Skip to content

Meaningful search on explorer #247

Open
@jcchavezs

Description

@jcchavezs

Currently the "Explorer/Spans" is kind of hard to digest. As a user, if choosing a service name, I'd like to chose it from a list instead of having to write it down the name:

image

This makes totally sense as service names is low cardinality and you can know them on before hand, also having to a typo on the service name can lead you to think there are no traces. For example in zipkin we show the list of services:

image

Once the service name is selected, we should refine the possibilities for Service Name as it only make sense to choose between those span names related to the service:

image

While I chose zipkin to show examples on this, UIs like Haystack or jaeger do this too

image

This is a couple of basic suggestions but in general everything that is low cardinality should be listed as it improves highly the user experience.

Same applies for known tags that we know are low cardinality e.g. status code or http method


Related issue: hypertrace/hypertrace#109

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions