🔍 Static Analysis Report - November 18, 2025 #4274
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Static Analysis Report - November 18, 2025
Executive Summary
Today's comprehensive static analysis scan of all 80 agentic workflows shows significant improvement from the previous scan on November 4th. The repository now has only 1 low-severity finding, down from 147 findings two weeks ago - a 99.3% reduction in total issues.
Key Highlights:
Full Analysis Report
Analysis Overview
Findings by Tool
Detailed Findings
Zizmor Security Findings
Finding Details
Issue:
template-injection(Low Severity)Workflow: mcp-inspector
Location:
.github/workflows/mcp-inspector.lock.yml:916:9Description: Code injection via template expansion
Reference: (redacted)#template-injection
Context:
Risk Assessment: Very Low (Likely False Positive)
This warning flags template expressions in the "Setup MCPs" step. However, both expressions use:
secrets.GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN,secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN) - controlled by repository ownersenv.GH_AW_SAFE_OUTPUTS) - set by the workflow itselfNeither of these are untrusted user inputs (e.g., issue titles, PR bodies, comments). Template injection is only a real security concern when
${{ github.event.* }}user-controlled inputs are directly embedded in shell commands.Poutine Supply Chain Findings
No findings. All workflows passed supply chain security checks.
Actionlint Linting Issues
No findings. All workflows passed YAML validation and shell script linting.
Historical Trends
Comparing with the previous scan from November 4, 2025:
Progress by Issue Type
✅ Fully Resolved Issues
SC2086 (actionlint): Double quote variables - 120 occurrences → 0 ✅
SC2012 (actionlint): Use find instead of ls - 10 occurrences → 0 ✅
Expression errors (actionlint): Property not defined - 1 occurrence → 0 ✅
Fix Recommendation
Priority Issue: template-injection in mcp-inspector
Assessment: This is likely a false positive that can be safely ignored or documented.
Reasoning:
secrets.*andenv.*variablesgithub.event.*user inputsRecommended Action: Add a clarifying comment
Alternative: No action needed - this is informational only.
A comprehensive fix template has been saved to
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/fix-templates/zizmor-template-injection.mdwith detailed guidance on:Recommendations
Immediate Actions
✅ No immediate action required - The single remaining finding is low-risk and appears to be a false positive.
Short-term Actions
Long-term Actions
Conclusion
The gh-aw repository demonstrates exemplary security posture with comprehensive static analysis coverage and consistent improvement. The massive reduction in findings (147 → 1) shows strong commitment to code quality and security best practices.
The single remaining finding is a low-severity warning that appears to be a false positive. All high-impact issues from the previous scan have been successfully resolved, including:
Overall Security Grade: A+ 🌟
Scan Details:
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/security-scans/2025-11-18.json/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/fix-templates/Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions