Campaign Portfolio Report - January 2, 2026

[github-actions[bot]]

Executive Summary

Active Campaigns: 2 (both medium-priority)
Overall Status: Healthy ✅
Risk Level: Low across portfolio
Infrastructure Status: Orchestrators not yet generated

Quick Stats

• Total active campaigns: 2
• High-priority campaigns: 0
• Medium-priority campaigns: 2
• Campaigns at risk: 0
• Combined workflows: 7 unique workflows

---

Campaign Health Dashboard

Campaign 1: Documentation Quality & Maintenance ✅

ID: docs-quality-maintenance-project67
Health Score: 85/100 (Estimated - needs orchestrator for full assessment)
Status: Active, well-configured
Risk Level: Low

Configuration Strength:

• ✅ Comprehensive workflow coverage (6 workflows)
• ✅ Well-defined KPIs with measurable targets
• ✅ Clear governance policies with rate limits
• ✅ Mature project board setup
• ⚠️ Missing generated orchestrator (.campaign.g.md)

Associated Workflows:

• daily-doc-updater - Updates docs based on code changes (daily 6am UTC)
• docs-noob-tester - Beginner perspective testing (daily)
• daily-multi-device-docs-tester - Multi-device testing (daily)
• unbloat-docs - Documentation simplification (daily, on-demand)
• developer-docs-consolidator - Consolidates specs (daily 3:17am UTC)
• technical-doc-writer - Technical documentation creation (on-demand)

Key Performance Indicators:

• Primary: Documentation coverage 85% → 95% (90 days)
• Supporting: Accessibility score 90% → 98% (30 days)
• Supporting: User issues 15 → 5 per month (30 days)

Project Board: Project 67

---

Campaign 2: Go File Size Reduction ✅

ID: go-file-size-reduction-project64
Health Score: 80/100 (Estimated - needs orchestrator for full assessment)
Status: Active, focused scope
Risk Level: Low

Configuration Strength:

• ✅ Clear objective (all files ≤800 LOC)
• ✅ Measurable success criteria
• ✅ Appropriate governance limits
• ✅ Test coverage protection
• ⚠️ Single workflow (lower redundancy)
• ⚠️ Missing generated orchestrator (.campaign.g.md)

Associated Workflows:

• daily-file-diet - Identifies and tracks oversized Go files (daily)

Key Performance Indicators:

• Primary: Files reduced to target size 0% → 100% (90 days)
• Supporting: Test coverage maintained ≥80% (7-day rolling)

Project Board: Project 64

---

Portfolio Analysis

Campaign Distribution

Risk Level Distribution:
├── Low Risk: 2 campaigns (100%)
├── Medium Risk: 0 campaigns
└── High Risk: 0 campaigns

Workflow Coverage:
├── Single workflow: 1 campaign (50%)
└── Multiple workflows: 1 campaign (50%)

Shared Resources & Dependencies

No conflicts detected - The two campaigns operate on distinct domains:

• Campaign 1 focuses on documentation files (docs/, markdown)
• Campaign 2 focuses on Go source code (.go files)

Workflow Overlap: None - each campaign uses dedicated workflows

---

Strategic Findings

✅ Strengths

1. Clear separation of concerns - No resource conflicts between campaigns
2. Conservative risk posture - Both campaigns are low-risk with human review requirements
3. Well-defined objectives - Both campaigns have measurable success criteria
4. Appropriate governance - Rate limits prevent API abuse and reviewer overload

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Missing Campaign Orchestrators (PRIORITY)

Issue: Neither campaign has generated orchestrator files (.campaign.g.md)

Impact:

• Cannot track worker-generated issues via tracker-id
• Cannot aggregate metrics from workflow runs
• Cannot update project boards automatically
• Health scores are estimates only

Recommendation: Generate orchestrators for both campaigns using the campaign generator workflow

Action Required: Run gh aw compile on campaign files to generate .campaign.g.md orchestrators

---

2. Documentation Campaign - Single Point of Failure Risk

Observation: Documentation campaign relies on 6 different workflows

Risk: If multiple workflows fail simultaneously, campaign velocity could drop significantly

Recommendation:

• Monitor workflow health across all 6 workflows
• Implement fallback mechanisms if key workflows fail
• Consider prioritizing the most critical workflows (daily-doc-updater, technical-doc-writer)

---

3. Go File Campaign - Limited Workflow Redundancy

Observation: Go file size campaign has only one workflow

Risk: If daily-file-diet fails, entire campaign stalls

Recommendation:

• Monitor daily-file-diet health closely
• Consider adding a backup workflow for file analysis
• Document manual intervention procedures if workflow fails

---

Cross-Campaign Opportunities

Potential Synergies

1. Documentation of refactoring patterns: Campaign 2's refactoring work could generate documentation for Campaign 1
2. Code quality metrics: Both campaigns benefit from improved code maintainability
3. Shared best practices: File organization principles apply to both code and docs

Future Campaign Ideas

Based on current portfolio patterns:

1. Test Coverage Enhancement Campaign - Complement Campaign 2's refactoring work
2. API Documentation Automation Campaign - Extend Campaign 1's scope
3. Performance Optimization Campaign - Follow similar structure to Campaign 2

---

Recommended Actions

Immediate (Next 24 hours)

1. ✅ Generate campaign orchestrators - Run campaign generator to create .campaign.g.md files
2. ✅ Verify project board access - Ensure GH_AW_PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKEN has correct permissions
3. ✅ Enable orchestrator schedules - Confirm daily runs at 18:00 UTC

Short-term (Next 7 days)

1. 📊 Establish baseline metrics - Once orchestrators are running, capture initial metrics
2. 🔍 Monitor workflow health - Track success rates of all 7 workflows
3. 📋 Review project boards - Ensure issues are being added and tracked correctly

Medium-term (Next 30 days)

1. 📈 Analyze velocity trends - Calculate completion rates and predict campaign timelines
2. 🎯 Adjust priorities - Based on actual progress, re-prioritize campaigns if needed
3. 🔄 Optimize governance - Adjust rate limits based on actual load and reviewer capacity

---

Metrics Collection Status

⚠️ Shared metrics infrastructure not yet available

Expected metrics location: /tmp/gh-aw/repo-memory-default/memory/meta-orchestrators/metrics/

Once the Metrics Collector workflow runs, future campaign manager runs will have access to:

• Workflow success rates
• Safe output volumes
• Engagement metrics
• Historical trends (30-day rolling)

---

Next Campaign Manager Run

Recommended Schedule: Daily at 19:00 UTC (after orchestrators run at 18:00 UTC)

Focus Areas:

1. Verify orchestrators generated successfully
2. Collect first round of metrics from workflow runs
3. Assess project board activity
4. Begin trend analysis with baseline data

---

Notes

• This is the initial campaign manager run
• Health scores are estimates based on configuration analysis only
• Full assessment requires orchestrators to be generated and running
• No historical data available yet for trend analysis
• Repo memory access had permission issues - will retry on next run

---

Report Generated: 2026-01-02 10:00 UTC
Workflow: campaign-manager
Run ID: 20655429864
Meta-Orchestrator: Campaign Manager v1

AI generated by Campaign Manager - Meta-Orchestrator