Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CharacterBody doc should be consistent on mentionning move_and_slide or not #10681

Open
LekloOno opened this issue Feb 12, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
area:class reference Issues and PRs about the class reference, which should be addressed on the Godot engine repository topic:physics topic:2d topic:3d

Comments

@LekloOno
Copy link

Your Godot version: 4.3

Issue description: A simple consistency issue which might make the documentation a little confusing : Some properties of CharacterBody specify that they only modify the behavior of move_and_slide, and some don't, although they also do.

The documentation should either never specify that it affects move_and_slide as it is implicit, and eventually have a general mention that all x properties refers to move_and_slide, or always specify it refers to move_and_slide.

Otherwise, it makes it confusing, one could think the non specified properties do also affect move_and_collide.

URL to the documentation page (if already existing):

CharacterBody3D

CharacterBody2D

@tetrapod00 tetrapod00 added area:class reference Issues and PRs about the class reference, which should be addressed on the Godot engine repository topic:physics topic:2d topic:3d labels Feb 12, 2025
@tetrapod00
Copy link
Contributor

Possibly we should update this section in some way when doing so. It's already somewhat redundant with the class reference, listing stuff like default values.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:class reference Issues and PRs about the class reference, which should be addressed on the Godot engine repository topic:physics topic:2d topic:3d
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants