🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 17, 2025 #4175
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This audit report analyzes all agentic workflow runs from the last 24 hours (November 16-17, 2025), covering 57 workflow executions across multiple workflows.
Executive Summary
The audit reveals healthy workflow performance with an 89.5% success rate and no critical infrastructure issues. All required tools and MCP servers are functioning correctly, with no missing tool reports or MCP failures detected.
Key Highlights:
Full Audit Report
📊 Audit Statistics
Overall Performance
Resource Consumption
Error Analysis
📈 Workflow Health Trends
Success/Failure Patterns
The chart shows workflow execution patterns over the past 3 days. The success rate has been consistently high (>85%), with November 16 showing peak activity (30 runs). The few failures are isolated incidents rather than systemic issues.
Token Usage & Costs
Token consumption peaked on November 16 (~9.3M tokens, $6.85), correlating with increased workflow activity. Current spending trends indicate approximately $4.92/day average across the 3-day period, which is within expected operational costs for agentic workflows.
🔝 Top Active Workflows
Analysis: The top 10 workflows show excellent reliability with 100% success rates. The Go Pattern Detector is the most active workflow with 10 executions, all successful.
❌ Failed Workflow Runs
Four workflows failed during the audit period:
Observations:
✅ Missing Tools Analysis
Result: No missing tools reported during the audit period.
All workflows have access to the required tools through the configured MCP servers and built-in tools. This indicates:
🔌 MCP Server Health
Result: No MCP server failures detected.
All MCP servers are functioning correctly:
📊 Tool Usage Statistics
Based on the audit, the most frequently used tools across workflows:
🔍 Error Pattern Analysis
Out of 838 logged errors:
📊 Historical Context
This is the first systematic audit using the new audit agent infrastructure. Future audits will provide:
🎯 Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Priority: Medium)
Investigate Failed Runs
Monitor Token Usage
Long-term Improvements (Priority: Low)
Enhance Error Logging
Workflow Optimization
Monitoring Enhancements
📈 Success Metrics
The following metrics indicate healthy workflow operations:
✅ 89.5% success rate (target: >85%)
✅ Zero missing tools (target: 0)
✅ Zero MCP failures (target: 0)
✅ Average 10.3 turns (target: <15 for efficiency)
✅ $14.76 total cost (within budget)
🔮 Next Steps
📝 Notes
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/2025-11-17.jsonReferences:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions