" is not easy to understand at all to me. Just to add that.
In my experience, "high signal per word ratio" is a more accurate intuition in practice rather than "short". Focusing on "short" alone can lead to unnecessary dilemmas *
I'm curious what the author thinks of the above.
* e.g. when you try to describe concepts that is complex enough to require many words.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: