-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FloatShield: The next one (R2->R3) #206
Comments
@gergelytakacs @erik1392 Could you please look at the scheme and PCB layout to see if there is any mistake or whether you would like to see something done differently ? Original R1 scheme (for reference): And PCB layout for R3: |
First of all, good job, thank you. I'm reviewing this right now - based on this post and not the files. Schematics:
PCB:
@erik1392 please express your opinion as well. |
Replying to your thread opener:
|
Orientation of mosfet is (from top pin to bottom pin on picture)
Is this symbol better ? I have downloaded and used Helvetica Condensed font on the AutomationShield logo this time, hopefully it is the correct one. I will check everything once more. Please take a look again and tell me if everything is all right, or you would like to see something done differently. |
@gergelytakacs @erik1392 Personally I am very dissatisfied with how the things have ended up on the FloatShield R2. Despite our best efforts, the R2 version, specifically the fan that the board was built to accomodate, is not usable for our purposes. It saddens me that "my" version is not better - not really an proper upgrade, to the R1.
Therefore I propose to make another version (not really sure what to call it, whether R2 - version 2, or R3) that would bring all the compatibility changes the R2 should have brought, without using the new fan - using the original one - either canibalised or bought from store. Alternatively some other fan of this type (two-cable type) could be used, but based on our previous experience, I am not confident in experimenting with unknown fans.
I am well aware that @gergelytakacs is currently preoccupied with more important things than my "hurt ego". Because of this, and possibly to avoid the school bureaucracy, I will order the PCB and required parts by myself.
All I would like to ask for, is your (gently applied) constructive criticism 🙂
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: