🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 7, 2025 #3398
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 7, 2025
This audit analyzed workflow activity over the last 24 hours, examining 75 workflow runs across multiple agentic workflows. The analysis reveals a significant drop in success rates and identifies key areas for improvement.
📊 Audit Summary
📈 Workflow Health Trends
Success/Failure Patterns
Analysis: The chart shows a concerning drop in workflow success rates on November 6th, falling from 95.83% to 60%. The number of failures spiked to 25 on November 6th, indicating systematic issues affecting multiple workflows. Success rates remained at 60% through November 7th, suggesting ongoing problems that need immediate attention.
Token Usage & Costs
Analysis: Token consumption peaked dramatically on November 6th with 22.19 million tokens consumed at a cost of $14.41, representing an 84% cost increase from the previous day. The spike correlates with the increased failure rate, with approximately $3.63 (25% of daily cost) wasted on failed runs. This suggests inefficient resource utilization when workflows fail after consuming significant tokens.
Full Audit Details
🔴 Critical Issues
1. High Failure Rate - Developer Documentation Consolidator
Impact: 8 failures in 24 hours
Details: This workflow accounts for 32% of all failures and 78% of wasted costs. The high token consumption before failure suggests the workflow is doing substantial work before encountering errors.
Run IDs: Multiple failures detected - view example run §19146064258
2. Multiple Activation Failures - PR Nitpick Reviewer 🔍
Impact: 7 failures in 24 hours
Details: All failures occurred with 0 token usage, indicating failures during activation/setup phase before the agent begins work. This suggests environmental issues, missing dependencies, or permission problems.
Run IDs: Multiple activation failures detected - view example run §19144708898
3. Recurring Failures - Tidy Workflow
Impact: 4 failures in 24 hours
Details: Similar to PR Nitpick Reviewer, all failures with 0 token usage suggest activation/environment issues.
Run IDs: §19144000246, §19147287558
4. Duplicate Code Detector Failures
Impact: 2 failures in 24 hours
5. Other Single-Instance Failures
📊 Performance Metrics Summary
Cost Analysis
Temporal Analysis
November 4, 2025
November 5, 2025
November 6, 2025⚠️
November 7, 2025 (Partial Day)
🔍 Missing Tools & MCP Failures
Status: ✅ No missing tools or MCP server failures detected
During the audit period, no workflows reported:
This indicates the infrastructure and tool ecosystem is stable.
🎯 Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Priority: CRITICAL)
Investigate Developer Documentation Consolidator Failures
Fix Activation Issues
Implement Failure Detection & Alerts
Short-Term Improvements (Priority: HIGH)
Add Retry Logic with Exponential Backoff
Optimize Token Usage Before Failure
Review Workflow Scheduling
Long-Term Enhancements (Priority: MEDIUM)
Implement Health Checks
Create Failure Pattern Database
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/patterns/Cost Optimization Dashboard
📝 Historical Context
Comparing with previous audit (November 6, 2025):
The deterioration in success rates represents a significant regression that requires immediate investigation and remediation.
⏭️ Next Steps
📂 Data Artifacts
Analysis data saved to cache memory:
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/2025-11-07.json/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/index.json🔑 Key Takeaways
🚨 Priority Assessment
SEVERITY: HIGH - Immediate action required to restore success rates to 90%+ baseline. Cost waste of $3.63/day extrapolates to $110/month if not addressed.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions