🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 16, 2025 #4109
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 16, 2025
The automated audit system has completed analysis of agentic workflows over the last 24 hours and historical trends over the past 30 days. This report provides comprehensive insights into system health, performance metrics, and actionable recommendations.
Executive Summary
Last 24 Hours:
30-Day Trends:
📈 Workflow Health Trends
Success/Failure Patterns
The chart above shows workflow success and failure trends over the past 30 days. Key observations:
Token Usage & Costs
Token consumption and cost analysis reveals:
Full Audit Details
Detailed Analysis
Last 24 Hours Breakdown
Workflows Analyzed
The following workflows executed in the last 24 hours:
Note: All completed runs in the last 24 hours were non-agentic workflows (smoke tests, code formatting, and pattern detection). This explains the 0 token usage and $0 cost for this period.
Historical Error Patterns (Last 30 Days)
Based on analysis of cache memory patterns from November 12, 2025:
Error Category Distribution
Total Errors in Last Analysis Period: 1,172
Critical Issue: Token Limit Exceeded
Problem: Recurring token limit exceeded errors (16 occurrences across 3 workflows)
Root Cause: MCP tool responses, especially from
search_pull_requests, exceeding the 25,000 token limitSolution:
perPageparameterhead_limitparameter where availableAffected Workflows: Workflows using GitHub search MCP tools without proper response size management
Missing Tools Analysis
Historical data from cache memory shows:
Note: Python visualization libraries (pandas, matplotlib, seaborn) have been installed and are now available. The gh aw CLI is now available via MCP server.
MCP Server Health
Status: ✅ Excellent
Performance Metrics - 30 Day Summary
Token Usage Statistics
Cost Analysis
Success Rate Evolution
Active Workflows Summary
Based on the status check, the repository has 80 configured agentic workflows:
By Engine:
By Status:
Recommendations
High Priority
None identified in the current audit period.
Medium Priority
1. Address Token Limit Exceeded Errors
Issue: Recurring token limit errors when using GitHub search MCP tools
Action Items:
search_pull_requests,search_issues, andsearch_codeperPageparameter (max 100, recommend 10-30)head_limitparameter in workflows using gh-aw toolsExample Fix:
2. Continue Daily Monitoring
Action: Maintain current audit schedule to track trends and catch issues early
Low Priority
1. Investigate "Other Errors" Category
Issue: 1,094 errors categorized as "Other" require better categorization
Action: Review error logs to create more specific error pattern categories
2. HTTP Proxy & Squid Warnings
Issue: 36 warnings related to Squid proxy configuration
Action: These are non-functional warnings. Consider suppressing or fixing Squid configuration if they clutter logs.
Historical Context
Comparison with Previous Audit (Nov 14, 2025)
* Last 24h included only non-agentic workflows
** Not directly comparable due to workflow type differences
Trend: System shows excellent health with no failures in the recent period. The lower activity is expected due to the mix of workflow types that ran.
Next Steps
✅ Completed Actions:
⏭️ Upcoming Actions:
Appendix: Data Sources
This audit analyzed:
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions