From d80351979bd0a173ff2bc8ab9f4af38dfbfe8b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jiri (George) Lebl" <jiri.lebl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:56:59 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] New version

---
 ca.tex | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ca.tex b/ca.tex
index ede6db5..aca15b4 100644
--- a/ca.tex
+++ b/ca.tex
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@
 Ji{\v r}\'i Lebl\\[3ex]} 
 \today
 \\
-(version 1.0)
+(version 1.1)
 \end{minipage}}
 
 %\addtolength{\textwidth}{\centeroffset}
@@ -21896,7 +21896,7 @@ \subsection{Differentiation under the integral}
 \end{thm}
 
 The hypotheses on $f$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ can be
-weakened to some degree, see e.g.\ \exerciseref{exercise:strongerleibniz}.
+weakened to a degree, see e.g.\ \exerciseref{exercise:strongerleibniz}.
 The proof below requires that
 $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ exists and is continuous
 as a function of two variables, and the $x$ interval must be the entire
@@ -23347,7 +23347,7 @@ \chapter{Basic Notation and Terminology} \label{ap:basicnotation}
 \lim_{t \downarrow a} f(t) \quad \Bigl( = \lim_{\substack{t \to a\\t > a}} f(t)
 \Bigr) ,
 \end{equation*}
-as these seemed clearer in some of the situations in this book.
+as these seemed the clearer option in some of the situations in this book.
 We may write $\{ x_n \}$ for a sequence $\{x_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ and similarly
 $\lim x_n$ instead of $\lim_{n\to \infty} x_n$ when it is clear that $n$ is
 the index of the sequence.