You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When observing large objects, for efficiency it would be very useful to allow omission of certain observed keys. This was originally brought to my attention because an object I was observing contained a cyclic reference (and thus omitting it would have saved the day). In the same vein, in addition to omitting certain keys, it would be useful to allow object-observer to handle cyclic references by only observing the first instance of such keys.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The circular thing handled as part of #129 and released in 5.1.7.
The optional skip paths or other kind of approach for optioning the creation of Observable will be considered as part of the next major 6.x.x version (which I'm moving to be published as a scoped package @gullerya/object-observer), please follow up that one.
When observing large objects, for efficiency it would be very useful to allow omission of certain observed keys. This was originally brought to my attention because an object I was observing contained a cyclic reference (and thus omitting it would have saved the day). In the same vein, in addition to omitting certain keys, it would be useful to allow
object-observer
to handle cyclic references by only observing the first instance of such keys.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: