🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - October 29, 2025 #2711
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 month ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - October 29, 2025
The daily audit of agentic workflows has been completed. This report covers all workflow runs from the last 24 hours in the githubnext/gh-aw repository.
Executive Summary
Over the past 24 hours, 103 agentic workflow runs were executed across 26 different workflows. The system achieved an 80.6% success rate with 83 successful runs, 15 failures, and 2 cancellations. While the success rate is good, there are several areas requiring attention, particularly around error detection patterns and MCP server stability.
Key Highlights:
Full Report Details
Audit Statistics
Run Distribution
Success Metrics
Top Active Workflows
Error Analysis
Critical Findings
While 90 runs (87.4%) reported errors, analysis reveals that many are false positives due to overly aggressive error detection patterns. The detection system is incorrectly flagging:
Top Error Patterns
Genuine Issues Requiring Attention
Permission Issues (40 occurrences): Agents are encountering permission denials when attempting certain operations. This may be related to GitHub token permissions or workflow permissions configuration.
Push to Pull Request Branch Errors (20 occurrences): Workflows are experiencing failures when attempting to push to pull request branches. This could indicate permission issues or branch protection rule conflicts.
MCP Client Fetch Failures (4 occurrences): The gh-aw MCP client is experiencing network fetch failures, potentially indicating connectivity or authentication issues.
Missing Tools
Two workflows reported missing tools, both related to the Daily Firewall Logs Collector and Reporter:
Missing Tool Reports
Affected Runs:
Recommendation: The firewall log analysis workflow needs enhanced permissions to access workflow run artifacts. Consider either:
MCP Server Failures
Two MCP servers are consistently failing in Scout workflows:
Failed MCP Servers
Affected Runs:
Impact: Both Scout workflow runs failed, suggesting these MCP servers are critical dependencies. The failures are 100% consistent across the runs analyzed.
Recommendation:
Failed Workflow Runs
15 workflow runs failed during the audit period:
Notable Patterns:
Firewall Analysis
The firewall monitoring captured 192 network requests over the audit period:
Firewall Summary
Allowed Domains
All network traffic was permitted to the following domains:
api.enterprise.githubcopilot.com:443- GitHub Copilot APIapi.github.com:443- GitHub APIgithub.com:443- GitHub main siteregistry.npmjs.org:443- NPM package registryAssessment: The firewall is functioning correctly. All traffic is to expected and legitimate services. No blocked or suspicious domains were detected.
Performance Metrics
Expected metrics not available:
Recommendation: Investigate why performance metrics are not being captured in run summaries.
Recommendations
High Priority
Fix Error Detection Patterns 🔴
Resolve MCP Server Failures 🔴
Investigate Smoke OpenCode Failures 🔴
Medium Priority
Address Permission Issues 🟡
Enable Firewall Artifact Analysis 🟡
Fix Push to PR Branch Errors 🟡
Low Priority
Fix Custom Agents Loading 🟢
Update Squid Configuration 🟢
Enable Performance Metrics Collection 🟢
Historical Context
This is the first automated audit using the new audit system. Future audits will include:
Next Steps
Methodology
This audit was performed using the gh-aw MCP server to download and analyze logs from all workflow runs in the last 24 hours. Analysis included:
All findings have been stored in the cache memory system (
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/) for future trend analysis and historical comparison.References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions