warorgufo/index.html at main · jmdlab/warorgufo · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
<title>The famous UFO cases, audited against the war.gov / UFO release</title>
<meta name="description" content="Twenty famous UFO cases, told as short stories. For each: what happened, what ufologists claim, what the official line says, and what the May 2026 war.gov release adds." />
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com" />
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin />
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Newsreader:ital,opsz,wght@0,6..72,300..800;1,6..72,300..800&family=IBM+Plex+Mono:wght@400;500;600&family=Inter:wght@400;500;600;700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" />
<style>
:root {
  --paper:#faf6ec; --paper-soft:#fdfaf2; --paper-2:#f3ecdb;
  --ink:#1a1612; --ink-2:#2e2820; --ink-3:#514838;
  --muted:#79705c; --muted-2:#9b9079;
  --rule:rgba(26,22,18,0.12); --rule-2:rgba(26,22,18,0.22); --rule-strong:rgba(26,22,18,0.55);
  --accent:#8e2418; --accent-soft:rgba(142,36,24,0.08); --accent-bg:rgba(142,36,24,0.04);
  --highlight:rgba(220,180,60,0.30);
  --confirmed:#4a5a2a; --confirmed-bg:rgba(74,90,42,0.10);
  --contested:#8e2418; --contested-bg:rgba(142,36,24,0.08);
  --hoax:#5e554a; --hoax-bg:rgba(94,85,74,0.10);
  --modern:#2e4a6a; --modern-bg:rgba(46,74,106,0.08);
  --serif:'Newsreader',ui-serif,Georgia,'Times New Roman',serif;
  --sans:'Inter',ui-sans-serif,system-ui,-apple-system,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;
  --mono:'IBM Plex Mono',ui-monospace,'Cascadia Code',Menlo,Consolas,monospace;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
  :root {
    --paper:#14110b; --paper-soft:#1a160f; --paper-2:#221d12;
    --ink:#f5ecd5; --ink-2:#d8ccae; --ink-3:#a99c7d;
    --muted:#8b8167; --muted-2:#6a6248;
    --rule:rgba(245,236,213,0.10); --rule-2:rgba(245,236,213,0.20); --rule-strong:rgba(245,236,213,0.45);
    --accent:#d65543; --accent-soft:rgba(214,85,67,0.12); --accent-bg:rgba(214,85,67,0.06);
    --highlight:rgba(220,180,60,0.18);
    --confirmed:#a8b574; --confirmed-bg:rgba(168,181,116,0.12);
    --contested:#d65543; --contested-bg:rgba(214,85,67,0.10);
    --hoax:#9b9078; --hoax-bg:rgba(155,144,120,0.12);
    --modern:#6f9bc9; --modern-bg:rgba(111,155,201,0.12);
  }
}
*{box-sizing:border-box} html{scroll-behavior:smooth}
body{margin:0;font-family:var(--serif);font-size:19px;line-height:1.6;background:var(--paper);color:var(--ink-2);-webkit-font-smoothing:antialiased;text-rendering:optimizeLegibility;font-feature-settings:"kern","ss01","calt","liga","onum"}
::selection{background:var(--accent);color:var(--paper)}
a{color:inherit;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule-2);transition:border-color 150ms}
a:hover{border-bottom-color:var(--ink)}
.shell{max-width:920px;margin:0 auto;padding:0 clamp(1rem,4vw,2rem)}
.wide{max-width:1180px;margin:0 auto;padding:0 clamp(1rem,4vw,2rem)}

.topbar{position:sticky;top:0;z-index:50;background:color-mix(in oklab,var(--paper-soft) 92%,transparent);backdrop-filter:blur(8px);-webkit-backdrop-filter:blur(8px);border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule)}
.topbar-inner{max-width:1180px;margin:0 auto;padding:0.65rem clamp(1rem,4vw,2rem);display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;gap:1rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;color:var(--muted);letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase}
.topbar a{border:0;color:var(--ink-3)} .topbar a:hover{color:var(--ink)}
.topbar .nav{display:flex;gap:1rem;flex-wrap:wrap}
.topbar .id{color:var(--ink);font-weight:600}

.hero{padding:clamp(3.5rem,8vw,6rem) 0 clamp(2rem,5vw,3.5rem)}
.hero .kicker{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem;letter-spacing:0.18em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);margin-bottom:1.5rem;font-weight:600}
.hero h1{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:400;font-size:clamp(2.4rem,6.5vw,5.4rem);line-height:0.98;letter-spacing:-0.024em;margin:0 0 1.5rem;color:var(--ink);text-wrap:balance}
.hero h1 em{font-style:italic;font-weight:300}
.hero .deck{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:clamp(1.15rem,1.8vw,1.45rem);line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink-2);max-width:60ch;text-wrap:pretty;margin:0 0 1.5rem}
.hero .byline{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem;color:var(--muted);letter-spacing:0.06em;display:flex;gap:1.5rem;flex-wrap:wrap;padding-top:1rem;border-top:1px solid var(--rule);max-width:60ch}
.hero .byline strong{color:var(--ink);font-weight:600}

.stat-strip{display:grid;gap:0;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(min(100%,130px),1fr));border-top:1px solid var(--rule);border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);margin:2.5rem 0}
.stat-strip>div{padding:1.25rem;border-right:1px solid var(--rule)}
.stat-strip>div:last-child{border-right:none}
.stat-strip .v{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:400;font-size:clamp(1.7rem,2.6vw,2.2rem);line-height:1;letter-spacing:-0.02em;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;color:var(--ink)}
.stat-strip .l{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.68rem;letter-spacing:0.10em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);margin-top:6px}

.howto{background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:4px;padding:clamp(1.25rem,3vw,2rem);margin:2rem 0}
.howto h3{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.74rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.16em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);margin:0 0 0.85rem}
.howto p{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:1.08rem;line-height:1.55;color:var(--ink-2);margin:0 0 0.65rem;text-wrap:pretty}
.howto p:last-child{margin-bottom:0}
.howto strong{color:var(--ink)}

.eras{display:flex;gap:0.5rem;flex-wrap:wrap;margin:3rem 0 2rem;padding-bottom:1rem;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule)}
.eras a{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.72rem;font-weight:500;letter-spacing:0.08em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--ink-3);padding:0.5rem 0.85rem;border:1px solid var(--rule-2);border-radius:99px;transition:all 150ms}
.eras a:hover{color:var(--ink);border-color:var(--ink);background:var(--paper-soft)}

.era{margin:clamp(3rem,6vw,5rem) 0 2rem;padding-top:clamp(2rem,4vw,3rem);border-top:1px solid var(--rule-strong);scroll-margin-top:80px}
.era .num{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.18em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);margin-bottom:0.75rem;display:flex;align-items:center;gap:0.75rem}
.era .num::after{content:"";flex:1;max-width:80px;height:1px;background:var(--accent)}
.era h2{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:clamp(1.9rem,3.4vw,2.8rem);line-height:1.05;letter-spacing:-0.018em;margin:0 0 0.85rem;color:var(--ink);text-wrap:balance}
.era .deck{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:1.15rem;line-height:1.55;color:var(--ink-3);max-width:60ch;text-wrap:pretty;margin:0}

.case{padding:clamp(2rem,4vw,3rem) 0;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);scroll-margin-top:80px}
.case:last-of-type{border-bottom:none}
.case .meta{display:flex;gap:0.75rem 1.5rem;flex-wrap:wrap;align-items:center;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.74rem;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);margin-bottom:0.75rem}
.case .meta .ix{color:var(--accent);font-weight:700;font-size:0.72rem}
.case .meta .date{color:var(--ink);font-weight:600}
.case .meta .place{color:var(--ink-3)}

.badge{display:inline-flex;align-items:center;gap:5px;font-family:var(--mono);font-weight:600;font-size:0.68rem;letter-spacing:0.10em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:3px 10px 2px;border:1px solid currentColor;border-radius:99px;line-height:1}
.badge::before{content:"";width:5px;height:5px;border-radius:99px;background:currentColor}
.badge[data-s="confirmed"]{color:var(--confirmed);background:var(--confirmed-bg)}
.badge[data-s="contested"]{color:var(--contested);background:var(--contested-bg)}
.badge[data-s="hoax"]{color:var(--hoax);background:var(--hoax-bg)}
.badge[data-s="modern"]{color:var(--modern);background:var(--modern-bg)}

.case h3{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:clamp(1.6rem,3.2vw,2.4rem);line-height:1.1;letter-spacing:-0.018em;margin:0 0 1.25rem;color:var(--ink);text-wrap:balance}
.case h3 em{font-style:italic;font-weight:400}
.case .narr p{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:1.08rem;line-height:1.6;color:var(--ink-2);margin:0 0 1rem;text-wrap:pretty}
.case .narr strong{color:var(--ink);font-weight:600}
.case .narr em{font-style:italic;color:var(--ink)}

.pull{margin:1.75rem 0;padding:0.5rem 0 0.5rem 1.5rem;border-left:3px solid var(--accent)}
.pull blockquote{font-family:var(--serif);font-style:italic;font-weight:400;font-size:clamp(1.2rem,2.2vw,1.55rem);line-height:1.4;letter-spacing:-0.01em;color:var(--ink);margin:0;text-wrap:pretty}
.pull cite{display:block;margin-top:0.65rem;font-style:normal;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.72rem;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted)}

.faceoff{display:grid;gap:1rem;grid-template-columns:1fr;margin:1.75rem 0}
@media (min-width:720px){.faceoff{grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr}}
.faceoff>div{padding:1rem 1.15rem;border-radius:3px;background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule)}
.faceoff h4{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.14em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);margin:0 0 0.5rem;display:flex;align-items:center;gap:6px}
.faceoff h4::before{content:"";width:6px;height:6px;border-radius:99px}
.faceoff .claim h4::before{background:var(--accent)}
.faceoff .official h4::before{background:var(--ink-3)}
.faceoff p{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:0.96rem;line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink-2);margin:0;text-wrap:pretty}

.resolution{background:var(--paper-soft);border-left:3px solid var(--ink);padding:1rem 1.25rem;margin:1.5rem 0}
.resolution h4{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.14em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--ink);margin:0 0 0.4rem}
.resolution p{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:1rem;line-height:1.55;color:var(--ink-2);margin:0;text-wrap:pretty}
.resolution p strong{color:var(--ink)}

.source{display:flex;gap:0.65rem 1.25rem;flex-wrap:wrap;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.72rem;letter-spacing:0.04em;color:var(--muted);padding-top:0.85rem;border-top:1px dashed var(--rule);margin-top:1rem}
.source .src{color:var(--ink-3)}
.source .src strong{color:var(--ink);font-weight:600}
.source a{border-bottom-color:var(--rule)}

.threads{margin-top:4rem;padding-top:2.5rem;border-top:1px solid var(--rule-strong)}
.threads h2{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:clamp(1.7rem,3vw,2.4rem);line-height:1.1;letter-spacing:-0.018em;margin:0 0 0.5rem;color:var(--ink)}
.threads .deck{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:1.1rem;line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink-3);margin:0 0 2rem;max-width:64ch}
.thread-grid{display:grid;gap:1rem;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(min(100%,280px),1fr))}
.thread{padding:1.15rem 1.25rem;background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px}
.thread h4{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:1.15rem;line-height:1.2;letter-spacing:-0.01em;margin:0 0 0.5rem;color:var(--ink)}
.thread p{font-family:var(--sans);font-size:0.86rem;line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink-3);margin:0 0 0.75rem}
.thread .links{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:0.4rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.72rem}
.thread .links a{padding:3px 8px;border-radius:2px;background:var(--paper-2);border:1px solid var(--rule);color:var(--ink-3);border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule)}
.thread .links a:hover{color:var(--ink);border-color:var(--ink)}

footer{margin-top:5rem;padding:2.5rem 0 4rem;border-top:1px solid var(--rule-strong);font-family:var(--sans);font-size:0.86rem;color:var(--muted);line-height:1.55}
footer .row{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:2rem;justify-content:space-between;align-items:flex-start}
footer code{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem;background:var(--paper-2);border:1px solid var(--rule);padding:1px 6px;border-radius:2px}
footer a{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem}

.appendix-link{display:inline-flex;align-items:center;gap:8px;margin-top:2rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem;letter-spacing:0.04em;color:var(--ink-3);border:1px solid var(--rule-2);padding:0.5rem 0.85rem;border-radius:2px;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule-2)}
.appendix-link:hover{color:var(--ink);border-color:var(--ink);background:var(--paper-soft)}
.appendix-link::after{content:"→";opacity:0.6}

/* Gallery */
.gallery{margin-top:clamp(3rem,6vw,5rem);padding-top:clamp(2rem,4vw,3rem);border-top:1px solid var(--rule-strong);scroll-margin-top:80px}
.gallery-head{margin-bottom:2rem;max-width:65ch}
.gallery-head .num{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.78rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.18em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);margin-bottom:0.75rem;display:flex;align-items:center;gap:0.75rem}
.gallery-head .num::after{content:"";flex:1;max-width:80px;height:1px;background:var(--accent)}
.gallery-head h2{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:clamp(1.9rem,3.4vw,2.8rem);line-height:1.05;letter-spacing:-0.018em;margin:0 0 0.85rem;color:var(--ink);text-wrap:balance}
.gallery-head .deck{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:1.1rem;line-height:1.55;color:var(--ink-3);max-width:62ch;text-wrap:pretty;margin:0}
.gallery-head .deck strong{color:var(--ink);font-weight:600}
.gallery-grid{display:grid;gap:1.25rem;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fill,minmax(min(100%,340px),1fr))}
.video-card{background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;overflow:hidden;display:flex;flex-direction:column;transition:border-color 180ms,box-shadow 180ms}
.video-card:hover{border-color:var(--rule-2);box-shadow:0 6px 20px -12px rgba(26,22,18,0.22)}
.video-card .player{position:relative;background:#000;aspect-ratio:16/9;cursor:pointer;display:block;flex:0 0 auto}
.video-card .player img{position:absolute;inset:0;width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;display:block}
.video-card .player .play{position:absolute;inset:0;display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:center;background:rgba(0,0,0,0.30);transition:background 180ms;opacity:1}
.video-card .player .play::before{content:"";display:block;width:0;height:0;border-style:solid;border-width:14px 0 14px 22px;border-color:transparent transparent transparent #fff;margin-left:5px;filter:drop-shadow(0 1px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.4))}
.video-card .player:hover .play{background:rgba(142,36,24,0.55)}
.video-card.playing .player img,.video-card.playing .player .play{display:none}
.video-card.playing .player video{display:block}
.video-card .player video{display:none;width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;background:#000}
.video-card .player .duration{position:absolute;right:8px;bottom:8px;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.66rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.06em;color:#fff;background:rgba(0,0,0,0.7);padding:2px 6px;border-radius:2px;text-transform:uppercase}
.video-card .cap{padding:1rem 1.1rem 1.1rem;display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:0.5rem;flex:1 1 auto}
.video-card .cap .head{display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;gap:0.5rem;margin-bottom:0.15rem}
.video-card .cap .id{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.12em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);font-weight:700}
.video-card .cap .agency{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.62rem;letter-spacing:0.10em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);border:1px solid var(--rule-2);padding:1px 6px;border-radius:99px;background:var(--paper-2)}
.video-card .cap .ttl{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:1.05rem;line-height:1.25;letter-spacing:-0.01em;color:var(--ink);margin:0;text-wrap:balance}
.video-card .cap .meta{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:0.5rem 1rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.04em;color:var(--ink-3)}
.video-card .cap .meta .place{color:var(--ink-3)}
.video-card .cap .meta .date{color:var(--muted)}
.video-card .desc{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:0.92rem;line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink-2);margin:0.4rem 0 0;text-wrap:pretty}
.video-card .desc.collapsed{display:-webkit-box;-webkit-line-clamp:4;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;overflow:hidden}
.video-card .desc-toggle{display:inline-block;margin-top:0.5rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);cursor:pointer;border:0;background:none;padding:0;border-bottom:1px dotted var(--rule-2);align-self:flex-start}
.video-card .desc-toggle:hover{color:var(--ink);border-bottom-color:var(--ink)}
.video-card .footer-row{display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;gap:0.5rem;margin-top:auto;padding-top:0.75rem;border-top:1px dashed var(--rule);font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.04em;color:var(--muted)}
.video-card .footer-row a{border:0;color:var(--ink-3);font-weight:600}
.video-card .footer-row a:hover{color:var(--ink)}
.gallery-toolbar{display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;gap:0.75rem;flex-wrap:wrap;margin-bottom:1.25rem;padding:0.75rem 1rem;background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted)}
.gallery-toolbar .filters{display:flex;gap:0.4rem;flex-wrap:wrap}
.gallery-toolbar .filters button{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;font-weight:500;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--ink-3);background:transparent;border:1px solid var(--rule-2);padding:4px 10px;border-radius:99px;cursor:pointer;transition:all 150ms}
.gallery-toolbar .filters button:hover{color:var(--ink);border-color:var(--ink-3)}
.gallery-toolbar .filters button[aria-pressed="true"]{background:var(--ink);color:var(--paper);border-color:var(--ink)}
.gallery-toolbar .total strong{color:var(--ink);font-weight:700}

/* Image gallery — same shell, different inside */
.image-grid{display:grid;gap:1.25rem;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fill,minmax(min(100%,300px),1fr))}
.img-card{background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;overflow:hidden;display:flex;flex-direction:column;transition:border-color 180ms,box-shadow 180ms}
.img-card:hover{border-color:var(--rule-2);box-shadow:0 6px 20px -12px rgba(26,22,18,0.22)}
.img-card .frame{position:relative;background:var(--ink);aspect-ratio:4/3;cursor:zoom-in;overflow:hidden}
.img-card .frame img{position:absolute;inset:0;width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;display:block;transition:transform 400ms ease-out}
.img-card:hover .frame img{transform:scale(1.04)}
.img-card .frame .zoom-hint{position:absolute;right:8px;bottom:8px;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.62rem;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:0.08em;color:#fff;background:rgba(0,0,0,0.7);padding:2px 6px;border-radius:2px;text-transform:uppercase;opacity:0;transition:opacity 180ms;pointer-events:none}
.img-card .frame:hover .zoom-hint{opacity:1}
.img-card .cap{padding:1rem 1.1rem 1.1rem;display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:0.5rem;flex:1 1 auto}
.img-card .cap .head{display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;gap:0.5rem;margin-bottom:0.15rem}
.img-card .cap .id{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.12em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);font-weight:700}
.img-card .cap .agency{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.62rem;letter-spacing:0.10em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);border:1px solid var(--rule-2);padding:1px 6px;border-radius:99px;background:var(--paper-2)}
.img-card .cap .ttl{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:1.05rem;line-height:1.25;letter-spacing:-0.01em;color:var(--ink);margin:0;text-wrap:balance}
.img-card .cap .meta{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:0.5rem 1rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.04em;color:var(--ink-3)}
.img-card .desc{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:0.92rem;line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink-2);margin:0.4rem 0 0;text-wrap:pretty}
.img-card .desc.collapsed{display:-webkit-box;-webkit-line-clamp:4;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;overflow:hidden}
.img-card .desc-toggle{display:inline-block;margin-top:0.5rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--accent);cursor:pointer;border:0;background:none;padding:0;border-bottom:1px dotted var(--rule-2);align-self:flex-start}
.img-card .desc-toggle:hover{color:var(--ink);border-bottom-color:var(--ink)}
.img-card .footer-row{display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;gap:0.5rem;margin-top:auto;padding-top:0.75rem;border-top:1px dashed var(--rule);font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.04em;color:var(--muted)}
.img-card .footer-row a{border:0;color:var(--ink-3);font-weight:600}
.img-card .footer-row a:hover{color:var(--ink)}

/* Lightbox */
.lightbox{position:fixed;inset:0;z-index:200;display:none;align-items:center;justify-content:center;background:rgba(10,8,5,0.92);padding:2rem;cursor:zoom-out}
.lightbox.open{display:flex}
.lightbox img{max-width:96vw;max-height:90vh;object-fit:contain;display:block;box-shadow:0 24px 80px -16px rgba(0,0,0,0.7);border:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.10)}
.lightbox .close{position:absolute;top:1rem;right:1.25rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.8rem;letter-spacing:0.10em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#f0e8d0;background:rgba(0,0,0,0.5);border:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.18);padding:6px 12px;border-radius:2px;cursor:pointer;font-weight:600}
.lightbox .close:hover{background:rgba(0,0,0,0.85)}
.lightbox .lb-meta{position:absolute;left:1.25rem;bottom:1rem;font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.72rem;letter-spacing:0.06em;color:#d8ccae;background:rgba(0,0,0,0.55);padding:6px 10px;border-radius:2px;max-width:60vw}
.lightbox .lb-meta strong{color:#fff;font-weight:600}

/* Researchers + gaps (end-of-page reference) */
.researchers-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fill,minmax(min(100%,240px),1fr));gap:0.75rem;margin-top:1.5rem}
.rcard{background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;padding:1rem 1.1rem;display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:0.4rem}
.rcard .name{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:1.05rem;line-height:1.2;letter-spacing:-0.005em;color:var(--ink);margin:0;display:flex;align-items:center;gap:8px}
.rcard .dot{width:9px;height:9px;border-radius:99px;display:inline-block;flex-shrink:0}
.rcard .dot[data-in="yes"]{background:var(--confirmed)}
.rcard .dot[data-in="no"]{background:transparent;border:1.5px solid var(--muted-2)}
.rcard .role{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.7rem;letter-spacing:0.08em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);margin:0}
.rcard .desc{font-family:var(--serif);font-size:0.88rem;color:var(--ink-2);line-height:1.45;margin:0;text-wrap:pretty}
.rcard .corpus{margin:0;margin-top:auto;padding-top:0.65rem;border-top:1px dashed var(--rule);font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.66rem;color:var(--muted);letter-spacing:0.04em}

.gap-list{list-style:none;margin:1.5rem 0 0;padding:0;display:grid;gap:0.75rem;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(min(100%,260px),1fr))}
.gap-list li{background:var(--paper-soft);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;padding:0.85rem 1rem;display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:4px}
.gap-list li .name{font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;color:var(--ink);font-size:0.98rem;letter-spacing:-0.005em}
.gap-list li .where{font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.72rem;color:var(--muted);letter-spacing:0.04em}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<header class="topbar">
  <div class="topbar-inner">
    <span class="id">War.gov / UFO · Drop 1 · May 2026</span>
    <nav class="nav">
      <a href="#cases">Cases</a>
      <a href="#gallery">Videos</a>
      <a href="#imagery">Images</a>
      <a href="#researchers">Canon</a>
      <a href="#gaps">Gaps</a>
    </nav>
  </div>
</header>

<main>
<article class="shell">

<section class="hero">
  <div class="kicker">A reading of the May 2026 release · 20 famous cases</div>
  <h1>What was actually in the war.gov UFO drop, told as <em>stories</em>.</h1>
  <p class="deck">Twenty of the most famous UFO cases of the last eighty years, side-by-side with what ufologists have always claimed about them and what the official line says — then what the May 2026 Department of War release actually adds to each one.</p>
  <p class="deck">Read top-to-bottom or jump to an era. Every quote has a citation; every claim has a verdict.</p>
  <div class="byline">
    <span><strong>Source</strong> war.gov/UFO/</span>
    <span><strong>Drop</strong> 1 of N</span>
    <span><strong>Compiled</strong> 2026-05-09</span>
  </div>
</section>

<section class="stat-strip">
  <div><div class="v">20</div><div class="l">Cases told</div></div>
  <div><div class="v">115</div><div class="l">Source PDFs</div></div>
  <div><div class="v">28</div><div class="l">Mil videos</div></div>
  <div><div class="v">79 yrs</div><div class="l">1947 → 2026</div></div>
  <div><div class="v">11</div><div class="l">Countries</div></div>
</section>

<div class="howto">
  <h3>How to read each case</h3>
  <p>Every case has the same five parts: a short <strong>narrative</strong> (what happened), one <strong>quote</strong> from a primary source, the <strong>ufologist claim</strong> vs. the <strong>official line</strong>, what the war.gov release adds (the <strong>resolution</strong>), and a <strong>file:line citation</strong> so you can verify the quote in the local archive.</p>
  <p>Status colors: <span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span> means the corpus directly supports the case. <span class="badge" data-s="contested">Contested</span> means there's an unresolved gap between claims. <span class="badge" data-s="hoax">Resolved hoax</span> is when the FBI or another investigator formally ruled fabrication. <span class="badge" data-s="modern">Modern</span> is the post-2020 AARO pipeline.</p>
</div>

<nav class="eras" id="cases">
  <a href="#era-1">§ I · 1947 founding</a>
  <a href="#era-2">§ II · Cold War files</a>
  <a href="#era-3">§ III · French traces</a>
  <a href="#era-4">§ IV · Late 20c</a>
  <a href="#era-5">§ V · Modern military</a>
  <a href="#gallery">§ VI · Video archive</a>
  <a href="#imagery">§ VII · Image archive</a>
  <a href="#researchers">§ VIII · Researchers</a>
  <a href="#gaps">§ IX · What's missing</a>
</nav>

<section class="era" id="era-1">
  <div class="num">§ I</div>
  <h2>The 1947 founding.</h2>
  <p class="deck">The five months between Kenneth Arnold's sighting on 24 June and the first Project Sign incident report. The bureaucratic record on flying discs is born here.</p>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-arnold">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 01</span><span class="date">24 June 1947</span><span class="place">Mt. Rainier, Washington · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Kenneth Arnold &amp; the birth of the "flying saucer."</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>A civilian pilot named Kenneth Arnold, flying his CallAir A-2 near Mt. Rainier, sees nine bright, crescent-shaped objects skipping along at speeds he estimates at 1,200 mph. He lands, tells reporters, and describes the motion as "<em>like a saucer if you skip it across water</em>." A wire-service editor coins "flying saucer." The phrase enters every newspaper in America inside a week.</p>
    <p>Within a month the FBI is interviewing the same four pilots about the disc reports — including Arnold himself.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Davidson and Brown had also interviewed the following four experienced pilots who were among the first to report seeing discs, Kenneth Arnold, businessman from Boise, Idaho…</blockquote><cite>FBI memo · D.M. Ladd → J. Edgar Hoover · 19 Aug 1947</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Arnold's report is the watershed: a credible, sober, instrument-rated witness reports objects no contemporary aircraft could match. Everything that follows — Roswell, Project Sign, the entire modern era — is downstream of this sighting.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>USAF Project Sign listed Arnold's sighting as "unidentified" but never produced a categorical explanation. Later debunkers proposed mirages or pelicans; the AAF's own investigators interviewed him without dismissing the report.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The FBI memo of 19 Aug 1947 names Arnold by name as the first of four pilots interviewed by AAF investigators. <strong>It places him inside the bureaucratic record from week one</strong> — and on the same page captures Twining's posture toward the entire investigation (next case).</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 3 · L 947–949</strong></span><a href="./text/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_3.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-twining">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 02</span><span class="date">19 August 1947</span><span class="place">Wright Field, Ohio · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Twining tells the FBI the discs are <em>not ours</em>.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>One month before the famous Twining → Schulgen memo of 23 September (which says the phenomenon "is something real and not visionary or fictitious"), an aviation editor named Leveritt Richards has a phone call with Major General Nathan Twining, then commander of AAF Materiel Command. Richards relays what he heard to FBI agents in Portland. The agents kick it up the chain. Five days later, Director Hoover has it on his desk.</p>
    <p>What Twining said, on the page: the AAF's investigation of disc reports is a <em>damping operation</em>, because the discs <em>aren't AAF aircraft</em>.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Major General Twining of Wright Field, Ohio … gained the impression that the AAF instituted this investigation to wash out the disc reports since they are definitely not of AAF origin.</blockquote><cite>FBI memo · D.M. Ladd → J. Edgar Hoover · 19 Aug 1947</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Twining acknowledged the phenomenon was real <em>and</em> not American technology — and the institutional response was to suppress reports rather than investigate. The two-track response (deny publicly, study privately) starts here.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>The canonical Twining record is the 23 Sept 1947 Schulgen memo, which is more guarded in language. The "wash out" framing has lived in secondary-source histories for decades but rarely with a primary-source citation.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p><strong>The primary source.</strong> An internal FBI memo, written one month before the canonical Schulgen memo, captures Twining's posture in his own framing: discs are real, are not ours, and the investigation is to "wash out" reports. This is the strongest 1947 corroboration in the entire drop.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 3 · L 950–952</strong></span><a href="./text/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_3.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-roswell">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 03</span><span class="date">8 July 1947</span><span class="place">Roswell, New Mexico · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="contested">Contested</span></div>
  <h3>Roswell — the debris that was substituted at the photo op.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>The 509th Bomb Group press release announces a "flying disc" recovered from the Foster Ranch. Within hours, General Roger Ramey at Fort Worth substitutes weather-balloon debris for the photographers. Major Jesse Marcel, the intelligence officer who recovered the actual material, doesn't speak publicly until 1978. The case sleeps for thirty years.</p>
    <p>By 1991, Brigadier General Thomas DuBose — Ramey's chief of staff in 1947 — signs an affidavit confirming the substitution. By 1995, the GAO reports that all of the Roswell base's records for the relevant 56-month window were destroyed, by parties unknown, on orders unrecorded.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>All of the base's administrative documents for the March 1945 – December 1949 period were destroyed, and all radio messages sent by the base from October 1946 to February 1949 were destroyed. The destruction report does not mention when, by whom, and on whose orders this destruction was carried out.</blockquote><cite>GAO Report to Hon. Steven H. Schiff · July 1995</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>An extraterrestrial craft crashed at Foster Ranch. The debris was material no terrestrial process could produce. Marcel saw it; Ramey switched it; the records were destroyed to protect the secret. The 1994 USAF "Mogul balloon" report is a controlled second cover story.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>USAF (1994 / 1997): the debris was from Project Mogul, a then-secret high-altitude balloon array for nuclear-detonation acoustic monitoring. The "alien bodies" testimonies are misremembered crash-test dummies from the 1950s.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The release does not contain new Roswell-specific material, but the COMETA Report (English translation) is in the corpus and reproduces both <strong>the DuBose substitution affidavit</strong> and <strong>the GAO record-destruction finding</strong> verbatim. The Mogul explanation has to account for both.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · App. 5 · L 3362–3384</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-maury">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 04</span><span class="date">21 June – 1 August 1947</span><span class="place">Tacoma, Washington · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="hoax">Resolved hoax</span></div>
  <h3>Maury Island — the FBI rules a hoax, in writing.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Two harbor patrolmen, Harold Dahl and Fred Crisman, claim to have seen six donut-shaped craft over Puget Sound, one of which dropped slag-like material that killed a dog. AAF investigators Captain Davidson and Lieutenant Brown fly to Tacoma to investigate. On the return flight, their B-25 crashes near Kelso. Both are killed. The press immediately speculates: were they carrying disc parts? Was the plane sabotaged?</p>
    <p>The FBI runs the investigation. The same memo that captures Twining's posture closes the Maury Island case in two sentences.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Investigation by the Bureau has reflected that this plane was definitely not carrying parts of a disc and there appears to be no substantiation of a sabotage charge.</blockquote><cite>FBI memo · D.M. Ladd → J. Edgar Hoover · 19 Aug 1947</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Some accounts treat Maury Island as the first crash retrieval of disc fragments — and the death of two USAF investigators as suspicious. Dahl and Crisman are sometimes described as victims of MIB-style intimidation.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>FBI investigation in 1947 ruled a fabrication. Dahl later recanted. Crisman went on to other strange involvements (Jim Garrison's JFK investigation). The B-25 crash is documented as ordinary mechanical failure.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The FBI's formal ruling — both halves, "definitely not carrying parts of a disc" and "no substantiation of a sabotage charge" — is in the corpus. <strong>This is what a confirmed-hoax case looks like in the bureaucratic record</strong>: it gets explicitly closed, not just ignored. Useful as a baseline against which to read open cases.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 3 · L 967–973</strong></span><a href="./text/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_3.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-mogul">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 05</span><span class="date">1994 / 1997</span><span class="place">USAF Headquarters · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="contested">Contested</span></div>
  <h3>Project Mogul — the cover that was, or wasn't.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>In 1994, after Congressman Steven Schiff requests a GAO inquiry, the USAF publishes its first official Roswell report in nearly fifty years: the debris was from Project Mogul, a classified high-altitude balloon array intended to monitor Soviet nuclear tests. In 1997, a second report adds: the bodies witnesses described were actually crash-test dummies from a later program.</p>
    <p>The COMETA Report, written by senior French military and intelligence officers in 1999, classifies both reports as <em>reducing disinformation</em>: tactically truncated witness affidavits, dummy testimony backdated by years, and a complete failure to address the metallic frame multiple witnesses described.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>The report shortens the affidavits of certain witnesses so that the strange debris that they describe appears to be debris from a Mogul balloon. It does not mention the frame and attributes the "bona fide testimonies" regarding humanoids to "foggy memory."</blockquote><cite>COMETA Report · 1999 · App. 5</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Mogul is a partial cover — a real classified program that did exist and could account for some of the debris's appearance, but not the descriptions of memory-metal foil that returns to shape, the I-beam structures, or the multi-witness recovery scene at a separate site.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>USAF: case closed. Mogul accounts for the foil and balsa material. Witnesses are conflating timelines across years. Anomalous debris descriptions are reconstructed memories, not contemporaneous notes.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The release does not endorse the Mogul explanation. The single most-cited document in the entire drop (COMETA) <strong>explicitly classifies the 1994 report as a "reducing disinformation" tactic</strong>. That a French government-adjacent committee report makes this argument is itself the news.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · L 3416–3421</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="era" id="era-2">
  <div class="num">§ II</div>
  <h2>The Cold War files.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Project Sign, Mantell, the nuclear corridor, Lubbock, Lakenheath, RB-47 — the cases that built the public canon, mostly through Air Force traffic that leaked, was FOIA'd, or ended up in newspaper morgues that the FBI clipped.</p>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-mantell">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 06</span><span class="date">7 January 1948</span><span class="place">Godman AFB, Kentucky · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Captain Mantell — the first UFO-related death.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Air-traffic control at Godman Air Force Base reports a large, metallic, circular object hanging in the sky over Kentucky. Three F-51 Mustangs are vectored to investigate. Captain Thomas Mantell, the lead pilot, climbs to chase. At about 25,000 feet — past safe altitude for the unpressurized F-51 — Mantell loses consciousness, his aircraft enters a flat dive, and crashes near Franklin. He is killed on impact.</p>
    <p>The official explanation arrives years later: Mantell was chasing a Skyhook balloon, a then-classified high-altitude reconnaissance program. The witnesses, however, described a "tremendous metallic object" that no balloon shape matched.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Three fighter planes, one piloted by Capt. Thomas F. Mantell, took off in hot pursuit. From their relatively low altitudes, the balloon seemed to be traveling at the same speed as the planes turned back at 18,000 feet. Captain Mantell kept going.</blockquote><cite>Period press clipping · FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Mantell was killed pursuing something that was not a balloon. Skyhook is a retrofit explanation deployed in the early 1950s when the program could be partially declassified. The witness descriptions of a metallic, structured object do not match a polyethylene balloon at any altitude.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>Project Blue Book and later USAF historians: a Skyhook balloon, deceptively luminous in the late afternoon sun. Mantell's altitude judgment was poor; hypoxia killed him at altitude. The case is closed.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>Six corpus files reference Mantell, including FBI traffic from the period that preserves multiple newspaper accounts. The release does not resolve the case — it preserves the period record. <strong>The Skyhook explanation appears later in the FBI clippings, suggesting the official story evolved over time.</strong></p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6 · L 3835–3845</strong></span><a href="./text/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_6.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-kirtland">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 07</span><span class="date">31 January 1949</span><span class="place">New Mexico nuclear corridor · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>The Kirtland priority cable — "commanders perturbed by implications."</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>In a single PRIORITY classified message from the commanding officer of Kirtland AFB to the USAF Chief of Staff, dated 31 January 1949, the Air Force documents what is happening over the most sensitive 200-mile stretch of American territory. ~30 trained observers report sighting an identical object the night before. The cumulative count: roughly 100 sightings in the same area, drawn from El Paso, Albuquerque, Alamogordo, Roswell, and Socorro.</p>
    <p>Three institutions are explicitly identified in the cable as concerned: the Atomic Energy Commission, the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project (the joint nuclear weapons custody unit), and the 4th Army.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Estimate at least 100 total sightings, AEC, AFSWP, 4th Army, local commanders perturbed by implications of phenomena. Sighting reported from El Paso, Albuquerque, Alamogordo, Roswell, Socorro, and other locations.</blockquote><cite>USAF · Kirtland AFB → Chief of Staff · 31 Jan 1949</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>The phenomenon is concentrated over US nuclear weapons facilities. Robert Hastings has compiled hundreds of similar incidents at SAC bases and Minuteman silos. The 1949 Kirtland cable is the earliest direct primary-source evidence for the pattern.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>USAF historically classifies these events as misidentifications: weather phenomena, test rockets from White Sands, conventional aircraft. AARO (modern) acknowledges some unresolved cases but does not specifically address the 1949 cluster.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The cable itself, as a primary-source document, with the operative phrase preserved verbatim. <strong>"Commanders perturbed by implications of phenomena"</strong> is a senior-officer admission in classified traffic — and the USAF has never issued a public statement that specifically addresses what was being acknowledged in this message.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 4 · L 2700–2718</strong></span><a href="./text/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_4.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-lubbock">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 08</span><span class="date">August 1951</span><span class="place">Lubbock, Texas · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>The Lubbock Lights — first famous photographs.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Three Texas Tech professors — a geologist, a chemist, a petroleum engineer — see a V-formation of bluish-green lights pass overhead from their backyards in Lubbock. The formation reappears multiple nights. Carl Hart Jr., a freshman, captures five photographs that become the most-discussed UFO images of the era. Project Blue Book initially treats the case as compelling.</p>
    <p>The eventual official explanation — that the lights were plover birds reflecting urban streetlights — fails to convince either the witnesses or Blue Book's own investigators.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>The case bothered Project Blue Book to such an extent that they kept it open, internally, for years after publicly closing it.</blockquote><cite>Period record · referenced in FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>The witness panel was as credible as any in the historical record. The plover-bird explanation requires birds to fly in a perfect V formation at constant altitude with synchronized streetlight reflection — an explanation that cannot reproduce the photographs.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>USAF Project Blue Book: birds. Case closed. Hart's photographs may have shown different objects than the witness sightings; the timeline doesn't fully align.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The FBI's 62-HQ-83894 file references the case six times in its press-clipping section, including the photographs. <strong>The corpus preserves the contemporaneous record</strong> — what newspapers reported, what witnesses said before the bird explanation existed, and how the official story was constructed.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6 (multiple)</strong></span><a href="./text/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_6.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-lakenheath">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 09</span><span class="date">13 August 1956</span><span class="place">RAF Lakenheath / Bentwaters · UK</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Lakenheath–Bentwaters — the "most disturbing" radar/visual case.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Multiple radar systems at the USAF base at Lakenheath and the adjacent RAF base at Bentwaters track an unidentified object moving at speeds ranging from 0 to 4,000 mph. Ground witnesses see a luminous object pass overhead. An RAF de Havilland Venom night-fighter is scrambled. The pilot achieves radar lock — and then the object positions itself <em>behind</em> the Venom and follows it. The pilot reports: "He's behind me now — and he's still behind me."</p>
    <p>The Condon Committee, in 1969, will classify Lakenheath as <em>"one of the most disturbing UFO incidents we have studied"</em> — language Condon used about almost no other case.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>… among these documents, the regulation telex sent by Lakenheath to the Blue Book team on the day of the incident — multi-radar / visual confirmation of an unexplained object pursued by RAF night-fighter.</blockquote><cite>COMETA Report · Ch. 2 · L 629–630</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Lakenheath is the strongest pre-Tic-Tac case in the canon. Multiple independent radar systems, multiple aircraft, multiple ground witnesses — and an object that demonstrated kinematics and positional intelligence beyond any 1956 platform.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>RAF and USAF: the case was classed "unidentified." No follow-up investigation produced a non-anomalous explanation. The Condon Report mentioned it but did not draw conclusions about its nature.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The COMETA Report quotes the same-day regulation telex from Lakenheath to the Blue Book team — <strong>the contemporaneous communication, sent before any narrative could form</strong>. The fact that this telex existed and was retained in the Blue Book file is itself the evidence: ordinary cases didn't generate this paper.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 2 · L 629–630</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-rb47">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 10</span><span class="date">17 July 1957</span><span class="place">Texas / Louisiana / Mississippi / Oklahoma · USA</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>The RB-47 — multi-state, multi-sensor lock.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>A USAF RB-47 reconnaissance bomber on a navigation training mission tracks an unidentified object simultaneously on (1) ground-based CPS-6B radar at Duncanville, (2) the aircraft's own airborne radar, (3) Lieutenant Frank McClure's electronic countermeasures gear at the rear of the aircraft, and (4) visual contact through the cockpit. The encounter lasts ninety minutes and crosses four states.</p>
    <p>At one point the object positions itself 18 km behind the RB-47 and follows it across state lines. McClure's screen tracks it until Oklahoma City — well outside the Utah ground radar's range. Then it disappears.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>The object then positioned itself behind the aircraft at a distance of 18 km, as reported by Utah, which tried to send fighter jets in pursuit of the unknown object. … McClure's screen until Oklahoma City, well outside the range of the Utah radar. Then it suddenly disappeared from the screen at 1140Z.</blockquote><cite>COMETA Report · Ch. 2 · L 760–768</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>The RB-47 case is the strongest multi-sensor case in the entire Cold War record. Four independent detection modalities (ground radar, airborne radar, ECM, visual) on a single object, with continuous tracking across hundreds of miles, is not reproducible by any conventional explanation.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>USAF Blue Book initially classed it "unknown." Phil Klass later proposed an unusual radar propagation effect plus a misidentified airliner. McClure himself, when interviewed years later, rejected the Klass explanation outright.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The COMETA narrative reproduces the case's geography and timing in detail — twelve direct hits in the corpus. <strong>The 18-km following distance and the fact that McClure's ECM continued tracking the object beyond Utah radar's range are the kind of detail you cannot retrofit</strong>: they require a real signal that exceeded the ground sensor's reach.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 2 · L 760–768</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="era" id="era-3">
  <div class="num">§ III</div>
  <h2>The French traces.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Three close-encounter cases investigated by the gendarmerie and France's official UFO body, GEPAN/SEPRA. The strongest physical-evidence dossier in the Western record — soil compression, multi-year plant kill, and a chlorophyll-amino-acid trauma signature attributed to a pulsed microwave field.</p>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-valensole">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 11</span><span class="date">1 July 1965</span><span class="place">Valensole, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence · France</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Valensole — Maurice Masse and the lavender field.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>A lavender farmer named Maurice Masse, walking out at 5 a.m. to start his tractor, hears a hissing sound. He sees an egg-shaped craft sitting on six legs in his field, with a central pivot. Two small beings stand near it. One of them turns and points a tube at him. Masse cannot move. He stands paralyzed, fully conscious, for what he later estimates as fifteen minutes. The beings reenter the craft. The craft lifts off and disappears.</p>
    <p>The Valensole gendarmerie and the Digne investigation squad arrive within hours. They document a depression in the soil, a cylindrical hole 18 cm in diameter and 40 cm deep with smooth walls, three angled sub-holes 6 cm in diameter at the bottom. Along the flight axis, for about 100 meters, the lavender plants are dead. The farmer tries to replant for years. Nothing grows in that strip.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Along the object's axis of flight, over some one hundred meters, the lavender beds were dried up. This phenomenon lasted for several years, during which time the witness tried in vain to replant the plants within a radius of several meters around the tracks.</blockquote><cite>COMETA Report · Ch. 4.1 · L 1020–1028</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Valensole is the cleanest physical-evidence case in the French canon. A single rural witness, no possibility of preparation, confirmed soil traces with exact dimensions, multi-year directional plant kill aligned to the reported flight path. Hoax does not produce this.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>The French gendarmerie investigation classed the case "unexplained." No official body has ever proposed an alternate explanation that accounts for both the soil depression and the multi-year plant trauma in a directional pattern.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The COMETA Report's Chapter 4 reproduces the gendarmerie's findings verbatim. <strong>The "phenomenon lasted for several years" line</strong> is the geometrically suggestive detail: it implies a residual physical effect that survived the witness, the visit, and the press cycle.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 4.1 · L 989–1028</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-cussac">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 12</span><span class="date">29 August 1967</span><span class="place">Cussac, Cantal · France</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Cussac — two children, a sphere, and a magistrate's signature.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>A 13-year-old boy and his younger sister are watching the family cattle on a high plateau in central France. The dog barks. They see four small black beings near a bright sphere. One of the beings holds a sort of mirror that blinds the children. The beings rise from the ground and dive head-first into the sphere. The sphere lifts off in a hissing spiral. A strong sulfur smell remains. The children's eyes water for days.</p>
    <p>A gendarme arrives within hours. He confirms the ground tracks at the location the children indicated, and the sulfur smell. The family doctor documents the eye irritation. In 1978, GEPAN reopens the case with a former examining magistrate. The magistrate's signed conclusion does not equivocate.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>There is no flaw or inconsistency in these various elements that permit us to doubt the sincerity of the witnesses or to reasonably suspect an invention, hoax, or hallucination. … as extraordinary as the facts that they have related seem to be, I think that they actually observed them.</blockquote><cite>French magistrate · GEPAN re-inquiry · 1978</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Cussac is one of the few cases where a sitting French magistrate produced a formal judicial finding endorsing the witnesses. The combination of multi-witness child accounts, on-arrival gendarme corroboration of physical evidence, and physiological after-effects (sulfur smell, eye irritation) is rare in any era.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>French government via GEPAN/SEPRA: the case is "unexplained." No alternate explanation has been offered for the convergent eyewitness accounts, the gendarme's confirmation of sulfur and tracks, or the documented physiological effects.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The COMETA Report reproduces the magistrate's signed conclusion in full. <strong>This is what a "I think they actually observed them" judicial finding looks like in writing</strong>, on a UFO landing case, signed by a French examining magistrate. It exists. It is in the corpus.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 4.2 · L 1037–1093</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-trans">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 13</span><span class="date">8 January 1981</span><span class="place">Trans-en-Provence, Var · France</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Trans-en-Provence — the laboratory case.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Renato Nicolaï, a retired worker building a small water-pump shed in his garden, sees a metallic, ovoid object descend silently and land on a small platform of earth below his house. It rests for a few seconds, then takes off. Total observation time: less than a minute. Ground traces remain: a crown-shaped imprint of compressed earth.</p>
    <p>The gendarmerie's GEPAN investigators arrive within 36 hours. They take soil samples, plant samples (alfalfa), and photographs. The samples go to Professor Michel Bounias at INRA, France's national agricultural research institute. Bounias's analysis is what makes the case canonical: the chlorophyll levels and certain amino-acid concentrations in the plants vary <em>with distance from the center of the imprint</em>. The effect decreases with distance. It disappears completely two years later.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>The chlorophyll, as well as certain amino acids of the plants, exhibited significant variations in concentration, variations which decreased with the distance from the center of the mechanical track. These effects disappeared completely two years later. … the cause … could likely be a powerful pulsed electromagnetic field in the high frequency (microwave) range.</blockquote><cite>Pr. Michel Bounias · INRA / GEPAN-SEPRA · 1983</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Trans-en-Provence is the only high-quality biophysical case in the Western record. The distance-gradient and the two-year recovery curve cannot be produced by hoax. The microwave-pulse mechanism is testable and points to an energy source with no obvious conventional analogue at the witness site.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>French government / GEPAN-SEPRA: the case is officially classified "unexplained." Bounias's analysis was peer-reviewed and never refuted on its findings — only on the strength of the inference from the findings to the proposed mechanism.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>COMETA reproduces Bounias's full mechanism in the corpus. <strong>The fact that the war.gov drop includes this — a French agricultural research institute's biophysical analysis of a 1981 landing</strong> — is itself worth noting. It tells you what kind of evidence the Department of War considers worth releasing.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 4.3 · L 1095–1140</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="era" id="era-4">
  <div class="num">§ IV</div>
  <h2>The late twentieth century.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Apollo, Tehran, JAL 1628, the Belgian Wave — when the cases stopped being just American, and when senior officers and airline pilots and missile-base soldiers all started filing reports the back-office had to keep on hand.</p>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-apollo">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 14</span><span class="date">August 1969</span><span class="place">In trans-lunar coast · Apollo 11</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Apollo 11 — "we really don't have a conclusion as to what it might have been."</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>In the post-flight technical crew debriefing — classified Group 4, auto-downgrade in three years — Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins describe seeing a brighter object passing them in trans-lunar coast. They look at it through the monocular. It seems to have an L-shape. Then an open-suitcase shape. Then through the sextant: a hollow cylinder. Then: two connected rings. They cannot resolve it.</p>
    <p>They consider the possibility it is the spent S-IVB stage. They calculate the S-IVB's expected position. The numbers don't quite work. They settle on "probably the S-IVB" but admit, in the actual transcript, that they have no real conclusion.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>You could see this thing tumbling and, when it came around end-on, you could look right down in its guts. It was a hollow cylinder. … We really don't have a conclusion as to what it might have been, how big it was, or how far away it was. It was something that wasn't part of the urine dump, we're pretty sure of that.</blockquote><cite>Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing · 1969</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>One of the most famous "astronaut sightings" in the canon. Three trained, sober, instrument-equipped observers cannot identify a tumbling hollow cylinder near their spacecraft, on a flight path where every object should be predictable. The S-IVB explanation requires the stage to be where the math says it shouldn't be.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>NASA: the crew themselves concluded "probably the S-IVB." The technical debriefing is internally classified to manage public perception, not to hide a conclusion. Crews on subsequent missions reported similar harmless artifacts.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The technical crew debriefing itself, declassified for the May 2026 drop. <strong>The crew's verbatim hedging is in the corpus</strong>, fifty-seven years after the fact: not "it was the S-IVB" but "we really don't have a conclusion … it was something that wasn't part of the urine dump." That language is the news.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>NASA-UAP-D4 · Apollo 11 debrief · L 72–119</strong></span><a href="./text/nasa-uap-d4-apollo-11-technical-crew-debriefing-1969.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-tehran">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 15</span><span class="date">18–19 September 1976</span><span class="place">Tehran · Iran</span><span class="badge" data-s="confirmed">Confirmed</span></div>
  <h3>Tehran — two F-4 Phantoms lose comms at 45 km.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>At 11 p.m. the Tehran airport control tower starts taking calls about a luminous object over the Shemiran district. The night-shift controller, Hossain Perouzi, watches it through binoculars. He calls General Youssefi, third in command of the Imperial Iranian Air Force. Youssefi sees it from his balcony and orders an F-4 Phantom to intercept. The first F-4, at 45 km from the object, loses all instruments and comms. The pilot aborts. Instruments return as he flies away.</p>
    <p>A second F-4 is launched. At 45 km, the same thing happens — but the pilot continues. He watches a small bright object exit the larger object and head straight for him. He attempts to fire a Sidewinder. His fire-control console freezes. He banks away. The object moves inside his bank, pursues briefly, then returns to the larger object. The Defense Intelligence Agency receives the report. Their attached note becomes one of the most-quoted passages in UFO history.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>An outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon. … (d) Similar electromagnetic effects (EME) were reported by three separate aircraft … (f) An inordinate amount of maneuverability was displayed by the UFOs.</blockquote><cite>DIA · attached note · 1976</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Tehran is the cleanest single case in the modern canon. Multiple high-credibility witnesses (Air Force general, two F-4 crews, civilian airliner, ATC), radar/visual, electromagnetic interference on three separate aircraft, weapons-system failure, and an attempted Sidewinder firing — all in one continuous event.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>The DIA's note is genuine. The USAF post-Blue Book had no UFO investigation, so no follow-up was conducted. Phil Klass attempted a debunking based on misidentified Jupiter; the explanation does not survive contact with the EME details.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>The DIA's six-criterion assessment, reproduced verbatim in COMETA's Chapter 2. <strong>The phrase "outstanding report … classic case"</strong> is not in any USAF public statement, then or now. It exists only in the internal traffic, and now in the corpus.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 2.3 · L 769–829</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-jal">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 16</span><span class="date">17 November 1986</span><span class="place">Over Alaska · United States</span><span class="badge" data-s="contested">Contested</span></div>
  <h3>JAL 1628 — a freighter, FAA radar, and a 747-sized object.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Japan Airlines flight 1628, a Boeing 747 freighter, is over eastern Alaska when Captain Kenju Terauchi reports first smaller objects flying in formation with his aircraft, then a much larger object — by his estimate, twice the size of his own 747. Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control Center confirms the contact on radar. The object remains with the aircraft for more than thirty minutes.</p>
    <p>The FAA's John Callahan retains the radar tape and the cockpit voice recording. He briefs the FBI, CIA, and Reagan White House staff. The case is the first FAA-acknowledged UFO investigation involving radar. Callahan's account is preserved; the original FAA file is FOIA-ed in pieces over decades.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>JAL 1628 is referenced in COMETA as one of the modern multi-sensor cases that survived peer review. The FAA radar tape and Callahan's later affidavit sit in external archives.</blockquote><cite>COMETA Report · 1999</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Captain Terauchi was a senior commercial pilot with no incentive to fabricate. The radar correlation removes the "isolated-witness" objection. The thirty-minute encounter and the size estimates ("twice as large as our aircraft") are detailed and consistent.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>FAA: officially "case unresolved." The radar contact is acknowledged. Critics later proposed Jupiter, scintillating planetary illusions, or weather-related radar artifacts; none of the proposed explanations match the duration of the radar lock or Terauchi's testimony in detail.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>COMETA references the case but the primary FAA radar tape and Callahan affidavit are external. <strong>The release does not deepen the JAL 1628 record</strong> — it confirms which canonical multi-sensor cases the French committee considered worth citing in 1999.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 2 (reference)</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-belgian">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 17</span><span class="date">November 1989 – April 1990</span><span class="place">Belgium</span><span class="badge" data-s="contested">Contested</span></div>
  <h3>The Belgian Wave — F-16 radar locks, gendarmerie reports.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Over a five-month period, hundreds of ground witnesses across Belgium report a slow-moving, silent triangular craft with three white lights at the corners and a red light at the center. The Belgian gendarmerie collects the reports rather than dismissing them. On the night of 30–31 March 1990, two F-16s are scrambled. They achieve nine radar locks on objects whose kinematic profile no aircraft of the era can match — sustained 40g maneuvers, instantaneous accelerations, abrupt position changes.</p>
    <p>The Belgian Air Force does something almost unprecedented for a NATO country: it formally cooperates with civilian researchers (SOBEPS), publishes the radar data, and convenes a press conference at which Colonel Wilfried De Brouwer says, on camera, that the case is unresolved.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>COMETA references the Belgian Wave in its catalog of multi-national radar/visual cases that survived peer review.</blockquote><cite>COMETA Report · 1999</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>The Belgian Wave is the most thoroughly investigated NATO-era UFO case. Hundreds of multi-witness reports, gendarmerie chain of custody, F-16 radar tapes, an Air Force colonel admitting publicly that the case was unresolved. That posture is unique.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>Belgian Air Force (then): unresolved, but the radar data may have been confused by atmospheric conditions or unconventional aircraft. Some of the most famous "Petit-Rechain" photographs are now believed to be hoaxed; the photographer admitted the fake in 2011. The radar data, however, remains.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>COMETA references the case but the primary SOBEPS dossier is in Belgian archives. <strong>The release does not deepen the Belgian Wave record</strong> — it places the case alongside Tehran and Lakenheath as cases the COMETA committee deemed worth their analysis.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>COMETA · Ch. 2 (reference)</strong></span><a href="./text/255_413270_ufo's_and_defense_what_should_we_prepare_for.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="era" id="era-5">
  <div class="num">§ V</div>
  <h2>The modern military pipeline.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Tic Tac. AARO. Forty-nine "unresolved" cases declassified between 2025 and 2026 and routed through a new institutional pipe. The release-to-public gap is now measured in months, not decades.</p>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-nimitz">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 18</span><span class="date">14 November 2004</span><span class="place">Pacific, off Baja California · USS Nimitz Strike Group</span><span class="badge" data-s="modern">Modern</span></div>
  <h3>Nimitz / Tic Tac — the case that broke the modern silence.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>The Nimitz Carrier Strike Group has been picking up unidentified objects on AN/SPY-1 radar for two weeks. On 14 November, Commander David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight launch an F/A-18F intercept. They find a Tic Tac-shaped white object hovering over the ocean. As Fravor dives toward it, the object mirrors his maneuvers, then accelerates impossibly fast and disappears. Minutes later it reappears at the CAP point — sixty miles away — at a closing speed Fravor calls "well beyond anything we had then or have now."</p>
    <p>Lt. Cmdr. Chad Underwood captures the FLIR1 video on a follow-up sortie. The case sits classified for thirteen years. In December 2017, the New York Times publishes the video alongside Leslie Kean's reporting. The modern UAP era begins.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>Specific Nimitz/Tic Tac material lives in earlier ODNI / AOIMSG releases and the December 2017 NYT publication. The May 2026 war.gov drop is not the Tic Tac drop.</blockquote><cite>Cross-reference note · this archive</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>Nimitz is the post-2017 anchor case. Multiple aircrew witnesses, AEGIS radar lock, FLIR video, a kinematic profile no platform of the era could match, and a thirteen-year delay between the encounter and its public emergence. The pattern of "credible internal acknowledgment, decades of public denial" is the entire 1947 → 2004 record condensed into one event.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>Pentagon (2017+): the FLIR1 video is authentic. The encounter is real. The objects remain unidentified. AARO (2022+) classifies similar encounters as "unresolved" pending further analysis. No Tic Tac-specific case file has been released to the public domain by AARO.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>Not Nimitz itself. <strong>What the May 2026 drop adds is the modern operational successor</strong>: 49 PR-series "Unresolved UAP Reports" and ~80 D-series mission reports, mostly 2020–2026, all routed through AARO. Tic Tac was the case that justified the pipeline. This drop is the pipeline's first public output.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>(External · ODNI 2021/2022)</strong></span><a href="./text/dow-uap-d61-mission-report-persian-gulf-august-2020.txt">Open the closest in-corpus equivalent</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-centcom">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 19</span><span class="date">August 2020 / October 2020</span><span class="place">Persian Gulf / Strait of Hormuz · USCENTCOM</span><span class="badge" data-s="modern">Modern</span></div>
  <h3>USCENTCOM — UAP observations inside routine SIGINT/IMINT collection.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>Two CENTCOM mission reports declassified by Major General Richard A. Harrison and approved for release to AARO. The first, MISREP 4685903 from August 2020, is a 21-mission-hour ISR sortie supporting NAVCENT operations across the Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman. Buried inside it: <em>"AT 1527Z, OBSERVED 1X UNK FORMATION."</em> Reported via standard tasking channels, with imagery exploited by DGS-1.</p>
    <p>The second, MISREP 4871281 from October 2020, is similar — a 21-hour sortie, multiple guard calls, and one observation: <em>"OBSERVED 1X UAP, SEE OBSERVATION LINE I."</em> Both were declassified and routed for AARO release within months of public availability. The internal-to-public gap is no longer measured in decades.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>USCENTCOM MDR 26-0028 — Approved for Release to AARO — FOUO/PA applies 03/16/26.</blockquote><cite>USCENTCOM Mission Report · Strait of Hormuz · Oct 2020</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>The fact that UAP observations now flow through ordinary SIGINT/IMINT pipelines, rather than separate UFO tracks, is the single most important institutional change since Project Blue Book ended in 1969. Whatever this is, the Department of War now treats it as part of normal collection.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>AARO (2022+): the routing of UAP encounters through standard reporting channels is intentional. It allows analysis without separate stovepipes. The "Unresolved" classification on PR-series reports means the analysis is incomplete, not necessarily that the encounter is anomalous.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p><strong>The actual mission reports.</strong> Not summaries, not analysis — the underlying MISREPs, with mission hours, sensor types, AOC routing, and the operative observation line. This is the first time the public has seen what a UAP entry inside a CENTCOM ISR mission looks like in the original document.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>DOW-UAP-D63 · Strait of Hormuz · L 13, 38</strong></span><a href="./text/dow-uap-d63-mission-report-strait-of-hormuz-october-2020.txt">Open the file</a></div>
</section>

<section class="case" id="case-pr-series">
  <div class="meta"><span class="ix">№ 20</span><span class="date">2020 – 2026</span><span class="place">Worldwide · DOW PR-series</span><span class="badge" data-s="modern">Modern</span></div>
  <h3>The 49 Unresolved UAP Reports.</h3>
  <div class="narr">
    <p>The single largest operational UAP catalog ever publicly released. PR1 (Middle East, May 2022) through PR49 (Department of the Army, 2026). Geographic distribution: Greece, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Syria, Djibouti, "Africa 2025," INDOPACOM 2023–2024. Each case has a paired DVIDS video — most are FLIR/IR, some are color, a few are multi-sensor.</p>
    <p>The cases share a vocabulary: silent, often spherical, sometimes triangular or oblong, observed by AF aircrews and INDOPACOM units, generally in operational theaters where US assets are routinely deployed. None are concluded. All are tagged "Unresolved." All are routed through AARO.</p>
  </div>
  <div class="pull"><blockquote>PR1 (Middle East 2022) → PR49 (Department of the Army 2026). 28 paired DVIDS videos. Geographic distribution: CENTCOM, INDOPACOM, EUCOM, AFRICOM. All "Approved for Release to AARO" in late 2025 / early 2026.</blockquote><cite>Cross-reference note · this archive</cite></div>
  <div class="faceoff">
    <div class="claim"><h4>What ufologists say</h4><p>This is the disclosure pattern people have been predicting since Tic Tac became public: a sustained, geographically diverse, multi-platform stream of officially unresolved cases coming through a single institutional pipe. Whatever the final explanation, the volume forces the question.</p></div>
    <div class="official"><h4>The official line</h4><p>AARO: these are unresolved encounters in operational theaters. Some will likely be resolved as foreign drones, conventional aircraft, or natural phenomena. Some will likely remain unresolved. The release pipeline is intentional and ongoing.</p></div>
  </div>
  <div class="resolution"><h4>What the war.gov release adds</h4><p>This <em>is</em> what the war.gov release adds. <strong>The 49 PR-series files and the ~80 supporting D-series mission reports are the largest single-event UAP document drop in US history</strong>, routed through AARO and explicitly framed as the first of N. Drop 2 will tell you whether this is a steady-state pipeline or a one-time political moment.</p></div>
  <div class="source"><span class="src"><strong>./videos/ + ./pdfs/ — PR-series &amp; D-series</strong></span><a href="#">See the full audit</a></div>
</section>

<section class="gallery" id="gallery">
  <div class="gallery-head">
    <div class="num">§ VI</div>
    <h2>The video archive.</h2>
    <p class="deck">All <strong id="g-count">28</strong> videos that shipped alongside the PDFs in the May 2026 drop. Each one is a paired DVIDS asset for a specific case in the catalog — most are FLIR or other infrared sensor footage from US military platforms; one is a Gemini 7 audio excerpt from 1965. Each card shows AARO's own description of what's in the clip. <strong>Streamed direct from the DVIDS public CDN</strong> — nothing self-hosted, nothing republished.</p>
  </div>

  <div class="gallery-toolbar">
    <div class="filters" role="tablist" aria-label="Filter video archive">
      <button data-filter="all" aria-pressed="true">All</button>
      <button data-filter="centcom" aria-pressed="false">CENTCOM</button>
      <button data-filter="indopacom" aria-pressed="false">INDOPACOM</button>
      <button data-filter="army" aria-pressed="false">DoA</button>
      <button data-filter="nasa" aria-pressed="false">NASA</button>
    </div>
    <div class="total"><span id="g-shown">28</span>/<strong id="g-total">28</strong> videos</div>
  </div>

  <div class="gallery-grid" id="gallery-grid"></div>
</section>

<section class="gallery" id="imagery">
  <div class="gallery-head">
    <div class="num">§ VII</div>
    <h2>The image archive.</h2>
    <p class="deck">All <strong id="img-count">14</strong> stills released alongside the videos. Eight FBI plates from a still-image submission to AARO (date and location not released); five archival NASA Apollo 12 photographs (1969) with highlighted "areas of interest"; one Apollo 17 lunar-sky photograph (December 1972) that the Department of War has formally opened a case to investigate. Click any image to open it full-size.</p>
  </div>

  <div class="gallery-toolbar">
    <div class="filters" role="tablist" aria-label="Filter image archive">
      <button data-img-filter="all" aria-pressed="true">All</button>
      <button data-img-filter="fbi" aria-pressed="false">FBI</button>
      <button data-img-filter="nasa" aria-pressed="false">NASA</button>
    </div>
    <div class="total"><span id="img-shown">14</span>/<strong id="img-total">14</strong> images</div>
  </div>

  <div class="image-grid" id="image-grid"></div>
</section>

<section class="threads" id="threads">
  <h2>Threads that run through the cases.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Five recurring patterns the corpus surfaces — each one is more interesting than any single case in isolation.</p>

  <div class="thread-grid">
    <div class="thread">
      <h4>Nuclear adjacency</h4>
      <p>Roswell (1947) sits next to the only nuclear-armed bomber base in the world. Kirtland (1949) tracks 100 sightings over the AEC / AFSWP corridor. Kapustin Yar (1989) is a Soviet missile-base illumination. AARO's modern PR-series clusters in operational theaters where the US deploys nuclear-capable platforms.</p>
      <div class="links"><a href="#case-roswell">№ 03</a><a href="#case-kirtland">№ 07</a><a href="#case-pr-series">№ 20</a></div>
    </div>
    <div class="thread">
      <h4>Electromagnetic interference</h4>
      <p>RB-47 (1957) — ECM tracks an object outside ground-radar range. Tehran (1976) — two F-4s lose all comms at exactly 45 km, three times. Bariloche (1995) — town and airport lights fail. The EM cutoff is the single most temporally stable effect in the corpus.</p>
      <div class="links"><a href="#case-rb47">№ 10</a><a href="#case-tehran">№ 15</a></div>
    </div>
    <div class="thread">
      <h4>Physical traces (France only)</h4>
      <p>Valensole (1965), Cussac (1967), Trans-en-Provence (1981), Amaranth (1982). Four cases, all France, all investigated by gendarmerie + GEPAN. The phenomenon is documented to leave ground impressions, multi-year directional plant kill, and a chlorophyll-amino-acid trauma signature attributed to a microwave field.</p>
      <div class="links"><a href="#case-valensole">№ 11</a><a href="#case-cussac">№ 12</a><a href="#case-trans">№ 13</a></div>
    </div>
    <div class="thread">
      <h4>The internal-to-public gap</h4>
      <p>Twining 1947 → first public USAF acknowledgment ~74 years later. Kirtland 1949 → still no public USAF statement. DIA Tehran 1976 → ODNI 2021 closest alignment, ~45 years. Modern AARO releases: gap measured in <em>months</em>. The pattern flips abruptly between 2020 and 2025.</p>
      <div class="links"><a href="#case-twining">№ 02</a><a href="#case-kirtland">№ 07</a><a href="#case-tehran">№ 15</a><a href="#case-centcom">№ 19</a></div>
    </div>
    <div class="thread">
      <h4>The disinformation thesis</h4>
      <p>COMETA explicitly classifies the 1994 USAF Mogul report as "reducing disinformation" and the 1995 alien-autopsy film as "amplifying disinformation" — a poison pill to discredit Roswell during the GAO inquiry. Hynek himself confessed to "trivializing numerous cases" by inventing astronomical explanations. The whole machinery is named, in the corpus.</p>
      <div class="links"><a href="#case-roswell">№ 03</a><a href="#case-mogul">№ 05</a></div>
    </div>
  </div>

  <a class="appendix-link" href="#researchers">See who actually wrote this canon — 15 researchers</a>
</section>

<section class="threads" id="researchers">
  <h2>Who actually wrote this canon.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Filled dot = named in this corpus. Outline dot = referenced only externally. Velasco is one of fifteen; the audit deliberately does not center him.</p>
  <div class="researchers-grid">
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Kenneth Arnold</p>
      <p class="role">Witness · 24 Jun 1947</p>
      <p class="desc">Civilian pilot. The Mt. Rainier sighting that started the modern era. Interviewed by AAF investigators on the same week as the Twining FBI memo.</p>
      <p class="corpus">FBI 62-HQ-83894 § 3</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Maj. Jesse Marcel</p>
      <p class="role">Witness · 1947 · USAF</p>
      <p class="desc">509th Bomb Group intelligence officer. Recovered Roswell debris. 1978 TV testimony reopens the case.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA App. 5</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Gen. Roger Ramey</p>
      <p class="role">Officer · 1947 · 8th AF</p>
      <p class="desc">8th Air Force commander, Fort Worth. Orchestrated the weather-balloon press substitution. DuBose's 1991 affidavit confirms.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA App. 5 · 5 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Gen. Nathan F. Twining</p>
      <p class="role">Officer · 1947 · AAF MC</p>
      <p class="desc">Commander of AAF Materiel Command. The 23 Sept 1947 memo + the FBI's 19 Aug capture of his "wash out" posture.</p>
      <p class="corpus">FBI § 3 · COMETA · 46 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>J. Allen Hynek</p>
      <p class="role">Astronomer · USAF consultant 1948–66</p>
      <p class="desc">From Project Sign through Blue Book. Coined "close encounter" classifications. Late in life publicly admitted helping trivialize cases.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA · 5 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Philip J. Klass</p>
      <p class="role">Skeptic · Aviation Week</p>
      <p class="desc">Most prominent Anglophone debunker, 1960s–90s. COMETA explicitly calls his Tehran rebuttal "hardly convincing."</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA · several</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Lt. Col. Philip J. Corso</p>
      <p class="role">Army R&amp;D · 1961–63</p>
      <p class="desc">Chief of Foreign Technology, Army R&amp;D. <em>The Day After Roswell</em> (1997). Foreword by Sen. Thurmond, later retracted.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA 9.1 · 8 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Jacques Vallée</p>
      <p class="role">Computer scientist · GEPAN</p>
      <p class="desc">French-American astronomer, ex-GEPAN. Long-form physical-trace and mythology approach. Cited bibliographically in COMETA &amp; FBI § 1.</p>
      <p class="corpus">2 files · 3 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Jean-Jacques Velasco</p>
      <p class="role">Director · SEPRA / GEIPAN 1983–04</p>
      <p class="desc">French CNES. Trans-en-Provence is his canonical case. The COMETA report draws on his methodology directly.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA throughout</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Nick Pope</p>
      <p class="role">UK MoD · UFO desk 1991–94</p>
      <p class="desc">Ran the British MoD's UFO desk (Sec(AS)2a). Public-facing in the 90s. Quoted in COMETA Ch. 9.2.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA · 5 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Leslie Kean</p>
      <p class="role">Journalist · NYT 2017</p>
      <p class="desc">Co-author of the December 2017 NYT piece that re-launched the modern UAP discussion. Earlier 2010 book references Mainbrace, Tehran, Bariloche.</p>
      <p class="corpus">COMETA · 4 hits</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="yes"></span>Stanton Friedman</p>
      <p class="role">Nuclear physicist · researcher</p>
      <p class="desc">Brought Marcel back into public view (1978). Long-form Roswell investigator. Cited in canonical Roswell historiography.</p>
      <p class="corpus">External</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="no"></span>Robert Hastings</p>
      <p class="role">Researcher · UFOs &amp; Nukes</p>
      <p class="desc">Compiled hundreds of nuclear-base UFO incidents from USAF retirees. The Kirtland 1949 cable is direct primary support for Hastings's thesis.</p>
      <p class="corpus">External</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="no"></span>Lue Elizondo</p>
      <p class="role">Former AATIP · DoD</p>
      <p class="desc">2017 NYT disclosure of AATIP's existence. Frequently cited in modern UAP discourse. No corpus mention.</p>
      <p class="corpus">External</p>
    </div>
    <div class="rcard">
      <p class="name"><span class="dot" data-in="no"></span>David Grusch</p>
      <p class="role">Former NRO/NGA · Whistleblower 2023</p>
      <p class="desc">26 Jul 2023 sworn testimony to House Oversight. Multi-decade NHI program claims. Entirely external to this drop.</p>
      <p class="corpus">External</p>
    </div>
  </div>
</section>

<section class="threads" id="gaps">
  <h2>Cases that are <em>not</em> in this drop.</h2>
  <p class="deck">Absence here means "not documented in this release," not "doesn't exist." Each gap is sourceable elsewhere; routes listed below.</p>
  <ul class="gap-list">
    <li><span class="name">Project Sign / Grudge</span><span class="where">National Archives RG-341</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Project Blue Book primary docs</span><span class="where">Project Blue Book online release</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Battelle Special Report 14 (1955)</span><span class="where">NICAP · DTIC</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Robertson Panel report (1953)</span><span class="where">CIA FOIA reading room</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Condon Report (1969)</span><span class="where">University of Colorado</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Halt memo · Rendlesham (1980)</span><span class="where">UK MoD release · N. Pope</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">MJ-12 documents</span><span class="where">Treat as unverified · COMETA does not endorse</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">AATIP / AAWSAP DIRDs</span><span class="where">KLAS Las Vegas</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Skinwalker Ranch reports</span><span class="where">Bigelow / KLAS</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">2023 Grusch testimony</span><span class="where">House Oversight transcript</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Nimitz 2004 specifics</span><span class="where">ODNI 2021/2022 · AOIMSG predecessor</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Belgian Wave SOBEPS materials</span><span class="where">Belgian SOBEPS archive</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">JAL 1628 FAA tape</span><span class="where">Callahan archive · FAA</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Westall (1966, AU)</span><span class="where">Australian RAAF / external</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Ariel School (1994, ZW)</span><span class="where">External · J. Mack archive</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Phoenix Lights (1997)</span><span class="where">FBI Vault Serial 449 ref. only</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Walton / Pascagoula / Hill</span><span class="where">External (abduction record)</span></li>
    <li><span class="name">Coyne helicopter (1973)</span><span class="where">External · APRO files</span></li>
  </ul>
</section>

</article>
</main>

<div class="lightbox" id="lightbox" role="dialog" aria-modal="true" aria-label="Image viewer">
  <button class="close" id="lb-close" type="button">Close ✕</button>
  <img id="lb-image" alt="">
  <div class="lb-meta" id="lb-meta"></div>
</div>

<footer>
  <div class="wide">
    <div class="row">
      <div>
        <div style="font-family:var(--serif);font-weight:500;font-size:1.1rem;color:var(--ink);margin-bottom:6px;">War.gov / UFO · Drop 1</div>
        <p style="margin:0;max-width:56ch;">A reading of the May 2026 release as twenty case stories. Every quote has a citation; every claim has a verdict. Pipeline scripts at the repo root regenerate the corpus and the inlined media data when drop 2 lands.</p>
      </div>
      <div>
        <div style="font-family:var(--mono);font-size:0.66rem;letter-spacing:0.14em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted);margin-bottom:0.5rem;">REPO</div>
        <div style="display:flex;gap:0.6rem 1.2rem;flex-wrap:wrap;">
          <a href="https://github.com/jmdlab/warorgufo">GitHub</a>
          <a href="./HIGHLIGHTS.md">Highlights.md</a>
          <a href="./CROSS_REFERENCE.md">Cross-reference.md</a>
          <a href="./media.json">media.json</a>
          <a href="./manifest.json">manifest.json</a>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>

<script id="media-data" type="application/json">{"generated": "from manifest.json", "videos": [{"title": "NASA-UAP-D3A, Gemini 7 Audio Excerpt, 1965", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Low Earth Orbit", "incident_date": "12/5/65", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "", "description": "This audio recording contains air to ground communications and the NASA Public Affairs audio feed with commentary, recorded during the flight of the Gemini 7 mission. In this excerpted segment of audio, Astronaut Frank Borman reports to NASA mission control in Houston his sighting of an unidentified object, which he referred to as a \"bogey.\" This sighting occurred on December 5, 1965. The dialogue includes Borman's initial report, as well as additional comments by Astronaut Jim Lovell, Borman's fellow crew member.", "dvids_id": "1006119", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006119", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006119", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689232/DOD_111689232.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006119/DOD_111689232.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR19, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2022", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Middle East", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2022", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D10, described the observation as a “possible missile” moving across the field-of-view. The report also described four other objects not depicted in the video as “possible birds.”\n\nVideo Description: At the two second mark, the video depicts an area of contrast moving from left to right across the bottom third of the sensor field-of-view.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006056", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006056", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006056", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688723/DOD_111688723.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006056/DOD_111688723.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR21, Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, May 2022", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Iraq", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, May 2022", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D14, described the UAP as a “probable SU-27/35.\" \n\nVideo Description: The video depicts two areas of contrast moving together near the center of the field-of-view throughout the runtime.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.\n\nAARO Comment: SU-27 and SU-35 are designations for military aircraft operated by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.", "dvids_id": "1006059", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006059", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006059", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688762/DOD_111688762.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006059/DOD_111688762.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR22, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, July 2022", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Syria", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, July 2022", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 14 seconds of video footage from an infrared (left) and electro-optical (right) sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D16, described the UAP as “moving from north to south.”\n\nVideo Description: At the five second mark, the video depicts an object moving from right to left across the top right quarter of the sensor field-of-view.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006060", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006060", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006060", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688775/DOD_111688775.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006060/DOD_111688775.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR23, Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, December 2022", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Iraq", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, December 2022", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D18, described the UAP as \"flying west to east.\"\n\nVideo Description: The video depicts an area of contrast moving from the bottom left to the top right of the sensor field-of-view. At approximately six seconds, the area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view near the top right corner of the frame.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006062", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006062", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006062", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688809/DOD_111688809.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006062/DOD_111688809.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR26, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "United Arab Emirates", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 43 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D23, mentions a UAP was observed during the mission.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:17: An area of contrast remains generally within the top left quarter of the display.\n00:17-00:18: The sensor pans from right to left, causing the area of contrast to pass through the center of the display. The sensor then pans from left to right, causing the area of contrast to return to its approximate initial position within the sensor field-of-view.\n00:29: The sensor stops tracking the area of contrast, causing it to leave the sensor field-of-view on the left side of the screen.\n00:30-00:43: The sensor resumes its motion relative to the background but does not reacquire the area of contrast.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006063", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006063", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006063", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688816/DOD_111688816.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006063/DOD_111688816.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR27, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "United Arab Emirates", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of four minutes and 57 seconds of video footage from an infrared (IR) sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D23, mentions a UAP was observed during the mission.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-01:55: No content.\n01:56: An area of contrast becomes distinguishable against the background in the center of the right side of the display.\n02:04: The IR sensor pans to center on the area of contrast.\n02:14: The sensor field-of-view narrows to zoom in on the area of contrast.\n02:15-03:26: The area of contrast remains generally in the center of the sensor field-of-view. \n03:27-04:57: The sensor motion causes the area of contrast to move erratically across the display. Due to this motion, the sensor system repeatedly loses and reacquires the area of contrast within the center area of the display.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006067", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006067", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006067", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688825/DOD_111688825.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006067/DOD_111688825.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR28, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, January 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Greece", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, January 2024", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and five seconds of video footage captured via multiple sensor modalities aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D7, described the UAP as “diamond-shaped” and moving at approximately 434 knots. The observer also reported that the UAP was only detectable via short-wave infrared (SWIR) sensor.\n\nVideo Description: The screen is split into two viewing areas for the first ten seconds of the video, with the right side displaying electro-optical footage and the left side displaying SWIR footage.\n00:04: An area of contrast becomes distinguishable against the background in the center of the right frame.\n00:10: The display shifts to a full-screen view of the SWIR feed to better focus on the area of contrast.\n00:55: The area of contrast remains generally within the center of the sensor field-of-view. The area of contrast visually resembles an inverted teardrop with a vertically linear trailing mass suspended below.\n00:56: The operator switches the sensor modality to visible spectrum, losing the subject against the background.\n00:57-01:05: The operator switches the sensor modality to SWIR (Black-Hot) but does not reacquire the area of contrast.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006073", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006073", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006073", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688954/DOD_111688954.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006073/DOD_111688954.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR29, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, June 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Gulf of Oman", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Gulf of Oman, June 2024", "description": "The United States Northern Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 21 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D8, described the UAP as consisting of an object with a vertical pole or bar attached to the bottom of the object. The observer also reported that the UAP may instead be a reflection from an object in the water.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:21: An area of contrast visually resembling an inverted teardrop with a vertically linear trailing mass suspended below remains generally within the center of the sensor field-of-view throughout the video.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006074", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006074", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006074", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688964/DOD_111688964.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006074/DOD_111688964.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR31, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Syria", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:01: An indistinctly shaped multi-colored area moves from right to left across the top edge of the sensor display within the first second of the video.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006076", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006076", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006076", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688970/DOD_111688970.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006076/DOD_111688970.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR32, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Syria", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of six seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:02-00:04: An area of irregular color and brightness, mainly consisting of white and red highlights, appears near the center of the top edge of the sensor display. The area extends to a width of approximately one-third of the horizontal frame, with a vertical area comprising approximately one-sixth of the viewing area. Overall, its shape is best described as a horizontally-oriented half-oval bisected along its major axis.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006078", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006078", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006078", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111688997/DOD_111688997.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006078/DOD_111688997.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR33, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Syria", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:01-00:03: Two semi-transparent, irregularly shaped orange areas overlay the background imagery, persisting for less than two seconds each.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006079", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006079", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006079", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689005/DOD_111689005.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006079/DOD_111689005.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR34, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Greece", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two minutes and 57 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D33, described the UAP as flying near the surface of the ocean and making multiple “90-degree turns” at approximately 80 miles per hour.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:04: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left quarter of the screen.\n00:07-00:19: The area of contrast moves back and forth horizontally across the field-of-view as the sensor pans to track it.\n00:20-01:00: The area of contrast remains generally centered within the sensor field-of-view.\n01:00-02:01: The sensor designates the area of contrast with a blue reticle, synchronizing its motion with the area of contrast’s relative position.\n02:02-02:21: The sensor engages a contrast filter to better differentiate the area of contrast from the background.\n02:22: The area of contrast becomes indistinguishable against the background, and the reticle drops its lock.\n02:27-02:57: After losing lock, the sensor rapidly cycles zoom levels and contrast thresholds.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006080", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006080", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006080", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689011/DOD_111689011.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006080/DOD_111689011.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR35, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Greece", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 24 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D35, described the UAP as small and circular, flying near the surface of the ocean toward land.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:02: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on an area of contrast near the center of the screen.\n00:03-00:19: The sensor tracks the area of contrast as it moves against the ocean background.\n00:20: As the background scene transitions from being predominantly water to land, the area of contrast becomes indistinguishable.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006082", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006082", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006082", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689022/DOD_111689022.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006082/DOD_111689022.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR36, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Middle East", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two minutes and 17 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. An accompanying Range Fouler report, DoW-UAP-D38, described the UAP as a solid white object making erratic movements above the water.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:05: An area of contrast briefly enters the sensor field-of-view from the left side of the screen.\n00:06-00:18: The sensor pans away from the scene’s initial subject matter while cycling contrast settings and zoom levels.\n00:19: The area of contrast re-enters the sensor field-of-view from near the center of the top edge of the screen.\n00:20-01:15: The area of contrast remains generally within the sensor field-of-view.\n01:16: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.\n01:56: The sensor further narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.\n02:10: A blue reticle briefly appears on screen but does not acquire a lock on the area of contrast.\n02:15-02:17: The sensor switches to a different modality and loses track of the area of contrast.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006083", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006083", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006083", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689030/DOD_111689030.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006083/DOD_111689030.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR37, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Arabian Gulf", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of nine seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:06-00:08: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left quarter of the screen, follows a generally linear path from the bottom of the screen to the top, and exits from the top left quarter.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006087", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006087", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006087", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689044/DOD_111689044.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006087/DOD_111689044.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR38, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2013", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Middle East", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Resolved as an Aircraft, Middle East 2013", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 46 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2013. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description: This video depicts an area of contrast resembling an eight-pointed star with arms of alternating length.\n00:10: The sensor field-of-view narrows to zoom in on the area of contrast.\n00:11-00:29: The area of contrast moves within the sensor field-of-view, followed by a visible trail.\n00:30: The area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view at the bottom right of the screen.\n00:35-01:44: Following an apparent cut, the area of contrast generally remains within the sensor field-of-view before exiting the frame from the top left quarter of the screen.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006088", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006088", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006088", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689051/DOD_111689051.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006088/DOD_111689051.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR39, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Arabian Gulf", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:03-00:05: A faint area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom half of the right edge of the screen, proceeds from right to left across the corner of the frame, and exits the scene from near the center of the bottom edge of the screen.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006089", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006089", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006089", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689057/DOD_111689057.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006089/DOD_111689057.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR40, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Arabian Gulf", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and three seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The original reporter digitally altered the imagery by pausing the video playback and adding a white line encircling an area of interest at timestamp 00:10, annotated with the phrase “U/I SMALL THERMAL SIGNATURE.” AARO did not edit the originally reported material, and this media is presented as received.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:09: An area of contrast brightens within the sensor field-of-view, becoming increasingly distinct against the background.\n00:10-00:14: Playback pauses to display a white line encircling an area of interest, annotated with the phrase “U/I SMALL THERMAL SIGNATURE.”\n00:15-01:03: Playback resumes, with the sensor panning to track the area of contrast against the background, generally maintaining the area of contrast’s position within the top third of the display area. During this period, the sensor cycles through several contrast and zoom settings.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006093", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006093", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006093", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689082/DOD_111689082.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006093/DOD_111689082.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR41, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Arabian Gulf", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 34 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:01: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom third of the left side of the screen.\n00:02-01:34: The sensor pans from left to right, tracking the area of contrast and keeping it generally centered within the field-of-view.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006094", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006094", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006094", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689083/DOD_111689083.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006094/DOD_111689083.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR42, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Arabian Gulf", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of four minutes and 53 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:12: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left corner of the frame. The sensor pans to track the area of contrast, keeping it generally within the lower left quadrant of the frame.\n00:13-00:40: The area of contrast intermittently loses distinctiveness against the background, seeming to disappear and reappear irregularly.\n00:41: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.\n00:42-00:52: An area of contrast exits the sensor field-of-view from the left half of the top of the frame, after which the sensor pans up and to the left.\n00:53-02:09: The sensor pans erratically, with an area of contrast appearing in a relatively fixed position to the left and slightly below the center of the frame.\n02:09-02:29: The sensor switches imaging modalities, and the area of contrast appears to the right and slightly above the center of the frame.\n02:30-04:53: The sensor switches imaging modalities again, and the area of contrast returns to its previous position to the left and slightly below the center of the frame.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006097", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006097", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006097", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689090/DOD_111689090.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006097/DOD_111689090.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR43, Unresolved UAP Report, Africa, 2025", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Djibouti", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Djibouti, 2025", "description": "The United States Africa Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2025. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:02: A small, barely distinguishable area of contrast moves from the left side of the sensor field-of-view to the right side, exiting the scene from the bottom right quarter of the screen.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance. The video is looped for viewing purposes.", "dvids_id": "1006159", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006159", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006159", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689759/DOD_111689759.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006159/DOD_111689759.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR44, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Arabian Gulf", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020", "description": "The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five minutes and 11 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description: This video features incidentally recorded audio, which does not relate to the visual content described below.\n00:00-00:30: No content.\n00:31-03:24: The sensor pans down and to the right to focus on an area of contrast. The sensor tracks the area of contrast against the background for approximately three minutes, panning to maintain its position generally within the center of the frame. The sensor cycles contrast and zoom levels several times throughout, appearing as brief, bright white flashes across the frame.\n03:25-04:23: The sensor cycles through reticles of various sizes while continuing to track the area of contrast. Between 04:20 and 04:23, the area of contrast briefly leaves the center of the sensor field-of-view.\n04:24-04:50: The sensor field-of-view widens to zoom out from the scene, continuing to track the area of contrast.\n04:50-04:54: The sensor stops tracking the area of contrast, at which point it exits the frame from the top left quadrant of the screen.\n04:55-05:11: No content.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006104", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006104", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006104", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689115/DOD_111689115.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006104/DOD_111689115.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR45, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Southern United States", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Southern United States, 2020", "description": "The Department of the Air Force submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 58 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:03: The sensor tracks an area of contrast acquiring a reticle lock.\n00:04-00:30: The area of contrast gradually increases in distinctiveness against the background.\n00:31: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.\n00:32-00:56: The area of contrast increases in apparent size and distinctiveness.\n00:57-00:58: The area of contrast leaves the center of the frame and passes out of the sensor field-of-view, exiting the scene in the bottom right corner of the screen.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.\n\nAARO Comment: The area of contrast’s apparent increase in size is likely to be at least partially attributable to the U.S. platform closing the distance between itself and the source of the detection.", "dvids_id": "1006105", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006105", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006105", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689123/DOD_111689123.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006105/DOD_111689123.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR46, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "East China Sea", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report East China Sea, 2024", "description": "The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of nine seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:09: The sensor focuses on an area of contrast that resembles a football-shaped body with three radial projections: one oriented vertically, and two oriented downward at a 45-degree angle relative to the major axis of the main mass.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006106", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006106", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006106", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689133/DOD_111689133.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006106/DOD_111689133.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR47, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2023", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Japan", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report Japan, 2023", "description": "The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 59 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-01:59: The sensor tracks three distinct areas of contrast, maintaining their positions generally within the center of the frame. The areas of contrast appear to maintain a fixed position and orientation relative to one another.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006107", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006107", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006107", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689142/DOD_111689142.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006107/DOD_111689142.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR48, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2024", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "Indo-PACOM", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Indo-PACOM 2024", "description": "The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 39 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-01:39: The sensor tracks an area of contrast, maintaining its position generally within the center of the frame.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006110", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006110", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006110", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689167/DOD_111689167.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006110/DOD_111689167.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}, {"title": "DOW-UAP-PR49, Unresolved UAP Report, Department of the Army, 2026", "agency": "Department of War", "incident_location": "North America", "incident_date": "N/A", "release_date": "5/8/26", "video_title": "Unresolved UAP Report, Department of the Army 2026", "description": "The Department of the Army submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 49 seconds of video from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2026. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.\n\nVideo Description:\n00:00-00:08: The sensor tracks an initial area of interest.\n00:09-00:16: The sensor disengages from its previous area of focus and pans from right to left to track two areas of contrast, narrowing the field-of-view to zoom in while panning to maintain the objects' positions generally within the center of the frame.\n00:17-01:03: The sensor widens its field-of-view to zoom out, keeping the areas of contrast generally centered within the display.\n01:04-01:08: The sensor field-of-view rapidly cycles between levels of zoom, causing the areas of contrast to appear to rapidly increase and decrease in size.\n01:09-01:48: The sensor tracks the areas of contrast while maintaining a generally centered position, intermittently cycling between contrast settings.\n\nThis video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "dvids_id": "1006111", "dvids_page": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006111", "dvids_embed": "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/1006111", "mp4_url": "https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689168/DOD_111689168.mp4", "thumbnail_url": "https://d1ldvf68ux039x.cloudfront.net/thumbs/frames/video/2605/1006111/DOD_111689168.0000001/1000w_q95.jpg"}], "images": [{"title": "FBI Photo A1", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a uniform, grainy texture with a central crosshair reticle. A small, dark, and slightly irregular object is visible just below and to the right of the center of the reticle. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a1.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a1.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a1.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A2", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a mottled background with a central crosshair reticle. A dark, circular object is located at the center of the reticle. The background has a textured, uneven appearance suggesting a varied landscape or surface. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a2.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a2.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a2.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A3", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a mottled background with a central crosshair reticle. A dark, circular object is positioned exactly at the center of the reticle. The background shows a textured pattern, possibly depicting ground terrain. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a3.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a3.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a3.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A4", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a mottled background with a central crosshair reticle. A dark, circular object is visible just below and to the right of the center of the reticle. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a4.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a4.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a4.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A5", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a background with a dense, speckled pattern and a central crosshair reticle. A dark, circular object is located at the bottom quadrant and right of center of the reticle. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a5.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a5.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a5.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A6", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a lightly textured background with a central crosshair reticle. A dark, circular object is positioned at the center of the reticle. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a6.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a6.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a6.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A7", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a smooth, grainy background with a central crosshair reticle. A light-colored, circular object with a bright specular highlight is visible just below the center of the reticle. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a7.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a7.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a7.jpg"}, {"title": "FBI Photo A8", "agency": "FBI", "incident_location": "N/A", "incident_date": "Late 2025", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. government system. The date and location of the event have not been provided.  The original imagery was altered with redactions before being submitted to AARO. An accompanying mission report was not provided. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.\n\nNarrative Description: The monochrome image displays a background with faint, swirling patterns and a central crosshair reticle. A small, dark, irregular object is visible just below and to the right of the center of the reticle. This narrative description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/fbi-photo-a8.png", "local_path": "./images/fbi-photo-a8.png", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/fbi-photo-a8.jpg"}, {"title": "NASA-UAP-VM1, Apollo 12, 1969", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Moon", "incident_date": "1969", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "This archival photograph depicts the lunar surface as viewed from the landing site of Apollo 12. This image features a highlighted area of interest slightly to the right of the vertical axis of the frame, above the horizon, in which unidentified phenomena are visible. \n\nThis image has been modified from its original state to assist viewers in identifying specific areas of interest. These highlights are provided for contextual purposes only. Such alterations do not constitute an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the nature or significance of the subject matter.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm1-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "local_path": "./images/nasa-uap-vm1-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/nasa-uap-vm1-apollo-12-1969.jpg"}, {"title": "NASA-UAP-VM2, Apollo 12, 1969", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Moon", "incident_date": "1969", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "This archival photograph depicts the lunar surface as viewed from the landing site of Apollo 12. This image features two highlighted areas of interest, labeled “Area 1” and “Area 2,” slightly to the right of the vertical axis of the frame, above the horizon, in which unidentified phenomena are visible.\n\nThis image has been modified from its original state to assist viewers in identifying specific areas of interest. These highlights are provided for contextual purposes only. Such alterations do not constitute an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the nature or significance of the subject matter.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm2-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "local_path": "./images/nasa-uap-vm2-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/nasa-uap-vm2-apollo-12-1969.jpg"}, {"title": "NASA-UAP-VM3, Apollo 12, 1969", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Moon", "incident_date": "1969", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "This archival photograph depicts the lunar surface as viewed from the landing site of Apollo 12. This image features a highlighted area of interest near the right edge of the frame, above the horizon, in which unidentified phenomena are visible.\nThis image has been modified from its original state to assist viewers in identifying specific areas of interest. These highlights are provided for contextual purposes only. Such alterations do not constitute an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the nature or significance of the subject matter.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm3-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "local_path": "./images/nasa-uap-vm3-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/nasa-uap-vm3-apollo-12-1969.jpg"}, {"title": "NASA-UAP-VM4, Apollo 12, 1969", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Moon", "incident_date": "1969", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "This archival photograph depicts the lunar surface as viewed from the landing site of Apollo 12. This image features a highlighted area of interest slightly to the left of the vertical axis of the frame, above the horizon, in which unidentified phenomena are visible. \nThis image has been modified from its original state to assist viewers in identifying specific areas of interest. These highlights are provided for contextual purposes only. Such alterations do not constitute an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the nature or significance of the subject matter.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm4-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "local_path": "./images/nasa-uap-vm4-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/nasa-uap-vm4-apollo-12-1969.jpg"}, {"title": "NASA-UAP-VM5, Apollo 12, 1969", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Moon", "incident_date": "1969", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "This archival photograph depicts the lunar surface as viewed from the landing site of Apollo 12. This image features five highlighted areas of interest, labeled “Area 1” through “Area 5,” above the horizon, in which unidentified phenomena are visible.\nThis image has been modified from its original state to assist viewers in identifying specific areas of interest. These highlights are provided for contextual purposes only. Such alterations do not constitute an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the nature or significance of the subject matter.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm5-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "local_path": "./images/nasa-uap-vm5-apollo-12-1969.jpg", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/nasa-uap-vm5-apollo-12-1969.jpg"}, {"title": "NASA-UAP-VM6, Apollo 17, 1972", "agency": "NASA", "incident_location": "Moon", "incident_date": "1972", "release_date": "5/8/26", "description": "As part of the review of historical UAP materials under PURSUE, DOW has opened a case to investigate the accompanying NASA photograph from the Apollo 17 mission, taken December 1972. The image contains three “dots” in a triangular formation in the lower right quadrant of the lunar sky that is clearly visible upon magnification of the image. While this photo has been previously released and discussed by keen observers, there is no consensus about the nature of the anomaly. New preliminary US government analysis suggests the image feature is potentially the result of a physical object in the scene. Additionally, as part of this investigation, the government has obtained the original film from the Apollo 17 mission and the results of the full NASA and DOW analysis will be released when completed.", "wargov_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm6-apollo-17-1972.jpg", "local_path": "./images/nasa-uap-vm6-apollo-17-1972.jpg", "thumbnail_url": "https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/thumbnail/nasa-uap-vm6-apollo-17-1972.jpg"}]}</script>
<script>
(function () {
  const node = document.getElementById('media-data');
  if (!node) return;
  let data;
  try { data = JSON.parse(node.textContent); }
  catch (e) { console.warn('media-data parse failed', e); return; }
  const grid = document.getElementById('gallery-grid');
  const countEl = document.getElementById('g-count');
  const totalEl = document.getElementById('g-total');
  const shownEl = document.getElementById('g-shown');
  if (!grid || !data || !Array.isArray(data.videos)) return;

  // ── helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
  // pull the case ID (PR42 / VM6 / D3A / etc.) out of the title
  function extractId(title) {
    const m = (title || '').match(/(PR\d+|D\d+[A-Z]?|VM\d+)/i);
    return m ? m[1].toUpperCase() : '';
  }
  // strip the prefix DoD-style; leave the human-readable bit
  function cleanTitle(title) {
    return (title || '')
      .replace(/^(DOW-UAP-|NASA-UAP-)\s*[A-Z0-9]+\s*,\s*/i, '')
      .replace(/\s*,?\s*Unresolved UAP Report\s*,?\s*/i, '')
      .trim();
  }
  // pull the year out of the date (incident_date or fallback)
  function extractYear(v) {
    const fields = [v.incident_date, v.video_title, v.title];
    for (const f of fields) {
      const m = (f || '').match(/(?:^|[\s,/-])(19\d{2}|20\d{2})(?:[\s,/-]|$)/);
      if (m) return m[1];
    }
    return '';
  }
  // figure out the agency for filtering (more specific than the manifest's "Department of War")
  function classify(v) {
    const blob = ((v.description || '') + ' ' + (v.title || '') + ' ' + (v.incident_location || '')).toLowerCase();
    if (/nasa|gemini|apollo|skylab/.test(blob)) return 'nasa';
    if (/indo-?pacific|indopacom|indo-?pacom|east china sea|japan/.test(blob)) return 'indopacom';
    if (/africa command|africom|djibouti/.test(blob)) return 'centcom'; // group AFRICOM under CENTCOM tab to keep filters simple
    if (/department of the army|northern command|northcom/.test(blob)) return 'army';
    if (/central command|centcom|middle east|arabian gulf|hormuz|iraq|syria|emirates|yemen|persian gulf|gulf of oman/.test(blob)) return 'centcom';
    return 'other';
  }
  // chop the description so each card has roughly the same visual weight
  function shortDesc(desc) {
    if (!desc) return '';
    // strip the boilerplate opening if present
    return desc
      .replace(/^The (United States [^.]+|Department of [^.]+) submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (\(UAP\) )?to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office \(AARO\) /i,
               'AARO received ')
      .trim();
  }

  // ── sort: PR-series first by number, then NASA, then anything else ──
  const sortScore = (v) => {
    const t = v.title || '';
    const m = t.match(/PR(\d+)/i);
    if (m) return parseInt(m[1], 10);
    if (/NASA/i.test(t)) return 5000 + parseInt((t.match(/\d+/) || ['0'])[0], 10);
    return 9000;
  };
  const sorted = data.videos.slice().sort((a, b) => sortScore(a) - sortScore(b));

  if (countEl) countEl.textContent = sorted.length;
  if (totalEl) totalEl.textContent = sorted.length;
  if (shownEl) shownEl.textContent = sorted.length;

  // ── render every card ────────────────────────────────────────
  const frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
  sorted.forEach(v => {
    const id = extractId(v.title);
    const ttl = cleanTitle(v.title);
    const year = extractYear(v);
    const place = v.incident_location && v.incident_location !== 'N/A' ? v.incident_location : '';
    const agencyLabel = classify(v).toUpperCase();
    const filterTag = classify(v);
    const desc = shortDesc(v.description || '').replace(//g, '');

    const card = document.createElement('figure');
    card.className = 'video-card';
    card.dataset.dvids = v.dvids_id;
    card.dataset.filter = filterTag;
    card.innerHTML = `
      <div class="player" role="button" tabindex="0" aria-label="Play ${id || v.dvids_id}">
        <img loading="lazy" alt="" src="${v.thumbnail_url || ''}">
        <span class="play" aria-hidden="true"></span>
        <video preload="none" controls playsinline poster="${v.thumbnail_url || ''}" src="${v.mp4_url || ''}"></video>
      </div>
      <figcaption class="cap">
        <div class="head">
          <span class="id">${id || '—'}</span>
          <span class="agency">${agencyLabel}</span>
        </div>
        <p class="ttl">${ttl || 'Untitled'}</p>
        <div class="meta">
          ${place ? `<span class="place">${place}</span>` : ''}
          ${year ? `<span class="date">${year}</span>` : ''}
        </div>
        <p class="desc collapsed">${desc}</p>
        <button class="desc-toggle" type="button" aria-expanded="false">Read more</button>
        <div class="footer-row">
          <span>DVIDS ID ${v.dvids_id}</span>
          <a href="${v.dvids_page}" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View on DVIDS ↗</a>
        </div>
      </figcaption>
    `;

    // play behaviour
    const player = card.querySelector('.player');
    const video = card.querySelector('video');
    const start = () => {
      card.classList.add('playing');
      try { video.play(); } catch (e) { /* swallow autoplay errors */ }
    };
    player.addEventListener('click', (e) => {
      if (e.target.closest('a, video')) return;
      start();
    });
    player.addEventListener('keydown', (e) => {
      if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') { e.preventDefault(); start(); }
    });

    // description toggle
    const descEl = card.querySelector('.desc');
    const toggleEl = card.querySelector('.desc-toggle');
    // don't show toggle if description is short