You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for this lovely tool. Just spotted this behaviour that does not seem to be desired.
Here's my situation, a Linux server with two mounts: / and /var/www/virtualmin:
When I use vmtouch against /, it indicates total pages ~ 16G which aligns with filesystem usage on the / mount - so looks like vmtouch skips the mount in /var/www/virtualmin:
But when I execute it against all files in / (skipping some), it indicates total pages as 39GB which more or less aligns with total filesystem usage on both / and /var/www/virtualmin, so in this variant it includes the mount:
Hello!
Thank you for this lovely tool. Just spotted this behaviour that does not seem to be desired.
Here's my situation, a Linux server with two mounts:
/
and/var/www/virtualmin
:When I use
vmtouch
against/
, it indicates total pages ~ 16G which aligns with filesystem usage on the/
mount - so looks likevmtouch
skips the mount in/var/www/virtualmin
:But when I execute it against all files in
/
(skipping some), it indicates total pages as 39GB which more or less aligns with total filesystem usage on both/
and/var/www/virtualmin
, so in this variant it includes the mount:Is this expected? My linux version:
5.4.0-1103-aws
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: