Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ISO8601 reference may need to be split to multiple editions #48

Closed
cabo opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #51
Closed

ISO8601 reference may need to be split to multiple editions #48

cabo opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #51
Labels
has-pr

Comments

@cabo
Copy link
Member

cabo commented Jun 14, 2023

-00:00 became unambiguously outlawed only in the 2000 edition, we are referencing ISO8601:1988 throughout.

(We may also use the opportunity to point to an openly available rendition of ISO 8601:1988,
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/FIPS/fipspub4-1-1991.pdf
)
@ryzokuken
Copy link
Member

@cabo great point! Thanks for the link, I was not sure this was widely available.

@cabo
Copy link
Member Author

cabo commented Jun 14, 2023

Archived-At: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Ctib-yt0hqEn9_RA-pkPyPrNKpU

(Note that referencing a newer version would also erect a
paywall that would hamper review; please remind yourself of
the discussion we had around Archived-At:
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sedate/bvn8eA-DFWB3U1oF
hkVI-QEih0Q> ).

Per that discussion (and as now mentioned at that Github link),
if a link to the FIPS publication were added to the one to the
ISO page, with a comment like "still available at", it would
considerably mitigate my concern.

@cabo cabo mentioned this issue Jun 19, 2023
Merged
@cabo cabo added the has-pr label Jun 19, 2023
@cabo cabo closed this as completed in #51 Jun 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
has-pr
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add ISO8601:2000 reference ietf-wg-sedate/draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended
2 participants
@cabo @ryzokuken