Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how's the quality compar e with other audio tokenizer? #59

Open
MonolithFoundation opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

how's the quality compar e with other audio tokenizer? #59

MonolithFoundation opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@MonolithFoundation
Copy link

how's the quality compar e with other audio tokenizer?

@jishengpeng
Copy link
Owner

how's the quality compar e with other audio tokenizer?

Thank you for your attention. There are various dimensions to evaluating a codec; could you please clarify which specific baselines you are referring to?

@MonolithFoundation
Copy link
Author

thanks fot the reply. Specifically the human emotional style in generation

@jishengpeng
Copy link
Owner

thanks fot the reply. Specifically the human emotional style in generation

Thank you, I think acoustic codec is good about the human emotional style in generation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants