in() should be optional for single-source subject assertion chains

[kriegfrj]

Admittedly I'm pretty new to compile-testing, but I have found in my short time that the bulk of my tests consist of single source files that are designed either to exercise particular error conditions in my annotation processor. Of course given that only one file is being compiled the error will always be in that file. Currently, however, in the javaSource() subject, you still have to specify in() when checking the errors. Instead of:

ASSERT.about(javaSource())
    .that(file)
    .failsToCompile()
    .withErrorContaining("error msg")
    .in(file).onLine(1).atColumn(6);

...I'd like to be able to omit in():

ASSERT.about(javaSource())
    .that(file)
    .failsToCompile()
    .withErrorContaining("error msg")
    .onLine(1).atColumn(6);

I think it would be good to still have in() as an option (because the error might conceivably happen in another file other than your single source - eg, a generated file). However, I have already come across this pattern so many times that I think it would be a useful enhancement.