Repository navigation
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathRegisterMachine.lean
More file actions
2583 lines (2458 loc) · 136 KB
/
Copy pathRegisterMachine.lean
File metadata and controls
2583 lines (2458 loc) · 136 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
/-
Copyright (c) 2026 Google LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-/
module
public import Cryptids.Propositions
public import Cryptids.Semantics.Riemann.Dispatcher
public import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.Defs
public import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
public import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Layer 3: NQL Register Machine Verification for `riemann_744`
This file formalizes the 16-register machine compiled from `riemann.nql` (`riemann.subs`) and proves
that starting from `regInit = ⟨0, []⟩`, it halts if and only if there exists `x : ℕ` satisfying
`MatiyasevichRiemannCounterexample x`.
-/
@[expose] public section
namespace ConjectureMachines.Semantics.Riemann
open Turing (Dir)
open StateTransition
@[simp]
theorem harmNum_zero : harmNum 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem harmNum_succ (n : ℕ) :
harmNum (n + 1) = harmNum n * (n + 1) + n.factorial := rfl
/-- Least common multiple of `{1, ..., x}`. -/
def lcmUpTo (x : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(Finset.Icc 1 x).lcm id
/-!
## 1. Abstract Register Machine Definitions
-/
@[simp]
theorem regNSteps_zero (c : RegCfg) : regNSteps 0 c = some c := rfl
@[simp]
theorem regNSteps_succ (n : ℕ) (c : RegCfg) :
regNSteps (n + 1) c = (regStep c).bind (regNSteps n) := rfl
theorem regNSteps_one {c₁ c₂ : RegCfg} (h : regStep c₁ = some c₂) :
regNSteps 1 c₁ = some c₂ := by
simp [h]
theorem regNSteps_add (m n : ℕ) (c : RegCfg) :
regNSteps (m + n) c = (regNSteps m c).bind (regNSteps n) := by
induction m generalizing c with
| zero => simp
| succ m ih =>
rw [Nat.succ_add, regNSteps_succ, regNSteps_succ]
cases regStep c with
| none => rfl
| some c' => exact ih c'
theorem regNSteps_bind_eq {m n : ℕ} {c₁ c₂ c₃ : RegCfg}
(h₁ : regNSteps m c₁ = some c₂) (h₂ : regNSteps n c₂ = some c₃) :
regNSteps (m + n) c₁ = some c₃ := by
rw [regNSteps_add, h₁, Option.bind_some, h₂]
/-- The register machine halts starting from configuration `c`. -/
def RegHaltsFrom (c : RegCfg) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, regNSteps n c = none
theorem regHalts_iff_regHaltsFrom :
RegHalts ↔ RegHaltsFrom regInit := by
rw [regHalts_iff_exists_regNSteps]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, c, hn, hnone⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rw [regNSteps_add, hn, Option.bind_some, regNSteps_succ, hnone,
Option.bind_none]⟩
· rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
have haux : ∀ m (c₀ : RegCfg), regNSteps m c₀ = none → ∃ k c, regNSteps k c₀ =
some c ∧ regStep c = none := by
intro m
induction m with
| zero => intro c₀ h; cases h
| succ m ih =>
intro c₀ h
rw [regNSteps_succ] at h
rcases hs : regStep c₀ with _ | c₁
· exact ⟨0, c₀, rfl, hs⟩
· rw [hs, Option.bind_some] at h
obtain ⟨k, c, hk, hnone⟩ := ih c₁ h
exact ⟨k + 1, c, by rw [regNSteps_succ, hs, Option.bind_some, hk], hnone⟩
exact haux n regInit hn
theorem regNSteps_none_add (m n : ℕ) (c : RegCfg) (h : regNSteps m c = none) :
regNSteps (m + n) c = none := by
rw [regNSteps_add, h, Option.bind_none]
theorem regNSteps_none_of_le {m n : ℕ} {c : RegCfg} (hle : m ≤ n) (h : regNSteps m c = none) :
regNSteps n c = none := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hle
exact regNSteps_none_add m k c h
theorem regHaltsFrom_of_regNSteps {k : ℕ} {c₁ c₂ : RegCfg}
(h : regNSteps k c₁ = some c₂) :
RegHaltsFrom c₁ ↔ RegHaltsFrom c₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
have hlt : k < n := by
by_contra hle
have hnone := regNSteps_none_of_le (Nat.le_of_not_lt hle) hn
rw [h] at hnone
cases hnone
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le (Nat.le_of_lt hlt)
rw [regNSteps_add, h, Option.bind_some] at hn
exact ⟨d, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨k + n, by rw [regNSteps_add, h, Option.bind_some, hn]⟩
theorem not_regHaltsFrom_of_unbounded {c : RegCfg}
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ m c', n ≤ m ∧ regNSteps m c = some c') :
¬ RegHaltsFrom c := by
rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
obtain ⟨m, c', hle, hm⟩ := h n
have hnone := regNSteps_none_of_le hle hn
rw [hm] at hnone
cases hnone
/-!
## 2. Register Bank (`List ℕ`) Extensionality and Primitive Step Lemmas
-/
theorem getElem!_of_lt (regs : List ℕ) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < regs.length) :
regs[k]! = regs[k] := by
simp [hk]
theorem getElem!_set_self (regs : List ℕ) (k v : ℕ) (hk : k < regs.length) :
(regs.set k v)[k]! = v := by
induction regs generalizing k with
| nil => simp at hk
| cons a as ih =>
cases k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k =>
simp only [List.length_cons, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hk
exact ih k hk
theorem getElem!_set_ne (regs : List ℕ) (k j v : ℕ) (hne : k ≠ j) :
(regs.set k v)[j]! = regs[j]! := by
induction regs generalizing k j with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih =>
cases k with
| zero =>
cases j with
| zero => contradiction
| succ j => rfl
| succ k =>
cases j with
| zero => rfl
| succ j =>
exact ih k j (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem getElem!_set (regs : List ℕ) (k i v : ℕ) (hk : k < regs.length) :
(regs.set k v)[i]! = if k = i then v else regs[i]! := by
split_ifs with hki
· subst hki
exact getElem!_set_self regs k v hk
· exact getElem!_set_ne regs k i v hki
theorem regs_ext {regs₁ regs₂ : List ℕ} (h₁ : regs₁.length = 16) (h₂ : regs₂.length = 16)
(h : ∀ i < 16, regs₁[i]! = regs₂[i]!) : regs₁ = regs₂ := by
apply List.ext_getElem (by omega)
intro i hi₁ hi₂
have hi : i < 16 := by omega
have eq1 := getElem!_of_lt regs₁ i hi₁
have eq2 := getElem!_of_lt regs₂ i hi₂
rw [← eq1, ← eq2]
exact h i hi
theorem getD_zero_eq_getElem! (regs : List ℕ) (i : ℕ) : regs.getD i 0 = regs[i]! := by
induction regs generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih =>
cases i with
| zero => rfl
| succ i => exact ih i
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_0 : (0 : Fin 16).val = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_1 : (1 : Fin 16).val = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_2 : (2 : Fin 16).val = 2 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_3 : (3 : Fin 16).val = 3 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_4 : (4 : Fin 16).val = 4 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_5 : (5 : Fin 16).val = 5 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_6 : (6 : Fin 16).val = 6 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_7 : (7 : Fin 16).val = 7 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_8 : (8 : Fin 16).val = 8 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_9 : (9 : Fin 16).val = 9 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_10 : (10 : Fin 16).val = 10 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_11 : (11 : Fin 16).val = 11 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_12 : (12 : Fin 16).val = 12 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_13 : (13 : Fin 16).val = 13 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_14 : (14 : Fin 16).val = 14 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fin16_val_15 : (15 : Fin 16).val = 15 := rfl
@[simp] theorem lt16_0 : 0 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_1 : 1 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_2 : 2 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_3 : 3 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_4 : 4 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_5 : 5 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_6 : 6 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_7 : 7 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_8 : 8 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_9 : 9 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_10 : 10 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_11 : 11 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_12 : 12 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_13 : 13 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_14 : 14 < 16 := by decide
@[simp] theorem lt16_15 : 15 < 16 := by decide
macro "regs_eq " h:ident : tactic =>
`(tactic| (
apply regs_ext (by simp only [List.length_set, $h:term]) (by simp only [List.length_set,
$h:term]);
intro i hi;
simp only [getElem!_set, List.length_set, $h:term, Fin.is_lt,
lt16_0, lt16_1, lt16_2, lt16_3, lt16_4, lt16_5, lt16_6, lt16_7,
lt16_8, lt16_9, lt16_10, lt16_11, lt16_12, lt16_13, lt16_14, lt16_15,
fin16_val_0, fin16_val_1, fin16_val_2, fin16_val_3,
fin16_val_4, fin16_val_5, fin16_val_6, fin16_val_7,
fin16_val_8, fin16_val_9, fin16_val_10, fin16_val_11,
fin16_val_12, fin16_val_13, fin16_val_14, fin16_val_15];
(try split_ifs) <;>
first | rfl | contradiction | ((try subst i); first | rfl | contradiction | omega | ring)))
macro "reg_val " h:ident : tactic =>
`(tactic| (
simp only [getElem!_set, List.length_set, $h:term, Fin.is_lt,
lt16_0, lt16_1, lt16_2, lt16_3, lt16_4, lt16_5, lt16_6, lt16_7,
lt16_8, lt16_9, lt16_10, lt16_11, lt16_12, lt16_13, lt16_14, lt16_15,
fin16_val_0, fin16_val_1, fin16_val_2, fin16_val_3,
fin16_val_4, fin16_val_5, fin16_val_6, fin16_val_7,
fin16_val_8, fin16_val_9, fin16_val_10, fin16_val_11,
fin16_val_12, fin16_val_13, fin16_val_14, fin16_val_15,
Nat.reduceEqDiff, ↓reduceIte];
try ((try split_ifs) <;> first | rfl | contradiction | omega | ring)))
theorem step_incr {pc : ℕ} {k : Fin 16} (h : program pc = .incr k) (regs : List ℕ) :
regNSteps 1 ⟨pc, regs⟩ = some ⟨pc + 1, regs.set k.val (regs[k.val]! + 1)⟩ := by
unfold regNSteps regStep
rw [h]
dsimp only
rw [getD_zero_eq_getElem!]
rfl
theorem step_jump {pc target : ℕ} (h : program pc = .jump target) (regs : List ℕ) :
regNSteps 1 ⟨pc, regs⟩ = some ⟨target, regs⟩ := by
unfold regNSteps regStep
rw [h]
rfl
theorem step_decr_zero {pc : ℕ} {k : Fin 16} (h : program pc = .decr k) (regs : List ℕ)
(hz : regs[k.val]! = 0) :
regNSteps 1 ⟨pc, regs⟩ = some ⟨pc + 1, regs⟩ := by
unfold regNSteps regStep
rw [h]
dsimp only
rw [getD_zero_eq_getElem!, hz]
rfl
theorem step_decr_pos {pc : ℕ} {k : Fin 16} (h : program pc = .decr k) (regs : List ℕ)
{v : ℕ} (hv : regs[k.val]! = v + 1) :
regNSteps 1 ⟨pc, regs⟩ = some ⟨pc + 2, regs.set k.val v⟩ := by
unfold regNSteps regStep
rw [h]
dsimp only
rw [getD_zero_eq_getElem!, hv]
rfl
theorem step_halt {pc : ℕ} (h : program pc = .halt) (regs : List ℕ) :
regNSteps 1 ⟨pc, regs⟩ = none := by
unfold regNSteps regStep
rw [h]
rfl
/-!
## 3. Parametric Subroutine Verification (`transfer`, `copy_add`, `mul`, `decr_pair`, `div`, `sub`)
-/
def isNoopTo (pc target : ℕ) : Bool :=
(program pc == .jump target) ||
match program pc with
| .jump mid =>
(program mid == .jump target) ||
match program mid with
| .jump mid2 => program mid2 == .jump target
| _ => false
| _ => false
theorem exec_noop_to {pc target : ℕ} (h : isNoopTo pc target = true) (regs : List ℕ) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨pc, regs⟩ = some ⟨target, regs⟩ := by
unfold isNoopTo at h
rw [Bool.or_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with h1 | h2
· exact ⟨1, by omega, step_jump h1 regs⟩
· rcases hp : program pc with _ | _ | _ | mid | _ <;> rw [hp] at h2 <;> try cases h2
rw [Bool.or_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h2
rcases h2 with h2 | h3
· exact ⟨2, by omega, regNSteps_bind_eq (step_jump hp regs) (step_jump h2 regs)⟩
· rcases hm : program mid with _ | _ | _ | mid2 | _ <;> rw [hm] at h3 <;> try cases h3
rw [beq_iff_eq] at h3
exact ⟨3, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (step_jump hp regs) (step_jump hm regs)) (step_jump h3
regs)⟩
def isReachOrEq (pc target : ℕ) : Bool :=
(pc == target) || isNoopTo pc target
theorem exec_reach_or_eq {pc target : ℕ} (h : isReachOrEq pc target = true) (regs : List ℕ) :
∃ s, regNSteps s ⟨pc, regs⟩ = some ⟨target, regs⟩ := by
unfold isReachOrEq at h
rw [Bool.or_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with rfl | h2
· exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨s, _, hs⟩ := exec_noop_to h2 regs
exact ⟨s, hs⟩
def isTransfer1 (base : ℕ) (r : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(program base == .decr r) &&
(program (base + 1) == .jump (base + 3)) &&
(program (base + 2) == .jump base) &&
(program (base + 3) == .jump (base + 4))
theorem exec_transfer1_aux {base : ℕ} {r : Fin 16}
(h0 : program base = .decr r)
(h1 : program (base + 1) = .jump (base + 3))
(h2 : program (base + 2) = .jump base)
(h3 : program (base + 3) = .jump (base + 4)) :
∀ (v : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[r.val]! = v →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ = some ⟨base + 4, regs.set r.val 0⟩
| 0, regs, hlen, hv => by
have s1 := step_decr_zero h0 regs hv
have s2 := step_jump h1 regs
have s3 := step_jump h3 regs
refine ⟨3, by omega, ?_⟩
have hste := regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3
have hset : regs.set r.val 0 = regs := by regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact hste
| v + 1, regs, hlen, hv => by
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs hv
have s2 := step_jump h2 (regs.set r.val v)
have hlen' : (regs.set r.val v).length = 16 := by simp [hlen]
have hv' : (regs.set r.val v)[r.val]! = v := by simp [hlen]
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_transfer1_aux h0 h1 h2 h3 v (regs.set r.val v) hlen' hv'
have hset : (regs.set r.val v).set r.val 0 = regs.set r.val 0 := by regs_eq hlen
rw [hset] at ih
exact ⟨2 + s, by omega, regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) ih⟩
theorem exec_transfer1 {base : ℕ} {r : Fin 16} (h : isTransfer1 base r = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ = some ⟨base + 4, regs.set r.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isTransfer1 at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨h0, h1⟩, h2⟩, h3⟩
exact exec_transfer1_aux h0 h1 h2 h3 regs[r.val]! regs hlen rfl
def isTransfer2 (base : ℕ) (r dst : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(r != dst) &&
(program base == .decr r) &&
(program (base + 1) == .jump (base + 4)) &&
(program (base + 2) == .incr dst) &&
(program (base + 3) == .jump base)
theorem exec_transfer2_aux {base : ℕ} {r dst : Fin 16} (hne : r.val ≠ dst.val)
(h0 : program base = .decr r)
(h1 : program (base + 1) = .jump (base + 4))
(h2 : program (base + 2) = .incr dst)
(h3 : program (base + 3) = .jump base) :
∀ (v : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[r.val]! = v →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 4, (regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + v)).set r.val 0⟩
| 0, regs, hlen, hv => by
have s1 := step_decr_zero h0 regs hv
have s2 := step_jump h1 regs
refine ⟨2, by omega, ?_⟩
have hset : (regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + 0)).set r.val 0 = regs := by regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2
| v + 1, regs, hlen, hv => by
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs hv
let regs1 := regs.set r.val v
have s2 := step_incr h2 regs1
let regs2 := regs1.set dst.val (regs1[dst.val]! + 1)
have s3 := step_jump h3 regs2
have hlen2 : regs2.length = 16 := by simp [regs2, regs1, hlen]
have hv2 : regs2[r.val]! = v := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, r.is_lt, dst.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_transfer2_aux hne h0 h1 h2 h3 v regs2 hlen2 hv2
have hdst2 : regs2[dst.val]! = regs[dst.val]! + 1 := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, r.is_lt, dst.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have heq : (regs2.set dst.val (regs2[dst.val]! + v)).set r.val 0 =
(regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + (v + 1))).set r.val 0 := by
rw [hdst2]
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨3 + s, by omega, regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) ih⟩
theorem exec_transfer2 {base : ℕ} {r dst : Fin 16} (h : isTransfer2 base r dst = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 4, (regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + regs[r.val]!)).set r.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isTransfer2 at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨hne', h0⟩, h1⟩, h2⟩, h3⟩
