Draft October 23 Jupyter Security Workshop Agenda

[rpwagner]

I have started a draft workshop agenda in Google Docs for the full-day Jupyter Security Workshop that is part of the 2023 NSF Cybersecurity Summit. The document is publicly viewable, Security Council members have edit access. Other contributors can be granted access.

For reference, here is the workshop proposal and the full Summit program.

Thank you to anyone who has time to provide feedback!

Adding to do list for the workshop next Monday 10/23. I'm going to knock out a few steps this evening.

• Draft this list
• Review the list of attendees, share a breakdown here
• @rcthomas and @rpwagner contact @fperez about attending a portion
• Review the draft agenda
• Prepare a list of background material for the workshop (tutorials, presentations, Subproject activities, etc.)
• Share the list with the attendees beforehand?
• Discuss the agenda during the 10/17 Security Subproject meeting
• Hold other working meetings as needed
• Finalize the agenda
• Prepare any needed materials (presentations, workspace for documents, etc.)

[rpwagner]

@JasonWeill @rcthomas @Carreau @JosephTLucas please tag whomever you think is interested.

[Carreau]

@juanis2112 is attending I believe.

@fperez Might be nearby, I don't know if he will stop by.

[fperez]

I'll coordinate with @rpwagner and @rcthomas to see if it makes sense for me to swing by. I'd love to but I'm badly overloaded this term, however it may be useful that I stop by for some targeted meeting or discussion. Rick and Rollin can let me know if that's the case and I'll shuffle things in my calendar.

[fperez]

Thanks for the heads up btw @Carreau!

[dlqqq]

@rpwagner I had sent you an email earlier inquiring about how I may help. Did you receive it? I sent it to [rick at ucsd dot edu].

[juanis2112]

Yes, I'll be there as well!

[rpwagner]

Here's a coarse breakdown of the attendees:

• 47 total
• 3 are part of the Security Subproject
• 2 Industry
• 27 University
• 18 Major Facility (e.g., national lab, supercomputer center, telescope)
• 15 locals (8 LBNL or NERSC, 7 Berkeley)
• 6 are clearly security-focused, e.g., part of Trusted CI

Based on the list, I think we have a lot more folks using or deploying Jupyter than contributing to it. That makes me think in terms of providing them whatever useful information we can, plus learning from their experience about best practices and areas for improvement. Also an opportunity to see how some of them may want to contribute.

[rpwagner]

@RRosio, I'm working on the agenda for Monday. Do you think you'll be able to share a few slides on Anaconda's work supporting security in the packages it distributes? Thanks