Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 8, 2026

Completed: Compare Agentic Campaigns to GitHub Security Campaigns

  • Create comparison documentation in campaigns section
  • Document key differences between agentic campaigns and GitHub security campaigns
  • Add comparison to astro.config.mjs sidebar
  • Add link from campaigns overview page
  • Review and finalize content
  • Clarify Enterprise Cloud requirement for REST API integration example
  • Streamline documentation - remove repetition and bloat

Summary

Created concise comparison documentation between GitHub Agentic Workflows campaigns and GitHub's Security Campaigns feature.

Reduced from 285 to 65 lines (77% reduction) to improve clarity and remove redundancy while maintaining all essential information.

The streamlined document includes:

  • Clear opening definitions: Concise descriptions of both campaign types
  • Key differences table: Side-by-side comparison of 6 core aspects
  • When to use each: Direct guidance on choosing the right tool
  • Integration example: Working code example with Enterprise Cloud requirement note
  • Feature comparison: Single consolidated table with 7 key differentiators
  • Essential links: Curated documentation references

The document follows GitHub Docs voice and Astro Starlight best practices, emphasizing conciseness and clarity.

Custom agent used: technical-doc-writer
AI technical documentation writer for GitHub Actions library using Astro Starlight and GitHub Docs voice

Original prompt

Compare "agentic campaigns" to GitHub campaings: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/code-security/securing-your-organization/fixing-security-alerts-at-scale/about-security-campaigns

Custom agent used: technical-doc-writer
AI technical documentation writer for GitHub Actions library using Astro Starlight and GitHub Docs voice


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Compare agentic campaigns with GitHub campaigns docs: compare agentic campaigns to GitHub Security Campaigns Jan 8, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from mnkiefer January 8, 2026 14:52
@mnkiefer
Copy link
Contributor

mnkiefer commented Jan 8, 2026

@copilot: The following will only work for Enterprise customers?
Create GitHub Security Campaign via REST API for categories with 5+ alerts.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jan 8, 2026

@copilot: The following will only work for Enterprise customers?
Create GitHub Security Campaign via REST API for categories with 5+ alerts.

Yes, that's correct. The REST API for creating GitHub Security Campaigns requires GitHub Enterprise Cloud. I've added a note in commit 031ddc4 to clarify this requirement in the integration example section.

Updated terminology to consistently refer to 'GitHub Agentic Campaigns' throughout the document.
@mnkiefer
Copy link
Contributor

mnkiefer commented Jan 8, 2026

@copilot: Make sure the newly created docs and concise and clear, do not repeat or bloat.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jan 8, 2026

@copilot: Make sure the newly created docs and concise and clear, do not repeat or bloat.

Streamlined the documentation in commit 6bb2e8f, reducing from 285 to 65 lines (77% reduction). Removed:

  • Redundant overview and use case sections
  • Three separate feature tables (merged into one)
  • Verbose architecture diagrams
  • Duplicate migration/integration content
  • Excessive links section

All essential information is retained in a clear, concise format.

Clarify the term 'agentic campaigns' by adding 'GitHub' to the description.
@mnkiefer mnkiefer marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 15:37
@mnkiefer mnkiefer merged commit 61cb3f1 into main Jan 8, 2026
1 check passed
@mnkiefer mnkiefer deleted the copilot/compare-agentic-github-campaigns branch January 8, 2026 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants