You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Task Distribution: The majority of copilot tasks fall into three categories:
New Features: 278 tasks (44.1%)
New Features: 96 tasks (15.2%)
Documentation: 91 tasks (14.4%)
Success Patterns: Tasks in the following categories have above-average success rates:
Coding Tasks: 84.2% success rate
Documentation: 80.2% success rate
New Features: 76.0% success rate
Task Complexity: Average complexity varies by task type:
New Features: 4.2 commits, 19.5 files
Bug Fixes: 3.9 commits, 15.9 files
Recommendations
Based on the clustering analysis, here are actionable recommendations:
Optimize for High-Success Task Types: The 'Coding Tasks' category shows the highest success rate (84.2%). Consider:
Analyzing what makes these tasks successful
Applying similar patterns to other task types
Address Underperforming Categories: 'New Features' tasks have a lower success rate (74.1%). Consider:
Reviewing failed PRs in this category for common issues
Improving prompts or providing better context for these tasks
Task Scoping: Tasks requiring 4+ commits tend to be in 'New Features'. Consider:
Breaking down complex tasks into smaller, manageable pieces
Providing more specific guidance for multi-step tasks
Methodology
This analysis uses NLP clustering (K-means with TF-IDF vectorization) to automatically group similar task prompts. The algorithm identified 6 distinct clusters from 630 copilot-created pull requests, analyzing task descriptions, success rates, and code change patterns to provide insights into copilot agent performance.
Data Source: Last 1000 copilot-created PRs in githubnext/gh-aw Analysis Period: Historical PR data through 2026-01-02 Clustering Algorithm: K-means with TF-IDF vectorization (100 features, bigrams) Validation: Silhouette analysis and manual review of cluster coherence
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Daily NLP-based clustering analysis of copilot agent task prompts to identify patterns and optimization opportunities.
Summary
Analysis Date: 2026-01-02
Total Tasks Analyzed: 630
Clusters Identified: 6
Overall Success Rate: 76.0%
Quick Insights
Full Analysis Report
Detailed Cluster Analysis
Cluster 1: New Features
Size: 278 tasks (44.1% of total)
Success Rate: 74.1% (206/278 merged)
Average Metrics:
Top Keywords: add, command, remove, file, firewall
Example PRs: #2405, #2611, #2645
Representative Tasks:
Cluster 2: New Features
Size: 96 tasks (15.2% of total)
Success Rate: 76.0% (73/96 merged)
Average Metrics:
Top Keywords: agentic workflow, agentic, workflow, create, github agentic
Example PRs: #3306, #2183, #2155
Representative Tasks:
Cluster 5: Documentation
Size: 91 tasks (14.4% of total)
Success Rate: 80.2% (73/91 merged)
Average Metrics:
Top Keywords: update, script, command, md, docs
Example PRs: #2120, #2166, #2213
Representative Tasks:
Cluster 3: Bug Fixes
Size: 69 tasks (11.0% of total)
Success Rate: 75.4% (52/69 merged)
Average Metrics:
Top Keywords: original, workflow, issue, original prompt, original issue
Example PRs: #3427, #2914, #3496
Cluster 4: Bug Fixes
Size: 58 tasks (9.2% of total)
Success Rate: 74.1% (43/58 merged)
Average Metrics:
Top Keywords: fix, workflows, agentic workflows, agentic, add
Example PRs: #2789, #2797, #2334
Representative Tasks:
Cluster 6: Coding Tasks
Size: 38 tasks (6.0% of total)
Success Rate: 84.2% (32/38 merged)
Average Metrics:
Top Keywords: coding, coding agent, copilot, copilot coding, agent
Example PRs: #2242, #2423, #2494
Success Rate by Cluster
Key Findings
Task Distribution: The majority of copilot tasks fall into three categories:
Success Patterns: Tasks in the following categories have above-average success rates:
Task Complexity: Average complexity varies by task type:
Recommendations
Based on the clustering analysis, here are actionable recommendations:
Optimize for High-Success Task Types: The 'Coding Tasks' category shows the highest success rate (84.2%). Consider:
Address Underperforming Categories: 'New Features' tasks have a lower success rate (74.1%). Consider:
Task Scoping: Tasks requiring 4+ commits tend to be in 'New Features'. Consider:
Methodology
This analysis uses NLP clustering (K-means with TF-IDF vectorization) to automatically group similar task prompts. The algorithm identified 6 distinct clusters from 630 copilot-created pull requests, analyzing task descriptions, success rates, and code change patterns to provide insights into copilot agent performance.
Data Source: Last 1000 copilot-created PRs in githubnext/gh-aw
Analysis Period: Historical PR data through 2026-01-02
Clustering Algorithm: K-means with TF-IDF vectorization (100 features, bigrams)
Validation: Silhouette analysis and manual review of cluster coherence
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions