🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - 2025-10-25 #2387
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 month ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - October 25, 2025
Executive Summary
Comprehensive audit of 107 workflow runs from the last 24 hours reveals a mixed health status with several critical issues requiring immediate attention. While 73% of workflows completed successfully, multiple workflows are experiencing systematic failures.
Key Metrics:
Good News:
Concerns:
Full Audit Report Details
Detailed Analysis
1. Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
1.1 Smoke Copilot - High Failure Rate
1.2 Technical Documentation Writer - Complete Failure
1.3 Smoke GenAIScript - Complete Failure
1.4 Documentation Unbloat - Complete Failure
2. Moderate Issues
2.1 CLI Version Checker - High Failure Rate
2.2 Changeset Generator - Errors Despite Success
push_to_pull_request_brancherrors3. Single-Instance Failures
The following workflows had isolated failures (1 failure each):
Recommendation: Monitor these workflows for recurring failures. Single failures may be transient issues.
4. Healthy Workflows
The following workflows are performing well with 0% failure rate:
5. Missing Tools Analysis
Result: No missing tools detected ✅
Across all 107 workflow runs, zero missing tool requests were logged. This indicates:
6. MCP Server Failures
Result: No MCP server failures detected ✅
All MCP server integrations are functioning correctly with no reported failures.
7. Performance Metrics
Observation: Token usage and cost metrics show zero across all runs
This requires investigation:
Possible Causes:
Recommendation: Investigate token usage tracking mechanism
8. Error and Warning Breakdown
Total Counts
Error Patterns Identified
From Changeset Generator analysis:
Recommendation: Address error handling in:
Priority Recommendations
Immediate Actions (This Week)
Short-Term Actions (Next 2 Weeks)
Ongoing Monitoring
Historical Context
This is an initial audit report. Future audits will compare trends over time to identify:
Next Steps
Audit Methodology: Analyzed 107 workflow runs from logs collected on 2025-10-25. Data includes run status, conclusions, error counts, warning counts, and missing tool reports. Detailed logs stored in
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/2025-10-25.json.Report Generated: 2025-10-25 by Agentic Workflow Audit Agent
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions