Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
120 lines (103 loc) · 7.03 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

120 lines (103 loc) · 7.03 KB
Raw

CRNN_OCR_lite

Disclaimer: This is not a production-ready solution, this repo was created to just show an approach

Idea

Train a light-weight network to solve word-level handwritten text recognition on images.

Training

I decided to use common CRNN model with CTC-loss and a couple augmentations:

The training process consists of the following steps:

  • train model with mjsynth dataset in two steps:
python3 train.py --G 1 --path %PATH_TO_IMAGES% --training_fname annotation_train.txt \
--val_fname annotation_test.txt --save_path %NEW_PATH% --model_name %OUTPUT_MODEL_NAME% --nbepochs 1 \
--norm --mjsynth --opt adam --time_dense_size 128 --lr .0001 --batch_size 64 --early_stopping 5000

python3 train.py --G 1 --path %PATH_TO_IMAGES% --training_fname annotation_train.txt \
--val_fname annotation_test.txt --save_path %NEW_PATH% --model_name %OUTPUT_MODEL_NAME% --nbepochs 1 \
--norm --mjsynth --opt adam --time_dense_size 128 --lr .0001 --batch_size 64 --early_stopping 20 \
%PATH_TO_PRETRAINED_MODEL%/checkpoint_weights.h5
  • prepare IAM dataset:
python3 IAM_preprocessing.py -p %PATH_TO_DATA% -np %PATH_TO_PROCESSED_DATA%
  • initialize new model with weights obtained in the previous step and continue training with IAM dataset:
python3 train.py --G 1 --path %PATH_TO_PROCESSED_DATA% --train_portion 0.9 --save_path %NEW_PATH% \
--model_name %OUTPUT_MODEL_NAME% --nbepochs 200 --norm --opt adam --time_dense_size 128 --lr .0001 \
--batch_size 64 --pretrained_path %PATH_TO_PRETRAINED_MODEL%/final_weights.h5

Results

After full training we've got two models: one for "reading text in the wild" and another for handwritten text transcription (you can find it in /models).
I use the lowest-loss model checkpoint.

I've tested both models with random samples of 8000 images from validation sets:

  • mjsynth-model gives predictions with .71 mean edit distance or .09 if we normilize it by words lengths;
  • IAM-model gives .35 mean edit distance or .08 if we normalize it by words lengths.

Actually, the majority of errors comes from repeated characters in true labels.

Here are transformed images examples with transcription results:

mjsynth IAM

For inference you can use prediction.py or create you own script using functions from utils.py:

  • mjsynth
python3 predict.py --G 0 --model_path %PATH_TO_MODEL% \
--image_path %PATH_TO_IMAGES% \
--val_fname annotation_test.txt --mjsynth \
--validate --num_instances 512 --max_len 23
  • IAM
python3 predict.py --G 0 --model_path %PATH_TO_MODEL% \
--image_path %PATH_TO_IMAGES% \
--validate --num_instances 512 --max_len 21

For example, this script will make prediction on images from %PATH_TO_IMAGES% and save results in %PATH_TO_ANSWER%/*.csv:

python3 predict.py --G 0 --model_path %PATH_TO_MODEL% \
--image_path %PATH_TO_IMAGES% \
--result_path %PATH_TO_ANSWER% \
--max_len %MAX_STRING_LENGTH%

On average, prediction on one text-box image costs us ~100-150 ms regardless of using GPU. And >95% of that time consumes beam-search on LSTM output (even with fairly low beam widths: 3...10) which computes on CPU-side.

Reproducibility

At first, install docker and nvidia-docker.
Pull image from Dockerhub:

docker pull gasparjan/crnn_ocr:latest

or with CPU support only (just change tag):

docker pull gasparjan/crnn_ocr:cpu

Or build it locally:

docker build -t crnn_ocr:latest -f Dockerfile .

Run it via nvidia-docker, mounting volumes:

nvidia-docker run --rm -it -v /home:/data \
                           -p 8004:8000 gasparjan/crnn_ocr:latest

or just docker for CPU-only build:

docker run --rm -it -v /home:/data \
                    -p 8004:8000 gasparjan/crnn_ocr:cpu

...and then run scripts in shell as usual.

The global goal is to make end-to-end pipeline for robust detection and recognition.

  • CRNN trained on mjsynth. Training from scratch;

  • CRNN trained on IAM. Initial weights - from model trained on mjsynth;

  • CRNN trained on hand-written text "from the wild". Initial weights - from model trained on mjsynth & IAM;

    • with the help of recently available azure ocr api (check out azure_ocr.py) I've labeled a small dataset (148 large images) of flipcharts / whiteboards photos with a lot of handwritten text;
    • dataset contains ~12k tokens for training and ~2k for validation. Here is a model;
    • the results are not so convincing: ~1.6 mean edit distance and ~.3 normalized distance. To improve the recognition quality, it makes sense to apply augmentations on images / expand dataset.

  • Text binarizing model (binary segmentation)

  • Word-level text boxes detector

P.S.

The main usecase can be indexing recognized text on images in search: for example you've got bazillion photos of whiteboards / handwritten notes and etc. And you will be really bad at searching particullar photos with needed topic. So if the all photos had some text annotation - the problem disappears.
Why do I think so? Clearly, it's super-hard to get 0% error rate on real-world photos. So if you want to use "hand-made" detection+recognition pipeline to "digitize" text on photos, in the end, you'll most likely need to check and correct all recognized words or add non-recognized ones. This is pretty same expirience to the current "pdf-scanners" (which is painful). And on the other side, if the model can detect and recognize even 20% of words on image, you can still find something using text search.