have hne : r.val ≠ dst.val := fun heq => hne' (Fin.ext heq)
exact exec_transfer2_aux hne h0 h1 h2 h3 regs[r.val]! regs hlen rfl
def isTransfer3 (base : ℕ) (r dst1 dst2 : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(r != dst1) && (r != dst2) && (dst1 != dst2) &&
(program base == .decr r) &&
(program (base + 1) == .jump (base + 5)) &&
(program (base + 2) == .incr dst1) &&
(program (base + 3) == .incr dst2) &&
(program (base + 4) == .jump base) &&
(program (base + 5) == .jump (base + 6)) &&
(program (base + 6) == .jump (base + 8))
theorem exec_transfer3_aux {base : ℕ} {r dst1 dst2 : Fin 16}
(hne1 : r.val ≠ dst1.val) (hne2 : r.val ≠ dst2.val) (hne12 : dst1.val ≠ dst2.val)
(h0 : program base = .decr r)
(h1 : program (base + 1) = .jump (base + 5))
(h2 : program (base + 2) = .incr dst1)
(h3 : program (base + 3) = .incr dst2)
(h4 : program (base + 4) = .jump base)
(h5 : program (base + 5) = .jump (base + 6))
(h6 : program (base + 6) = .jump (base + 8)) :
∀ (v : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[r.val]! = v →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 8,
((regs.set dst1.val (regs[dst1.val]! + v)).set dst2.val (regs[dst2.val]! +
v)).set r.val 0⟩
| 0, regs, hlen, hv => by
have s1 := step_decr_zero h0 regs hv
have s2 := step_jump h1 regs
have s3 := step_jump h5 regs
have s4 := step_jump h6 regs
refine ⟨4, by omega, ?_⟩
have hset : ((regs.set dst1.val (regs[dst1.val]! + 0)).set dst2.val (regs[dst2.val]! +
0)).set r.val 0 = regs := by regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) s4
| v + 1, regs, hlen, hv => by
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs hv
let regs1 := regs.set r.val v
have s2 := step_incr h2 regs1
let regs2 := regs1.set dst1.val (regs1[dst1.val]! + 1)
have s3 := step_incr h3 regs2
let regs3 := regs2.set dst2.val (regs2[dst2.val]! + 1)
have s4 := step_jump h4 regs3
have hlen3 : regs3.length = 16 := by simp [regs3, regs2, regs1, hlen]
have hv3 : regs3[r.val]! = v := by
simp only [regs3, regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, r.is_lt, dst1.is_lt,
dst2.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_transfer3_aux hne1 hne2 hne12 h0 h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 v regs3 hlen3 hv3
have hdst1_3 : regs3[dst1.val]! = regs[dst1.val]! + 1 := by
simp only [regs3, regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, r.is_lt, dst1.is_lt,
dst2.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hdst2_3 : regs3[dst2.val]! = regs[dst2.val]! + 1 := by
simp only [regs3, regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, r.is_lt, dst1.is_lt,
dst2.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have heq : ((regs3.set dst1.val (regs3[dst1.val]! + v)).set dst2.val (regs3[dst2.val]! +
v)).set r.val 0 =
((regs.set dst1.val (regs[dst1.val]! + (v + 1))).set dst2.val (regs[dst2.val]! + (v +
1))).set r.val 0 := by
rw [hdst1_3, hdst2_3]
dsimp only [regs3, regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨4 + s, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) s4) ih⟩
theorem exec_transfer3 {base : ℕ} {r dst1 dst2 : Fin 16} (h : isTransfer3 base r dst1 dst2 = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 8,
((regs.set dst1.val (regs[dst1.val]! + regs[r.val]!)).set dst2.val (regs[dst2.val]! +
regs[r.val]!)).set r.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isTransfer3 at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hne1', hne2'⟩, hne12'⟩, h0⟩, h1⟩, h2⟩, h3⟩, h4⟩, h5⟩, h6⟩
have hne1 : r.val ≠ dst1.val := fun heq => hne1' (Fin.ext heq)
have hne2 : r.val ≠ dst2.val := fun heq => hne2' (Fin.ext heq)
have hne12 : dst1.val ≠ dst2.val := fun heq => hne12' (Fin.ext heq)
exact exec_transfer3_aux hne1 hne2 hne12 h0 h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 regs[r.val]! regs hlen rfl
def isCopyAdd (base : ℕ) (src dst tmp : Fin 16) : Bool :=
isTransfer3 base src dst tmp && isTransfer2 (base + 8) tmp src
theorem exec_copy_add {base : ℕ} {src dst tmp : Fin 16} (h : isCopyAdd base src dst tmp = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) (htmp : regs[tmp.val]! = 0) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 12, regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + regs[src.val]!)⟩ := by
have h' := h
unfold isCopyAdd at h'
rw [Bool.and_eq_true] at h'
obtain ⟨h3, h2⟩ := h'
have h3_props := h3
unfold isTransfer3 at h3_props
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h3_props
rcases h3_props with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hne1', hne2'⟩, hne12'⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩
have hne1 : src.val ≠ dst.val := fun heq => hne1' (Fin.ext heq)
have hne2 : src.val ≠ tmp.val := fun heq => hne2' (Fin.ext heq)
have hne12 : dst.val ≠ tmp.val := fun heq => hne12' (Fin.ext heq)
obtain ⟨s1, hs1, step1⟩ := exec_transfer3 h3 regs hlen
let regs1 := ((regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! +
regs[src.val]!)).set tmp.val (regs[tmp.val]! + regs[src.val]!)).set src.val 0
have hlen1 : regs1.length = 16 := by simp [regs1, hlen]
obtain ⟨s2, hs2, step2⟩ := exec_transfer2 h2 regs1 hlen1
refine ⟨s1 + s2, by omega, ?_⟩
have hcomb := regNSteps_bind_eq step1 step2
have heq_pc : base + 8 + 4 = base + 12 := by omega
have hsrc1 : regs1[src.val]! = 0 := by simp [regs1, hlen]
have htmp1 : regs1[tmp.val]! = regs[src.val]! := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, dst.is_lt, tmp.is_lt, src.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have heq_regs : (regs1.set src.val (regs1[src.val]! + regs1[tmp.val]!)).set tmp.val 0 =
regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + regs[src.val]!) := by
rw [hsrc1, htmp1, Nat.zero_add]
dsimp only [regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq_pc, heq_regs] at hcomb
exact hcomb
def isMulLoop (base mid end_pc : ℕ) (cnt src dst tmp : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(cnt != src) && (cnt != dst) && (cnt != tmp) &&
(src != dst) && (src != tmp) && (dst != tmp) &&
(program base == .decr cnt) &&
(program (base + 1) == .jump end_pc) &&
isNoopTo (base + 2) mid &&
isCopyAdd mid src dst tmp &&
(program (mid + 12) == .jump base)
theorem exec_mul_loop_aux {base mid end_pc : ℕ} {cnt src dst tmp : Fin 16}
(hcnt_src : cnt.val ≠ src.val) (hcnt_dst : cnt.val ≠ dst.val) (hcnt_tmp : cnt.val ≠ tmp.val)
(hsrc_dst : src.val ≠ dst.val) (hsrc_tmp : src.val ≠ tmp.val) (hdst_tmp : dst.val ≠ tmp.val)
(h0 : program base = .decr cnt)
(h1 : program (base + 1) = .jump end_pc)
(hnoop : isNoopTo (base + 2) mid = true)
(hcopy : isCopyAdd mid src dst tmp = true)
(hback : program (mid + 12) = .jump base) :
∀ (v : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[cnt.val]! = v → regs[tmp.val]! = 0 →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨end_pc, (regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + v * regs[src.val]!)).set cnt.val 0⟩
| 0, regs, hlen, hv, htmp => by
have s1 := step_decr_zero h0 regs hv
have s2 := step_jump h1 regs
refine ⟨2, by omega, ?_⟩
have hset : (regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + 0 * regs[src.val]!)).set cnt.val 0 = regs := by
rw [Nat.zero_mul, Nat.add_zero]
regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2
| v + 1, regs, hlen, hv, htmp => by
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs hv
let regs1 := regs.set cnt.val v
obtain ⟨sn, hsn, s2⟩ := exec_noop_to hnoop regs1
have hlen1 : regs1.length = 16 := by simp [regs1, hlen]
have htmp1 : regs1[tmp.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, cnt.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨sc, hsc, s3⟩ := exec_copy_add hcopy regs1 hlen1 htmp1
let regs2 := regs1.set dst.val (regs1[dst.val]! + regs1[src.val]!)
have s4 := step_jump hback regs2
have hlen2 : regs2.length = 16 := by simp [regs2, regs1, hlen]
have hv2 : regs2[cnt.val]! = v := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, cnt.is_lt, dst.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have htmp2 : regs2[tmp.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, cnt.is_lt, dst.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_mul_loop_aux
hcnt_src hcnt_dst hcnt_tmp hsrc_dst hsrc_tmp hdst_tmp
h0 h1 hnoop hcopy hback v regs2 hlen2 hv2 htmp2
have hdst2 : regs2[dst.val]! = regs[dst.val]! + regs[src.val]! := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, cnt.is_lt, dst.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hsrc2 : regs2[src.val]! = regs[src.val]! := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, cnt.is_lt, dst.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have heq : (regs2.set dst.val (regs2[dst.val]! + v * regs2[src.val]!)).set cnt.val 0 =
(regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + (v + 1) * regs[src.val]!)).set cnt.val 0 := by
rw [hdst2, hsrc2]
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨1 + sn + sc + 1 + s, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) s4) ih⟩
theorem exec_mul_loop {base mid end_pc : ℕ} {cnt src dst tmp : Fin 16}
(h : isMulLoop base mid end_pc cnt src dst tmp = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) (htmp : regs[tmp.val]! = 0) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨end_pc,
(regs.set dst.val (regs[dst.val]! + regs[cnt.val]! * regs[src.val]!)).set cnt.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isMulLoop at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨h1, h2⟩, h3⟩, h4⟩, h5⟩, h6⟩, h7⟩, h8⟩, h9⟩, h10⟩, h11⟩
exact exec_mul_loop_aux
(fun e => h1 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h2 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h3 (Fin.ext e))
(fun e => h4 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h5 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h6 (Fin.ext e))
h7 h8 h9 h10 h11 regs[cnt.val]! regs hlen rfl htmp
def isDecrPair (base tA tB : ℕ) (rA rB : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(rA != rB) &&
(program base == .decr rA) &&
(program (base + 1) == .jump tA) &&
(program (base + 2) == .decr rB) &&
(program (base + 3) == .jump tB) &&
(program (base + 4) == .jump base)
theorem exec_decr_pair_le_aux {base tA : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16} (hne : rA.val ≠ rB.val)
(h0 : program base = .decr rA)
(h1 : program (base + 1) = .jump tA)
(h2 : program (base + 2) = .decr rB)
(h4 : program (base + 4) = .jump base) :
∀ (a b : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[rA.val]! = a → regs[rB.val]! = b → a ≤ b →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨tA, (regs.set rB.val (b - a)).set rA.val 0⟩
| 0, b, regs, hlen, ha, hb, _ => by
have s1 := step_decr_zero h0 regs ha
have s2 := step_jump h1 regs
refine ⟨2, by omega, ?_⟩
have hset : (regs.set rB.val (b - 0)).set rA.val 0 = regs := by regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2
| a + 1, b, regs, hlen, ha, hb, hle => by
obtain ⟨b', rfl⟩ : ∃ b', b = b' + 1 := ⟨b - 1, by omega⟩
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs ha
let regs1 := regs.set rA.val a
have hb1 : regs1[rB.val]! = b' + 1 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, rA.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have s2 := step_decr_pos h2 regs1 hb1
let regs2 := regs1.set rB.val b'
have s3 := step_jump h4 regs2
have hlen2 : regs2.length = 16 := by simp [regs2, regs1, hlen]
have ha2 : regs2[rA.val]! = a := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hb2 : regs2[rB.val]! = b' := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_decr_pair_le_aux hne h0 h1 h2 h4 a b' regs2 hlen2 ha2 hb2 (by omega)
have heq : (regs2.set rB.val (b' - a)).set rA.val 0 =
(regs.set rB.val (b' + 1 - (a + 1))).set rA.val 0 := by
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨3 + s, by omega, regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) ih⟩
theorem exec_decr_pair_le {base tA tB : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16}
(h : isDecrPair base tA tB rA rB = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) (hle : regs[rA.val]! ≤ regs[rB.val]!) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨tA, (regs.set rB.val (regs[rB.val]! - regs[rA.val]!)).set rA.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isDecrPair at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hne', h0⟩, h1⟩, h2⟩, _⟩, h4⟩
exact exec_decr_pair_le_aux (fun e => hne' (Fin.ext e)) h0 h1 h2 h4
regs[rA.val]! regs[rB.val]! regs hlen rfl rfl hle
theorem exec_decr_pair_gt_aux {base tB : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16} (hne : rA.val ≠ rB.val)
(h0 : program base = .decr rA)
(h2 : program (base + 2) = .decr rB)
(h3 : program (base + 3) = .jump tB)
(h4 : program (base + 4) = .jump base) :
∀ (b a : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[rA.val]! = a → regs[rB.val]! = b → b < a →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨tB, (regs.set rA.val (a - 1 - b)).set rB.val 0⟩
| 0, a, regs, hlen, ha, hb, hgt => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ : ∃ a', a = a' + 1 := ⟨a - 1, by omega⟩
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs ha
let regs1 := regs.set rA.val a'
have hb1 : regs1[rB.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, rA.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have s2 := step_decr_zero h2 regs1 hb1
have s3 := step_jump h3 regs1
refine ⟨3, by omega, ?_⟩
have hset : (regs.set rA.val (a' + 1 - 1 - 0)).set rB.val 0 = regs1 := by
dsimp only [regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3
| b + 1, a, regs, hlen, ha, hb, hgt => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ : ∃ a', a = a' + 1 := ⟨a - 1, by omega⟩
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs ha
let regs1 := regs.set rA.val a'
have hb1 : regs1[rB.val]! = b + 1 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, rA.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have s2 := step_decr_pos h2 regs1 hb1
let regs2 := regs1.set rB.val b
have s3 := step_jump h4 regs2
have hlen2 : regs2.length = 16 := by simp [regs2, regs1, hlen]
have ha2 : regs2[rA.val]! = a' := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hb2 : regs2[rB.val]! = b := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_decr_pair_gt_aux hne h0 h2 h3 h4 b a' regs2 hlen2 ha2 hb2 (by omega)
have heq : (regs2.set rA.val (a' - 1 - b)).set rB.val 0 =
(regs.set rA.val (a' + 1 - 1 - (b + 1))).set rB.val 0 := by
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨3 + s, by omega, regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) ih⟩
theorem exec_decr_pair_gt {base tA tB : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16}
(h : isDecrPair base tA tB rA rB = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) (hgt : regs[rB.val]! < regs[rA.val]!) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨tB, (regs.set rA.val (regs[rA.val]! - 1 - regs[rB.val]!)).set rB.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isDecrPair at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hne', h0⟩, _⟩, h2⟩, h3⟩, h4⟩
exact exec_decr_pair_gt_aux (fun e => hne' (Fin.ext e)) h0 h2 h3 h4
regs[rB.val]! regs[rA.val]! regs hlen rfl rfl hgt
def isDivLoop (base : ℕ) (div_reg cnt_reg rem_reg quot_reg tmp_reg : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(div_reg != cnt_reg) && (div_reg != rem_reg) && (div_reg != quot_reg) && (div_reg != tmp_reg) &&
(cnt_reg != rem_reg) && (cnt_reg != quot_reg) && (cnt_reg != tmp_reg) &&
(rem_reg != quot_reg) && (rem_reg != tmp_reg) && (quot_reg != tmp_reg) &&
(program base == .jump (base + 4)) &&
isCopyAdd (base + 4) div_reg cnt_reg tmp_reg &&
isDecrPair (base + 16) (base + 21) (base + 23) cnt_reg rem_reg &&
(program (base + 21) == .incr quot_reg) &&
(program (base + 22) == .jump base) &&
(program (base + 23) == .jump (base + 24)) &&
isTransfer1 (base + 24) cnt_reg
set_option maxHeartbeats 800000 in -- large decide / symbolic evaluation
theorem exec_div_loop_aux {base : ℕ} {div_reg cnt_reg rem_reg quot_reg tmp_reg : Fin 16}
(_h1 : div_reg.val ≠ cnt_reg.val) (h2 : div_reg.val ≠ rem_reg.val)
(h3 : div_reg.val ≠ quot_reg.val) (h4 : div_reg.val ≠ tmp_reg.val)
(h5 : cnt_reg.val ≠ rem_reg.val) (h6 : cnt_reg.val ≠ quot_reg.val)
(h7 : cnt_reg.val ≠ tmp_reg.val) (h8 : rem_reg.val ≠ quot_reg.val)
(h9 : rem_reg.val ≠ tmp_reg.val) (h10 : quot_reg.val ≠ tmp_reg.val)
(hj0 : program base = .jump (base + 4))
(hcopy : isCopyAdd (base + 4) div_reg cnt_reg tmp_reg = true)
(hpair : isDecrPair (base + 16) (base + 21) (base + 23) cnt_reg rem_reg = true)
(hincr : program (base + 21) = .incr quot_reg)
(hback : program (base + 22) = .jump base)
(hj23 : program (base + 23) = .jump (base + 24))
(htr1 : isTransfer1 (base + 24) cnt_reg = true)
(rem : ℕ) :
∀ (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 →
0 < regs[div_reg.val]! → regs[rem_reg.val]! = rem →
regs[cnt_reg.val]! = 0 → regs[tmp_reg.val]! = 0 →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 28,
(regs.set quot_reg.val (regs[quot_reg.val]! +
rem / regs[div_reg.val]!)).set rem_reg.val 0⟩ := by
induction rem using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind rem ih =>
intro regs hlen hdiv_pos hrem hcnt htmp
set d := regs[div_reg.val]!
have s1 := step_jump hj0 regs
obtain ⟨sc, hsc, s2⟩ := exec_copy_add hcopy regs hlen htmp
let regs1 := regs.set cnt_reg.val (regs[cnt_reg.val]! + d)
have hlen1 : regs1.length = 16 := by simp [regs1, hlen]
have hcnt1 : regs1[cnt_reg.val]! = d := by
simp only [regs1, d, getElem!_set, hlen, cnt_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hrem1 : regs1[rem_reg.val]! = rem := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, cnt_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
by_cases hlt : rem < d
· have hgt1 : regs1[rem_reg.val]! < regs1[cnt_reg.val]! := by omega
obtain ⟨sp, hsp, s3⟩ := exec_decr_pair_gt hpair regs1 hlen1 hgt1
let regs2 := (regs1.set cnt_reg.val (regs1[cnt_reg.val]! - 1 -
regs1[rem_reg.val]!)).set rem_reg.val 0
have s4 := step_jump hj23 regs2
have hlen2 : regs2.length = 16 := by simp [regs2, regs1, hlen]
obtain ⟨st, hst, s5⟩ := exec_transfer1 htr1 regs2 hlen2
have hdiv_zero : rem / d = 0 := Nat.div_eq_of_lt hlt
have heq_pc : base + 24 + 4 = base + 28 := by omega
have heq_regs : regs2.set cnt_reg.val 0 =
(regs.set quot_reg.val (regs[quot_reg.val]! + rem / d)).set rem_reg.val 0 := by
rw [hdiv_zero, Nat.add_zero]
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq_pc, heq_regs] at s5
exact ⟨1 + sc + sp + 1 + st, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) s4)
s5⟩
· have hle : d ≤ rem := Nat.le_of_not_lt hlt
have hle1 : regs1[cnt_reg.val]! ≤ regs1[rem_reg.val]! := by omega
obtain ⟨sp, hsp, s3⟩ := exec_decr_pair_le hpair regs1 hlen1 hle1
let regs2 := regs.set rem_reg.val (rem - d)
have hregs2 : (regs1.set rem_reg.val (regs1[rem_reg.val]! -
regs1[cnt_reg.val]!)).set cnt_reg.val 0 = regs2 := by
rw [hrem1, hcnt1]
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [hregs2] at s3
have s4 := step_incr hincr regs2
let regs3 := (regs.set rem_reg.val (rem - d)).set quot_reg.val (regs[quot_reg.val]! + 1)
have hquot2 : regs2[quot_reg.val]! = regs[quot_reg.val]! := by
simp only [regs2, getElem!_set, hlen, rem_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hregs3 : regs2.set quot_reg.val (regs2[quot_reg.val]! + 1) = regs3 := by
rw [hquot2]
rw [hregs3] at s4
have s5 := step_jump hback regs3
have hlen3 : regs3.length = 16 := by simp [regs3, hlen]
have hdiv3 : regs3[div_reg.val]! = d := by
simp only [regs3, d, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rem_reg.is_lt, quot_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hrem3 : regs3[rem_reg.val]! = rem - d := by
simp only [regs3, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rem_reg.is_lt, quot_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hcnt3 : regs3[cnt_reg.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs3, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rem_reg.is_lt, quot_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have htmp3 : regs3[tmp_reg.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs3, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rem_reg.is_lt, quot_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hquot3 : regs3[quot_reg.val]! = regs[quot_reg.val]! + 1 := by
simp only [regs3, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rem_reg.is_lt, quot_reg.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have hdiv_pos3 : 0 < regs3[div_reg.val]! := by omega
obtain ⟨s_ih, hs_ih, step_ih⟩ :=
ih (rem - d) (by omega) regs3 hlen3 hdiv_pos3 hrem3 hcnt3 htmp3
have hdiv_eq : rem / d = (rem - d) / d + 1 := Nat.div_eq_sub_div hdiv_pos hle
have heq_regs : (regs3.set quot_reg.val (regs3[quot_reg.val]! +
(rem - d) / regs3[div_reg.val]!)).set rem_reg.val 0 =
(regs.set quot_reg.val (regs[quot_reg.val]! + rem / d)).set rem_reg.val 0 := by
rw [hquot3, hdiv3, hdiv_eq]
dsimp only [regs3]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq_regs] at step_ih
exact ⟨1 + sc + sp + 1 + 1 + s_ih, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq
(regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) s4) s5) step_ih⟩
theorem exec_div_loop {base : ℕ} {div_reg cnt_reg rem_reg quot_reg tmp_reg : Fin 16}
(h : isDivLoop base div_reg cnt_reg rem_reg quot_reg tmp_reg = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16)
(hdiv_pos : 0 < regs[div_reg.val]!)
(hcnt : regs[cnt_reg.val]! = 0) (htmp : regs[tmp_reg.val]! = 0) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 28,
(regs.set quot_reg.val (regs[quot_reg.val]! +
regs[rem_reg.val]! / regs[div_reg.val]!)).set rem_reg.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isDivLoop at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨h1, h2⟩, h3⟩, h4⟩, h5⟩, h6⟩, h7⟩, h8⟩, h9⟩, h10⟩, hj0⟩, hcopy⟩,
hpair⟩, hincr⟩, hback⟩, hj23⟩, htr1⟩
exact exec_div_loop_aux
(fun e => h1 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h2 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h3 (Fin.ext e))
(fun e => h4 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h5 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h6 (Fin.ext e))
(fun e => h7 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h8 (Fin.ext e)) (fun e => h9 (Fin.ext e))
(fun e => h10 (Fin.ext e))
hj0 hcopy hpair hincr hback hj23 htr1 regs[rem_reg.val]! regs hlen hdiv_pos rfl hcnt htmp
def isSubLoop (base : ℕ) (rA rB : Fin 16) : Bool :=
(rA != rB) &&
(program base == .decr rA) &&
(program (base + 1) == .jump (base + 5)) &&
(program (base + 2) == .decr rB) &&
(program (base + 3) == .jump (base + 4)) &&
(program (base + 4) == .jump base)
theorem exec_sub_loop_aux {base : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16} (hne : rA.val ≠ rB.val)
(h0 : program base = .decr rA)
(h1 : program (base + 1) = .jump (base + 5))
(h2 : program (base + 2) = .decr rB)
(h3 : program (base + 3) = .jump (base + 4))
(h4 : program (base + 4) = .jump base) :
∀ (a : ℕ) (regs : List ℕ), regs.length = 16 → regs[rA.val]! = a →
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 5, (regs.set rB.val (regs[rB.val]! - a)).set rA.val 0⟩
| 0, regs, hlen, ha => by
have s1 := step_decr_zero h0 regs ha
have s2 := step_jump h1 regs
refine ⟨2, by omega, ?_⟩
have hset : (regs.set rB.val (regs[rB.val]! - 0)).set rA.val 0 = regs := by regs_eq hlen
rw [hset]
exact regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2
| a + 1, regs, hlen, ha => by
have s1 := step_decr_pos h0 regs ha
let regs1 := regs.set rA.val a
have hlen1 : regs1.length = 16 := by simp [regs1, hlen]
rcases hb : regs[rB.val]! with _ | b
· have hb1 : regs1[rB.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, rA.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have s2 := step_decr_zero h2 regs1 hb1
have s3 := step_jump h3 regs1
have s4 := step_jump h4 regs1
have ha1 : regs1[rA.val]! = a := by simp [regs1, hlen]
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_sub_loop_aux hne h0 h1 h2 h3 h4 a regs1 hlen1 ha1
have heq : (regs1.set rB.val (regs1[rB.val]! - a)).set rA.val 0 =
(regs.set rB.val (0 - (a + 1))).set rA.val 0 := by
rw [hb1]
dsimp only [regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨4 + s, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) s4)
ih⟩
· have hb1 : regs1[rB.val]! = b + 1 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, hlen, rA.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have s2 := step_decr_pos h2 regs1 hb1
let regs2 := regs1.set rB.val b
have s3 := step_jump h4 regs2
have hlen2 : regs2.length = 16 := by simp [regs2, regs1, hlen]
have ha2 : regs2[rA.val]! = a := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
obtain ⟨s, hs, ih⟩ := exec_sub_loop_aux hne h0 h1 h2 h3 h4 a regs2 hlen2 ha2
have hb2 : regs2[rB.val]! = b := by
simp only [regs2, regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have heq : (regs2.set rB.val (regs2[rB.val]! - a)).set rA.val 0 =
(regs.set rB.val (b + 1 - (a + 1))).set rA.val 0 := by
rw [hb2]
dsimp only [regs2, regs1]
regs_eq hlen
rw [heq] at ih
exact ⟨3 + s, by omega,
regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq s1 s2) s3) ih⟩
theorem exec_sub_loop {base : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16} (h : isSubLoop base rA rB = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨base + 5, (regs.set rB.val (regs[rB.val]! - regs[rA.val]!)).set rA.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isSubLoop at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, bne_iff_ne, ne_eq, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hne', h0⟩, h1⟩, h2⟩, h3⟩, h4⟩
exact exec_sub_loop_aux (fun e => hne' (Fin.ext e)) h0 h1 h2 h3 h4 regs[rA.val]! regs hlen rfl
/-!
## 4. Comparison Gadgets (`isCmpBranch`, `isLeBranch`), `isSquareAssign`, and Unrolled `x > 253`
-/
def isCmpBranch (base eq_pc lt_pc gt_pc : ℕ) (rA rB : Fin 16) : Bool :=
isDecrPair base (base + 5) (base + 12) rA rB &&
(program (base + 5) == .decr rB) &&
(program (base + 6) == .jump eq_pc) &&
isTransfer1 (base + 7) rB &&
(program (base + 11) == .jump lt_pc) &&
isNoopTo (base + 12) (base + 15) &&
isTransfer1 (base + 15) rA &&
isReachOrEq (base + 19) gt_pc
theorem exec_cmp_branch_eq {base eq_pc lt_pc gt_pc : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16}
(h : isCmpBranch base eq_pc lt_pc gt_pc rA rB = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) (heq : regs[rA.val]! = regs[rB.val]!) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨eq_pc, (regs.set rB.val 0).set rA.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isCmpBranch at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hpair, h5⟩, h6⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩
obtain ⟨s1, hs1, step1⟩ := exec_decr_pair_le hpair regs hlen (by omega)
let regs1 := (regs.set rB.val 0).set rA.val 0
have hsub : regs[rB.val]! - regs[rA.val]! = 0 := by omega
rw [hsub] at step1
have hb1 : regs1[rB.val]! = 0 := by
simp only [regs1, getElem!_set, List.length_set, hlen, rA.is_lt, rB.is_lt]
split_ifs <;> omega
have step2 := step_decr_zero h5 regs1 hb1
have step3 := step_jump h6 regs1
exact ⟨s1 + 1 + 1, by omega, regNSteps_bind_eq (regNSteps_bind_eq step1 step2) step3⟩
theorem exec_cmp_branch_lt {base eq_pc lt_pc gt_pc : ℕ} {rA rB : Fin 16}
(h : isCmpBranch base eq_pc lt_pc gt_pc rA rB = true)
(regs : List ℕ) (hlen : regs.length = 16) (hlt : regs[rA.val]! < regs[rB.val]!) :
∃ s, 1 ≤ s ∧ regNSteps s ⟨base, regs⟩ =
some ⟨lt_pc, (regs.set rB.val 0).set rA.val 0⟩ := by
unfold isCmpBranch at h
simp only [Bool.and_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨hpair, h5⟩, _⟩, htrB⟩, h11⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩
have hne : rA.val ≠ rB.val := by