Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metadata -> Convert latitude / longitude to geojson #5

Open
halkeye opened this issue Mar 26, 2022 · 13 comments · May be fixed by #93
Open

Metadata -> Convert latitude / longitude to geojson #5

halkeye opened this issue Mar 26, 2022 · 13 comments · May be fixed by #93
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@halkeye
Copy link
Member

halkeye commented Mar 26, 2022

https://decapcms.org/docs/widgets/#map
https://www.gatsbyjs.com/plugins/gatsby-transformer-geojson/

@lemeurherve lemeurherve added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 15, 2022
@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

@halkeye Sir ,
the upper link is not working

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

@krisstern Hello Sir,may you please let me know if this issue i can work if it is still existing!

@krisstern
Copy link
Member

krisstern commented Dec 10, 2024

@biru-codeastromer We do not assign issues, but you can submit a PR for this issue if you understand the requirements.

@halkeye Sir , the upper link is not working

Also, I have updated the link now it should work.

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

sure Sir @krisstern Thanks very much for the update

@krisstern
Copy link
Member

Are you still working on this @biru-codeastromer? We do not want to see any contributor hoarding issues to work on

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

biru-codeastromer commented Jan 15, 2025

Hi Sir @krisstern,

I am still actively working on this issue. However, as per your earlier guidance, I was instructed to prioritize completing issue #1 before returning to this. I created a PR for issue #1, which you indicated was fine but required assistance from the infra team. Since the pr's are closely interrelated, I was waiting for that to be resolved.

Could you please confirm if I can proceed with this issue independently of #1, or if I should wait for the resolution of the previous issue first?

Looking forward to your confirmation.
Thanks!

Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 9 47 21 AM

@krisstern
Copy link
Member

I actually don't think you have a workable solution in #77, if you are working on #8 then I will close #77 so that anyone else interested can pick up on that issue.

@krisstern
Copy link
Member

You will need to choose one of #5 or #8 to work on at any one time, not both.

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Sir @krisstern,

Thank you for the clarification. I understand the need to focus on one issue at a time. Since I’ve been interested working on #8, I will prioritize completing it first. Once that’s done, I’ll return to #5 if it’s still open or available.

If you prefer, you can close #77, and I’ll ensure I wrap up my work on #8 efficiently before moving forward.

Thank you for your guidance!

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

I actually don't think you have a workable solution in #77, if you are working on #8 then I will close #77 so that anyone else interested can pick up on that issue.

Hi Sir , I wanted to ask you if my PR #84 get merged , Can I work on this Issue again after that . I will find a new solution and first inform you here about the approach .
I am asking this only after #84 get merged and if no one still working on this issue . Let me know if this is fine with you Sir.
Thanks !

@krisstern
Copy link
Member

Sure @biru-codeastromer, you are more than welcome to open a new PR for this issue

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

biru-codeastromer commented Jan 25, 2025

Sure @biru-codeastromer, you are more than welcome to open a new PR for this issue

Thanks Sir !

I am currently working on this and will propose a new solution too in a new PR .!

@biru-codeastromer
Copy link
Contributor

biru-codeastromer commented Jan 30, 2025

Hi Sir, I have raised a new PR #93 with a new approach !
Updating here .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
4 participants