Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fil RetroPGF Feedback #43

Open
ccerv1 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Fil RetroPGF Feedback #43

ccerv1 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ccerv1
Copy link

ccerv1 commented May 8, 2024

(tweet)

Just cast my ballot for 47/106 projects participating in Fil RetroPGF!

Some thoughts:

  • Loved seeing the Lotus Dependencies as well as other ecosystem projects building on Filecoin in the round!
  • The voting portal worked well. It was easy to populate my ballot, browse projects, etc. Allocating voting points rather than tokens was nice too.
  • My biggest challenge was reconciling overlapping impact claims: it's hard to attribute the impact of specific PRs or contributions within a repo to separate teams.
  • There's also the challenge of evaluating software contributions alongside other forms of contribution (education, ops, etc), but that's nothing new.
  • Ops were very smooth (IMHO), esp given that this was a new concept for many badgeholders. h/t to @tomhihihihihi and team for all their behind the scenes work.
  • Badgeholder chat was very civil, with good debate and tradeoff discussions. From a governance perspective, this is where much of the value lies.
@ccerv1
Copy link
Author

ccerv1 commented May 8, 2024

@carlbarrdahl would love a feature where I can get click the + button and get a modal that allows me to set my votes (instead of it just being added to the ballot with 0 votes)

image

@carlbarrdahl
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the excellent feedback @ccerv1!

Good suggestion with a popover to enter the amount.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants